Image 01

MessianicMusings.com

Not quite Jewish, not quite Christian … totally commited to Torah and Messiah Yeshua.

Archive for July 27th, 2009

A note on growth, again

Monday, July 27th, 2009

I enjoy getting feedback on my Messianic blog. I’ve received some compliments on my comments on church/synagogue growth that were a pleasant surprise. I should clarify, however, I’m not really a decision-maker at the congregation where I currently teach. Really, and I say this only partially in jest, but my opinion on things is about as useful as a motorcycle jack. Well, maybe slightly more useful, but decision-making? That is in the hands of others. I simply help where I’m asked to help.

I did, however, form my views on growth while studying under my Messianic rabbi. The idea or concept of keeping each congregation small enough for one rabbi or pastor to keep track of and know everyone is a concept I drew from him. And I’ve come to internalize it and believe it’s a wise view.

As I’ve said before and elsewhere, the biggest danger facing the Messianic movement today is growth and popularity. The Messianic/Hebrew roots movement is becoming trendy, and fast becoming one of the fastest-growing movements in organized religion.

That means a lot of new opportunities for Messianic ministry will open up, especially as the first generation of Messianic teachers drifts toward retirement. But that’s the danger, because the real challenge now is to ensure that the next wave of Messianic ministers and rabbis are fully trained and discipled, true followers of Rabbi Yeshua and who know thoroughly how to worship the Father in spirit and in truth.

Too often, when this kind of growth and replacement happen simultaneously, folks get rushed into congregational leadership roles without that full training and discipling process taking place. And that can lead to bad theology, inaccurate teaching and an even greater risk of scandals within the movement. It’s a challenge most movements have faced at one time or another.

I’ve always believed that it’s better to take the time to properly train and disciple people than it is to really watch a movement grow as fast as possible. Quality is by far preferable to quantity, in my book. The consequences of ignoring this could easily lead to the watering down of the movement, and I for one have little interest in a “Messianic” church that is indistinguishable from one that is Lutheran, Baptist, Assembly of God or, on the other side of the fence, Orthodox, Conservative, or Reformed.

Plenty of those out there. As a Messianic, let’s be truly Messianic “throughout our generations.”

My D’varim Commentary

Monday, July 27th, 2009

A couple months ago, my wife and I had our insurance come up for renewal. We were already paying a lot, and they wanted to hike the rate quite a bit. So we decided to ask around for an insurance quote or two. It’s a good thing we did; we cut what we would have been paying in half. Yes, really. The L-RD is good! Now here’s my commentary on D’varim. Or listen to it!

Shabbat Shalom.

Our parashah for today is D’varim or “words” and covers Deuteronomy chapter 1 through chapter 3, verse 22. Today’s reading represents the beginning of the home stretch in our yearly Torah cycle. As the book begins, Moses is addressing the people of Israel and retelling them their history since coming out of Egypt.

Much of the book of Deuteronomy is like this, a review of everything that has happened over the forty years Israel has spent in the wilderness, and the first time or two you read it, it can, quite honestly, be a bit off-putting. After all, one might say, didn’t we just read the previous four books of the Torah? Is this review prior to an exam, or do they just think we’re too dense to grasp the previous four books, and so Deuteronomy is offered as a mix between a Reader’s Digest condensed version, and a Cliff Notes on the previous four books.

However, there is more going on here than a simple review; we’re getting details that simply were not given in the earlier books of Torah. The most dramatic example of this, of course, is God’s response to Moses when Israel asks not to hear the voice of the L-RD anymore or they will die. When this is related in Exodus 20:19, no direct response from God is recorded, but He no longer speaks to all of Israel, but only with Moses in the Tent of Meeting. But when the same event is related in an upcoming weekly reading, in Deuteronomy 18:15-22, the L-RD’s response to Moses to this request is recorded in detail. And this is not the only instance of this, so those who would ignore Deuteronomy altogether because, “It’s nothing but review,” are missing out on a lot.

The first question that comes to mind, however, is why God would direct Moses to review all that had happened like this; the answer is obvious if we’ve been paying attention to the last few readings in the book of Numbers. Because of several episodes of sin and rebellion, the L-RD had promised the people of the generation of the exodus that not one of them age 20 or older – except for Caleb and Joshua – would live to see the Promised Land; they would all die in the desert. And the L-RD had made good on this promise.

