Image 01

MessianicMusings.com

Not quite Jewish, not quite Christian … totally commited to Torah and Messiah Yeshua.

Archive for the ‘ministry’ Category

A note on growth, again

Monday, July 27th, 2009

I enjoy getting feedback on my Messianic blog. I’ve received some compliments on my comments on church/synagogue growth that were a pleasant surprise. I should clarify, however, I’m not really a decision-maker at the congregation where I currently teach. Really, and I say this only partially in jest, but my opinion on things is about as useful as a motorcycle jack. Well, maybe slightly more useful, but decision-making? That is in the hands of others. I simply help where I’m asked to help.

I did, however, form my views on growth while studying under my Messianic rabbi. The idea or concept of keeping each congregation small enough for one rabbi or pastor to keep track of and know everyone is a concept I drew from him. And I’ve come to internalize it and believe it’s a wise view.

As I’ve said before and elsewhere, the biggest danger facing the Messianic movement today is growth and popularity. The Messianic/Hebrew roots movement is becoming trendy, and fast becoming one of the fastest-growing movements in organized religion.

That means a lot of new opportunities for Messianic ministry will open up, especially as the first generation of Messianic teachers drifts toward retirement. But that’s the danger, because the real challenge now is to ensure that the next wave of Messianic ministers and rabbis are fully trained and discipled, true followers of Rabbi Yeshua and who know thoroughly how to worship the Father in spirit and in truth.

Too often, when this kind of growth and replacement happen simultaneously, folks get rushed into congregational leadership roles without that full training and discipling process taking place. And that can lead to bad theology, inaccurate teaching and an even greater risk of scandals within the movement. It’s a challenge most movements have faced at one time or another.

I’ve always believed that it’s better to take the time to properly train and disciple people than it is to really watch a movement grow as fast as possible. Quality is by far preferable to quantity, in my book. The consequences of ignoring this could easily lead to the watering down of the movement, and I for one have little interest in a “Messianic” church that is indistinguishable from one that is Lutheran, Baptist, Assembly of God or, on the other side of the fence, Orthodox, Conservative, or Reformed.

Plenty of those out there. As a Messianic, let’s be truly Messianic “throughout our generations.”

My B’midbar Commentary

Sunday, May 31st, 2009

While many good sites concentrate on health issues like appetite suppressant, here at MessianicMusings, we concentrate on searching the L-RD’s word for truth. Here’s my commentary on B’midbar. Or listen to it!

Shabbat Shalom.

Our parashah for today is B’midbar or “In the wilderness” and covers Numbers chapter 1 through verse 20 of chapter 4. This week’s reading largely concerns the taking of a census of the children of Israel. We read about this in:

Numbers 1:1-3
The L-RD spoke to Moses in the Tent of Meeting in the Desert of Sinai on the first day of the second month of the second year after the Israelites came out of Egypt. He said: “Take a census of the whole Israelite community by their clans and families, listing every man by name, one by one. You and Aaron are to number by their divisions all the men in Israel twenty years old or more who are able to serve in the army.

At its most basic level, this census seems to be a military census, since the count only includes men of military age. The results show that at this time, Israel consists of over 600,000 men of military age … 603,550, to be exact, according to verse 46. Now, one might wonder about the significance of a book that concerns the counting of the people in various ways. Why is it important?

Well, for one thing, although the numbers seem in most places to be rounded up to the nearest fifty, they generally are not the nice, round numbers that one might expect if critics of the Bible were correct and the story of the Exodus were a parable and everything in it was symbolic. Instead, the numbers found here are irregular and seem to be random, as one might expect if a large number of people were actually counted. So the very existence of this book and the record of those counted testify to the historical nature of the book. It is a book that confounds skeptics.

But certainly confounding skeptics was not foremost in the mind of the L-RD when he inspired Moses to write the book of Numbers. There must be a deeper meaning, a purpose beyond a mere historical record. And we get a hint of what that is from this tradition from the sage:

Rashi
Because God felt a deep love for Israel, He constantly counted them. When they left Egypt He counted them (Exodus 12:37); after many were punished because of the sin of the Golden Calf He counted them once again (Exodus 33:11ff); and now that He had caused His presence to dwell among them, He counted them once more.