We just read a couple weeks ago about how a new census was taken, consisting of none of those who were counted by Moses and Aaron at the beginning of the Exodus period, in the beginning of the book of Numbers. And it is this new crowd to which Moses is speaking.

That’s why he’s reviewing so much of what has happened over the past forty years! Most of them don’t remember it themselves! At this point, No one in Israel, except for Moses, Joshua, Caleb and maybe Eleazar are older than sixty years old. Only those between the ages of 41 and 60 were alive when the desert exile began, and anyone 40 and under would have no memories other than life in the desert; they would not remember slavery in Egypt, the crossing of the sea on dry land, the giving of the ten commands at Sinai, or the rebellion of Korach.

You see, the reality of the situation the children of Israel are facing is that they are about to lose their mediator! Moses is soon to be gathered to his people and he is one of the last people alive among them who remembers everything, all that has gone before. He is soon to leave them, and so God charges him with retelling the history of their people, so that it might be remembered in the hearts of every Israelite.

You see, beyond the Moabites, beyond the Amorites, beyond Og, king of Bashan, the greatest risk the children of Israel are facing is a loss of their own sense of identity and history, that certainty of who they are as a people. Keep in mind, this is a people who are many generations removed from any generation that might recall the called-out nature of their people.

They endured generations of slavery in Egypt, living among the Egyptians and their culture, picking up some of it and incorporating it into the way they lived themselves. We see this in the sin of the Golden Calf, which was an impulse to return to that with which they had become familiar in Egypt, a culture of idol worship.

They endured after that an entire generation in the desert, surrounded on all sides by peoples and cultures who did not know the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob in spirit and in truth, and whose practices influenced their own; we see this in the patriarchal system in Israel, the urge to treat women as property rather than people, which God confronted by granting the daughters of Zelophehad property rights. And much of this has happened with Moses, their own chosen mediator between the L-RD and themselves, around! How much Moses must have feared they would drift even further from true worship of the true God without him!

So, as with anyone who is about to leave, Moses begins a long goodbye, a goodbye filled with reminders of who God is, what He as done for them, and who they are as a people. This long goodbye becomes the book we are about to begin studying for the next several weeks.

It is against this backdrop and this understanding that we must begin our study of this week’s Torah portion. One of the overriding themes of this week’s portion is how God is a keeper of His promises; not just in the here and now, but in the generations to come. What does that mean? How can He keep His promises generations after the people He made them to are gone from this life? To get an idea of what I mean, we read this in:

Deuteronomy 2:4-6
Give the people these orders: ‘You are about to pass through the territory of your brothers the descendants of Esau, who live in Seir. They will be afraid of you, but be very careful. Do not provoke them to war, for I will not give you any of their land, not even enough to put your foot on. I have given Esau the hill country of Seir as his own. You are to pay them in silver for the food you eat and the water you drink.’”

Now, think about that for a moment. We first met Esau, the brother of Isaac, early in Genesis. We are hundreds of years removed from the generation of Esau, and yet here is God, directing the descendants of Esau’s brother, Isaac, not to provoke them to war, but to show them kindness, because the L-RD had promised that land to Esau’s descendants, just as He had promised the Promised Land to Isaac’s descendants.

Would Esau know the difference? He’s been dead for hundreds of years! Would the people who live there now, Esau’s descendants, remember the promises made by the L-RD? I would suggest they might not, since there’s no indication they still followed the creator God of Israel. Esau, remember, sold his birthright for a bowl of stew.

But here’s the thing: God would know the difference. He had promised that land to Esau just as he had promised the promised land to the descendants of Abraham, Issac and Jacob. And God holds Himself accountable for the keeping of His own promises far better than any of us do in keeping ours.

So the exodus and the promised land was not some random destination, some kingdom where Moses sensed weakness and a chance for victory. If that was all he was seeking, Moses could have led an attack on any of a number of kingdoms and lands. But this was not the case with the children of Israel; God had a specific land in mind, a land he’d promised originally to Abraham, and there would be no substitutions.

As we read in:

Deuteronomy 2:24-25
“Set out now and cross the Arnon Gorge. See, I have given into your hand Sihon the Amorite, king of Heshbon, and his country. Begin to take possession of it and engage him in battle. This very day I will begin to put the terror and fear of you on all the nations under heaven. They will hear reports of you and will tremble and be in anguish because of you.”

As the narrative continues, we see that the L-RD gives Israel a significant and complete victory over Sihon the Amorite. Their conquering of the land was careful and calculated, not random. And because they obeyed the L-RD, they are given a victory. We see this obedience to the warnings of the L-RD not to attack the lands promised to Esau or Lot in:

Deuteronomy 2:36-37
From Aroer on the rim of the Arnon Gorge, and from the town in the gorge, even as far as Gilead, not one town was too strong for us. The LORD our God gave us all of them. But in accordance with the command of the LORD our God, you did not encroach on any of the land of the Ammonites, neither the land along the course of the Jabbok nor that around the towns in the hills.

We can trace the L-RD’s direction right back to his original promises to Esau and Lot. After a struggle for the blessing of their father Isaac, years later, Esau and Jacob made peace with each other, sacrificed to the L-RD, and Esau was given his own land as an inheritance. We read this in:

Genesis 36:6-9
Esau took his wives and sons and daughters and all the members of his household, as well as his livestock and all his other animals and all the goods he had acquired in Canaan, and moved to a land some distance from his brother Jacob. Their possessions were too great for them to remain together; the land where they were staying could not support them both because of their livestock. So Esau (that is, Edom) settled in the hill country of Seir. This is the account of Esau the father of the Edomites in the hill country of Seir.

In much the same way, Lot was given his choice of land by agreement with Abraham and the L-RD. We read this in:

Genesis 13:7-12
And quarreling arose between Abram’s herdsmen and the herdsmen of Lot. The Canaanites and Perizzites were also living in the land at that time. So Abram said to Lot, “Let’s not have any quarreling between you and me, or between your herdsmen and mine, for we are brothers. Is not the whole land before you? Let’s part company. If you go to the left, I’ll go to the right; if you go to the right, I’ll go to the left.” Lot looked up and saw that the whole plain of the Jordan was well watered, like the garden of the LORD, like the land of Egypt, toward Zoar. (This was before the LORD destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah.) So Lot chose for himself the whole plain of the Jordan and set out toward the east. The two men parted company: Abram lived in the land of Canaan, while Lot lived among the cities of the plain and pitched his tents near Sodom.

When the L-RD destroyed the cities of the plain, most notably Sodom and Gomorrah, for their wickedness, Lot and his family was spared, although his wife perished when she looked back at the destruction. And so the land promised to Lot changes, as we read in:

Genesis 19:30, 36-38
Lot and his two daughters left Zoar and settled in the mountains, for he was afraid to stay in Zoar. He and his two daughters lived in a cave … So both of Lot’s daughters became pregnant by their father. The older daughter had a son, and she named him Moab; he is the father of the Moabites of today. The younger daughter also had a son, and she named him Ben-Ammi; he is the father of the Ammonites of today.

So, this is why the L-RD ordered the Israelites not to go to war with the Edomites, Ammonites, or most of the Moabites, or take their land from them; because God, as a promise-keeper, had promised those lands to the descendants of Esau and Lot, just as he had promised the Promised Land to the descendants of Jacob, also known as Israel. Even though the people the L-RD had made these promises to were gathered to their ancestors for hundreds and hundreds of years, the L-RD Himself kept continued to keep His promises because he is not someone who breaks His promises.

Which leads us to this closing thought. If the L-RD can keep His promises to Esau and Lot hundreds of years after they were gone, how much more is he capable of keeping his promises to us in this life and in the world to come? And if the L-RD calls us to follow Him and be like Him, through the Messiah Yeshua, then shouldn’t we also seek to be keepers of the promises we make, both to the L-RD and each other, by simply letting our yes be yes, and our no be no?

Shabbat Shalom.

My Matot-Masei Commentary

Monday, July 27th, 2009

It’s amazing to believe the children of Israel spent nearly 40 years in the desert following the Exodus and yet their clothes and shoes never wore out. Sure, it’s one of the ways the L-RD took care of His people, to be sure, but they had all ages with them! I don’t know any kid who can keep a good pair of breeches more than a few months… Anyway, here’s my Matot-Masei commentary. Or listen to it!

Shabbat Shalom.

Today we have a double portion, so our parashahs for today are Matot or “tribes,” as well as Masei or “journeys of,” and covers Numbers 30:1 through 36:13, which closes out our time in the book of Numbers. There is a lot going on in these final two portions, so I have a couple asides to cover before we get to our main topic.