This is an idea I can relate to. You see, when I was young, I became an enthusiastic collector of comic books. Whether it was Spider-Man, Batman, Fantastic Four, Teen Titans or the X Men, I simply enjoyed the exciting mixture of dynamic visual art and compelling storytelling. And since I was not a person who cast aside any type of book or reading material, I soon needed storage boxes and, ultimately, an inventory system.

I can still remember buying packs of hundreds of index cards, rolling them one at a time into my Smith-Corona electric typewriter, and spending hours typing out an index card for each comic I bought, being careful to note not only the series and issue number, but the story title, writer, artists, cover price and so on. I spent almost as much time inventorying and counting my collection of comic books as I did actually reading it. I continued my collection through most of my teenage years before finally selling it around the time I entered college, making just enough in the sale to help pay for a Commodore-64 computer I needed to help me write papers at college.

What explains such behavior? Well, as with any collector, whether it is stamps, rare coins, model vehicles, or, as in my case, comic books … this is an example of what one does when they develop an affection for a treasured possession. I would count and sort and preserve and store so that I could easily find and re-read any issue I wanted to find, at any time; the system helped me also make sure I hadn’t lost anything, as well as track what I had and what I needed.

The key, there, is the concept of a treasured possession. That is a phrase that pops up between the L-RD and his chosen people, as we remember from:

Exodus 19:5-6a
Now if you obey me fully and keep my covenant, then out of all nations you will be my treasured possession. Although the whole earth is mine, you will be for me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.

It is easy to overlook that simple turn of phrase, “treasured possession,” and take it for granted, but it has a significant meaning. The word used here is actually:

Strong’s H5459 ceg-ul-lah
* AV – peculiar treasure 3, special 1, jewel 1
* 1a) valued property, peculiar treasure

So we can see this is a word that implies a very special relationship between the L-RD and his chosen people. They are not just a common possession – as He says, the whole earth belongs to Him – but because of his relationship to the people of Israel because of his covenant with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, when they hear His voice and obey his instructions, they are a people he values above all else in creation.

Is this value God places here based purely on heritage and birth? It would appear not, because this declaration is made in connection to what? To hearing the voice of the L-RD and obeying all that He commands. As Rabbi Stan has pointed out in his recent sermons, the phrase “a kingdom of priests and a holy nation” does not reappear in the Bible until I Peter, when it resurfaces in light of the followers of Yeshua receiving the Holy Spirit and once again being able to hear the voice of the L-RD. If you can’t hear His voice, you can’t be a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.

Yet even though the Hebrew people passed up the opportunity to hear God’s voice, to speak to Him directly, they remained His treasured possession. Can we who are not by heritage Jewish share in this status? We read this in:

I Peter 2:9-10
But you are a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people belonging to God, that you may declare the praises of him who called you out of darkness into his wonderful light. Once you were not a people, but now you are the people of God; once you had not received mercy, but now you have received mercy.

Other translations render verse nine as “a peculiar people,” while the NIV renders it as “a people belonging to God.” The Greek word used there comes to us from the Strong’s entry:

G4047 peripoiesis
* AV – purchased possession, obtaining, saving, peculiar
* 2) possession, one’s own property

This is nearly the same meaning, the same expression, as the Hebrew word cegulah. Although not identical, it expresses a very similar sentiment, that of a possession, even a special possession. Peter’s statement is directed to believers in Messiah Yeshua, so as long as we listen to His voice and obey all of His commands, I think it’s reasonable to draw the conclusion that we are grafted in to that statement of being a treasured possession of the L-RD, on the same basis … meaning, so long as we hear His voice and obey all that He commands.

So what kinds of love are expressed by the L-RD when He counts those He loves and who love Him? We get this clue from a tradition recorded in:

The Weekly Midrash, page 690
When they left Egypt He counted them and said Israel is my first-born son, for he loved them with the love that a father bears a son. The second form of love was that of a person to his righteous friend. Israel repented after they were punished because of the sin of the Golden Calf. Moshe and the tribe of Levi killed those who had worshipped it, and although the people numbered 600,000, no one had raised a hand against them. It is therefore obvious that they had repented. For this reason, God loved them and counted them. The third kind of love was expressed when He wished to rest His presence among them, and take Israel as His people, and so He counted them.

The counting also gives us a ballpark figure of how many the children of Israel numbered at this time. If there were 603,550 males of military age, as a starting point, you can at least double that number to account for the number of women of the same age, bringing the total to over 1.2 million at least. Then, if you add in at least another twenty-five percent for those who were younger than that – from newborns through teenagers – a reasonable estimate of the group gathered there at Sinai is about 1.5 million; it would be hard to imagine, under even the worst circumstances, that the group was less than one million, just based on the number of men age 20 and up. And that’s not even including the Levites, who were not counted since they are dedicated to God and not required to serve in the military.

Now, the Bible at times takes a dim view of census-taking. For example, in the book of II Samuel, David repents for taking a census of the people against the will of the L-RD and the judgment against him was so harsh it led to the deaths of 70,000 Israelites by plague.

In the gospel of Luke, a census of the people by a Roman governor, Caesar Augustus, is linked to the birth of Yeshua, but the census is cast in a negative light. Even Exodus contains instructions on how to avoid suffering a plague as a result of census-taking.

Yet there are differences. David’s census was inspired because, in his old age, he began trusting in his military might, rather than in the L-RD. The Roman census was linked to taxation, which included hefty taxes even on the poor.

That’s not the kind of census the L-RD is engaging in here; He is asking for a count of his people because He loves them and they are a treasured possession. Just as a collector of stamps, coins, sports cards or comic books will periodically devote time simply to sort through and count their collection, so too does the L-RD here desire to sort through and count those hearts who are devoted to Him by hearing and by obedience.

As we journey through this book of Numbers, let us keep in mind that every time the L-RD is counting His people, be it men of military age, or the number of first-borns, or whatever … it is, at its most basic, a way in which the L-RD is expressing His love for those who love, listen to, and obey Him.

Shabbat Shalom.

Coming soon … audio blogging!

Thursday, April 30th, 2009

Good news for those of you bored with just reading my commentaries and not being able to hear them: audio blogging (or podcasting, if you will) is coming soon to MessianicMusings.com! That’s right, I’ve overcome the technical barriers, found a great FTP program that uploads smoothly and quickly, and very soon I will be posting MP3 audio versions of my commentaries along with the text version.

As I roll this feature out, I’ll go back and offer up audio versions of all my old commentaries as well. While it’s not as exciting an announcement as it would be if I were to announce wholesale discounts on steel buildings, well… let’s just settle for an improvement to what this site is good at, shall we? Audio blogging is coming to MessianicMusings.com!

The difference between commentaries and sermons

Thursday, March 5th, 2009

I think I’m finally grasping the difference between sermons and commentaries. It’s been a fine line for me and one I haven’t always seen clearly as I continue my Messianic training. It’s a quandary even the best diet pills can’t help me with.

So, here’s my understanding as of now: in a Torah commentary, the purpose is to teach, not to exhort. In a sermon, exhortation is just fine. Check.

Now here’s my newest insight: in a Torah commentary, you are to stick closely to the content of the parashah, not use it as a launching point for tangentially-related topics. Check.

OK, so, a good commentary on Tetsaveh, for example, would talk about the priestly garments described in the instructions of the L-RD to Moses. A less-focused commentary that strays into sermonizing would be one that picks up on the presence of a hint of Messiah in the instructions for the Tent of Meeting, and then launching into the theme of obedience to God.

Guess which way my upcoming Tetsaveh commentary went? Not the better of the two ways, I’m afraid, but in the process I did learn a lot more about how to distinguish a commentary from a sermon; so it was a great growing experience! Mazel tov!

Growth

Sunday, March 1st, 2009

Only being four months into our stay at our current facility, Beth Yeshua is already bursting at the seams. The building we’re renting space from holds perhaps 80 people comfortably and would max out at about 100, which would require opening up the balcony.

It’s a small facility that fortunately is new enough not to need dehumidifiers, but ideal for a church just getting off the ground. But in the last few weeks, we’ve been hitting attendance in the 70s and we’re still growing steadily. We’re ready for a new facility.