First, if this was your first time through the book of Numbers, it’s possible that you may have been surprised a couple weeks ago during our study of Balaam in the portion called Balak. Surprised because if you skim the surface of the text, Balaam seems to come off like an obedient servant of the L-RD, yet we discussed how his heart was becoming hardened and how he may not have been as obedient to the L-RD as he seems on the surface of things.

Well, in this week’s parashah, as Israel is making war on Midian and Moses is receiving a report from his soldiers, any room for doubt about Balaam is taken away when we read:

Numbers 31:14-16
Moses was angry with the officers of the army–the commanders of thousands and commanders of hundreds–who returned from the battle. “Have you allowed all the women to live?” he asked them. “They were the ones who followed Balaam’s advice and were the means of turning the Israelites away from the L-RD in what happened at Peor, so that a plague struck the L-RD’s people.

So we learn here that even though Balaam left Balak when he was unable to curse the people of Israel, it has Balaam who came up with the idea to send the Moabite women into the camp of Israel and tempt their men into sexual and spiritual sin. So indeed, Balaam’s heart was hardened against the people of Israel and, ultimately, their God.

With this understanding of events, it becomes that much easier to see why the L-RD sent an angel to oppose Balaam along his way to see Balak; he was sending Balaam warning after warning that Balaam was not following the L-RD’s true will for him, but was heading down a path to his own destruction. And that destruction is made complete as we learn the final fate of Balaam in:

Numbers 31:6-8
Moses sent them into battle, a thousand from each tribe, along with Phinehas son of Eleazar, the priest, who took with him articles from the sanctuary and the trumpets for signaling. They fought against Midian, as the L-RD commanded Moses, and killed every man. Among their victims were Evi, Rekem, Zur, Hur and Reba–the five kings of Midian. They also killed Balaam son of Beor with the sword.

This instructs us on how unwise it can be to ignore the L-RD and go our own way. The tale of Balaam should remain a cautionary story, giving reason for each of us to pause as we seek the L-RD to ensure that – whatever we are doing in our lives – we are doing it truly seeking out His will and direction, rather than our own. The L-RD will allow us ultimately the freedom to do anything; yet only he knows which paths lead to destruction and we ignore His prompting at our own peril.

The next aside I’d like to travel down briefly concerns the daughters of Zelophehad, who we studied last week. The God of Israel granting women property rights was an important message by the L-RD that women are not property, even when surrounded by other cultures that treat them as such. So many people love to use the excuse, “Well, so-and-so was a product of their time,” as though right and wrong changes depending on time and culture. This is not so with the L-RD.

And yet, due to the patriarchal system in Israel, the ruling of the L-RD does raise other questions about the future of Zelophehad’s inheritance . We read about this in:

Numbers 36:2-4
They said, “When the L-RD commanded my lord to give the land as an inheritance to the Israelites by lot, he ordered you to give the inheritance of our brother Zelophehad to his daughters. Now suppose they marry men from other Israelite tribes; then their inheritance will be taken from our ancestral inheritance and added to that of the tribe they marry into. And so part of the inheritance allotted to us will be taken away. When the Year of Jubilee for the Israelites comes, their inheritance will be added to that of the tribe into which they marry, and their property will be taken from the tribal inheritance of our forefathers.”

One can see how this would certainly be a concern for the Israelites. God’s ruling, while just, needed further explanation to avoid the inheritance of land becoming a confusing mess in future generations as land passed from wife to husband to daughter and back again. Here is how the L-RD settled it:

Numbers 36:5-10
Then at the L-RD’s command Moses gave this order to the Israelites: “What the tribe of the descendants of Joseph is saying is right. This is what the L-RD commands for Zelophehad’s daughters: They may marry anyone they please as long as they marry within the tribal clan of their father. No inheritance in Israel is to pass from tribe to tribe, for every Israelite shall keep the tribal land inherited from his forefathers. Every daughter who inherits land in any Israelite tribe must marry someone in her father’s tribal clan, so that every Israelite will possess the inheritance of his fathers. No inheritance may pass from tribe to tribe, for each Israelite tribe is to keep the land it inherits.” So Zelophehad’s daughters did as the L-RD commanded Moses.