This is a great blessing from the L-RD, but one that ought not be taken for granted as an automatic sign of the L-RD’s approval. After all, there are mega-churches that serve congregations that can fill 20,000-seat basketball stadiums, but mere popular attendance is no sure sign of teaching the L-RD’s truth and having those efforts blessed.

In fact, the most popular of pastors and rabbis often have to abandon the core principals of faith simply to gain such wide acclaim. Some folks dream of the day when the Messianic movement will be widespread enough to play host to the first Messianic mega-churches.

Not me. The burden of leadership over a congregation should never grow beyond the ability of a head rabbi to oversee it all. Of the best Messianic churches in the US, few are more than perhaps 250 people in size. And that’s plenty, because beyond that a congregation grows a bit larger than one head rabbi can handle alone. The best results for keeping theology and instruction consistent come when one rabbi and one board of elders pursue one consistent vision.

Megachurches with staff rosters bigger than most Messianic congregations simply can’t do that. They grow beyond themselves. So while it’s exciting to see Beth Yeshua growing to the point where it can seek a facility that might seat up to 250, I’m not sure I’d want to see it grow beyond that.

Some people just don’t want to listen

Monday, February 9th, 2009

I’ve come to the conclusion that some people just don’t want to listen. I’d be better off trying to sell them promotional products than trying to reason with them from Scripture.

Of course, this is not the case in most places, except on message boards. I frequent a couple and although everyone claims to be there to “learn different perspectives,” all they really spend time doing is picking apart everything that is written, and then questioning your salvation.

That’s to say nothing of the name-calling and other obnoxious behavior I’ve observed. I’m getting to the point, definitely, where I see no point in continuing to engage in reasoning with unreasonable folks, especially on a faceless chat board.

Folks tend to relate a bit more civilly when face-to-face, even during disagreements.

So what is replacement theology?

Sunday, August 10th, 2008

So, you may ask, what is replacement theology, anyway?

It’s the kind of question that’s important to ask because it’s not as easy to recognize as the difference between a Sleep Number bed and a TV lift cabinet. It’s more subtle than that.

At its core, replacement theology is the notion much of Christianity is afflicted with that says, “God rejected the Jews. All their promises transfer to us now, but the curses are theirs alone. We (usually “we” is considered to be either the Christian church or, in the USA, this nation) are the “new Jerusalem” and “the shining city on a hill” spoken of in Scripture.”

It’s a mindset that says the “law” (e.g., Torah) is done away with and now we only have grace, only have forgiveness, and since we’re forgiven, anything goes, really… since it’s all a matter of repenting and claiming the forgiveness found in Jesus.

And it’s also the mindset that assumes the rules are different for “Christian” believers than it was for Jews who followed Adonai and His Torah. In doing this, the replacement theology mindset robs the Jewish people of all that Adonai promised them, and transfers it to Christianity. The danger in this, seldom recognized by those who hold such beliefs, is that makes Adonai a promise-breaker, not a promise-keeper. It makes haShem someone who changes, rather than someone who is the same yesterday, today and tomorrow. It ultimately robs haShem of his character, so in essence, replacement theology constitutes lashan hurrah against the L-RD Himself, and if that isn’t blasphemy of the Holy Spirit, it’s getting pretty darn close at least.

Not everyone who holds a replacement theology mindset, however, realizes they hold it, or that it’s wrong. It’s simply a false teaching that’s been around since the time of Constantine, and arguably before him since he merely codified it into “the Church.” And since it’s been passed down from generation to generation for nearly 1900 years or thereabouts, it’s the only thing many in Christianity know as a way to think about these things.

How do you recognize it? It can be as simple as recognizing what the implications are when someone utters a few off-the-cuff words like, “That’s an Old Testament thing.”

Wrong, wrong, wrong, my friend. The things done in the flesh still matter. Believing otherwise cheapens grace and diminishes the work of Yeshua at Calvary.

First visit since the diagnosis

Monday, July 7th, 2008

This past weekend, my wife and I had our first visit with mom since she was diagnosed with cancer. Here’s what we know: it’s stage four cancer of the pancreas, as well as some spots of lung cancer from her smoking habit. Today (Monday) she was meeting with another doctor who would be describing the course of treatment, care options and the like that he would be recommending for her case.