What does this tell us? Perhaps this: that God is a God of order and He desires to prevent sin, not permit it. Had this ruling not have been made, then as the portion points out, Zelophehad’s name would have been but a faint memory long ago. Had He not made this ruling, it’s a very real possibility that some among Israel would have sought out Zelophehad’s daughters simply to add to their own inheritance and take some of what had been given to another tribe for their own. By inviting the L-RD into our lives and decision-making, we are often protected from consequences we do not see and cannot foresee. What better reason could one come up with to allow God to take control?

Finally, the main teaching I’d like to explore today is the establishment of sanctuary cities in the promised land. These cities were to be among the cities of the Levites, with a total of six sanctuary cities in all, three on one side of the Jordan and three on the other side of the Jordan.

What are sanctuary cities? They are places where someone who has caused a death unintentionally and without malice may flee to escape the vengeance of a grieving relative who wants to take their life for the life that was taken by them.

You see, in the time of Moses, if someone became a murderer by intentionally killing someone, there had not always been a system of court trials, appeals and endless delays before justice was delivered. Instead, if a person’s guilt in a murder could be established by two or more witnesses, then a relative of the deceased could take on the role of a “blood avenger” and could take the life of that murderer at any time. We read this in:

Numbers 35:20-21
If anyone with malice aforethought shoves another or throws something at him intentionally so that he dies or if in hostility he hits him with his fist so that he dies, that person shall be put to death; he is a murderer. The avenger of blood shall put the murderer to death when he meets him.

Prior to the establishment of sanctuary cities, there was nowhere for a person involved in the death of another to flee in order to escape these blood avengers. As a result, many who otherwise had not slain another person out of malice, but were simply involved in the accidental taking of lives, were themselves being unjustly put to death.

So sanctuary cities are established under the control of the priesthood, and in these cities blood avengers are not allowed to take revenge. Now, does this mean things are paradise on earth for the person who has caused an accidental death? Hardly. We read this in:

Numbers 35:22-28
“‘But if without hostility someone suddenly shoves another or throws something at him unintentionally or, without seeing him, drops a stone on him that could kill him, and he dies, then since he was not his enemy and he did not intend to harm him, the assembly must judge between him and the avenger of blood according to these regulations. The assembly must protect the one accused of murder from the avenger of blood and send him back to the city of refuge to which he fled. He must stay there until the death of the high priest, who was anointed with the holy oil. But if the accused ever goes outside the limits of the city of refuge to which he has fled and the avenger of blood finds him outside the city, the avenger of blood may kill the accused without being guilty of murder. The accused must stay in his city of refuge until the death of the high priest; only after the death of the high priest may he return to his own property.

So, imagine that. Even if you are judged innocent of murder – that you had caused a death unintentionally – the grieving relative, the avenger of blood, can still take your life if you wander out of the sanctuary city and he finds you, all without ever being considered guilty of murder himself. In fact, the only way one who has caused such a death can actually leave a sanctuary city and return to his home is if the high priest who was in that position at the time of the accidental death dies himself. Considering that a high priest could live decades beyond a particular event like that, this is no small matter. An older offender who causes an accidental death near the beginning of the tenure of a younger high priest might never outlive that high priest, and therefore must remain in that sanctuary city for the rest of their lives.

So where is the mercy in this regulation on sanctuary cities? The mercy is in the alternative; if you intentionally cause the death of another person and were found to be guilty of murder, you could be put to death yourself. Spending a lifetime in a sanctuary city may not seem merciful, but compared to a death penalty, it is.

What can we draw from this? Well, as we saw in Genesis in how the L-RD dealt with Kayin, the first murderer, marking him as someone not to be murdered himself, to how he suggests here the Israelites are to deal with those who cause a death unintentionally, the L-RD is not lacking in compassion even for those guilty of the heaviest of sins. While He remains a holy God who cannot allow sin to enter into His presence, he does offer everyone any possible chance for genuine repentance, for them to turn away from their sin and live a life devoted to the L-RD and obeying his teachings.

While many who cling to replacement theology claim that the Torah is nothing but judgment and paints a picture of a God lacking in mercy, the establishment of these sanctuary cities in Israel paints a contrary portrait of the L-RD. As we are advised by Peter in this passage from:

II Peter 3:9
The L-RD is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. He is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance.

May this teaching on sanctuary cities remind us of the patience of the L-RD, and to pray for those who have strayed from obedience to Him, desiring to see them turn away from sin and experience His forgiveness, just as we have enjoyed the protection of our spiritual sanctuary city, the Messiah Yeshua.

Shabbat Shalom.