It’s a tough, grim diagnosis and a topic that makes something as common and pedestrian as door hardware seem like a preferrable topic of conversation. But as we visited, I was struck by our ability to make the time together enjoyable and fun, rather than morose and full of tears.

I suspect we were all trying to create some good memories to fall back on, once this progresses a bit more. That’s what I think. And I think it’s needed.

Mom tires too easily to go out for lunch anymore, so we brought a homemade meal to her. My wife, who is a wonderful cook, fixed up some homemade spaghetti sauce and brought it down with noodles and cheesy garlic bread. On the trip down, we stopped by a grocery store and picked up six different kinds of brownies: peanut butter, cherry frosted, mint chip, German chocolate, caramel and regular fudge. We all had a taste of each of the ones we liked.

We left the leftovers with Mom and Dad to make sure they had something nice to heat up for the next few meals. We took pictures and played cards and handheld games together at the table, talked some serious stuff but didn’t allow our time together to become dominated by the cloud of doom trying so hard to hover over us and spoil our time.

The end comes of each of us, eventually, until Yeshua’s return; with Mom, we have a warning that it’s coming soon, so I’d rather spend that time letting her know what she means to both my wife and me, creating as many good memories as we can in the time that’s left, than sitting around weeping about what we cannot change.

There will be time enough for tears in private… before she passes, and after.

It’s a mystery

Tuesday, June 10th, 2008

As I said in my first up-front talk on Friday, one of the things that is a mystery to me is why so few people want to take part in children’s ministry, and why it’s so hard to find teachers when we have so many parents.

Sure, kids can be a bit intimidating as a group the first time you stand in front of them as their teacher, and they’ll never stop testing limits with you, but they’re pre-teens, for heaven’s sake. They tend to listen if they can tell you mean business.

While my wife and I don’t have kids of our own yet, because we’ve decided to wait a bit longer, we both care about bringing the kids in our kehilat up in the ways of the L-RD. That’s why I teach bar/bat mitzvah class and why she does praise and worship for the younger kids.

If we’re not parents and we see the need and fill it, how could a person who is a parent not want to be a part of their kids’ Shabbat School experience? Maybe they need a good liver cleanse?

If for no other reason, they should at least want to know what their kids are learning and make sure it’s consistent with the beliefs of their kehilat. Yet, as the old saying goes, what seems simple, isn’t.

The sound of my voice

Tuesday, June 10th, 2008

One of the scary things about delivering a mini-sermon, as I did for the first time last Friday, is that afterward you can get a recording of yourself and, for the first time, have to hear what you sounded like to others. That, for me, was scarier than taking a diet pill without reading the label first.

My first impression of my own speaking voice is not great; I sound high-pitched and a bit nasal. That’s not as I’d prefer it, obviously. I’d like more of the bass in my voice to come across, and have a richer, fuller-sounding voice that sounds stronger.

But, my voice is my voice and I’m not sure there’s a whole lot to be done about it. I mean, much as hearing it is a bit annoying, I’m sure my reaction is one more of shock than of anything. When I was younger, back in high school, I sang with the baritones and basses, depending on the song. Now my voice sounds more like a high tenor.

Scary. But in terms of ministry relevance, probably a lot of fuss over nothing essential.

My first time “up in front”

Tuesday, June 10th, 2008

It came with little warning, little preparation time, and a whole lot sooner than I’d planned; but last Friday, I finally had a chance to go up in front of the congregation and give a short talk. I wouldn’t quite call it a full-blown sermon; I was given 5-10 minutes and ending up running over 13 minutes, but I did reference over half a dozen Torah and Brit haDasha sources, so it felt a bit like a sermon. Or at least close enough for horse shoes and hand grenades. Take a listen and decide for yourself.

Anyway, the initiation was thrilling and fortunately everone was very supportive and offering positive feedback. I have a lot of seeking God left to do, but at least now I have some confidence about my ability to produce and deliver something approaching a sermon.

Sure, it’s not the kind of achievement that merits renting Vegas hotels for a getaway after, but it is a big milestone nevertheless.

Churches get the oddest calls

Wednesday, May 7th, 2008

Here’s me pulling back the curtains of a ministry a bit again, but in the months I’ve been working at my messianic shul, one of the things that struck me is how churches get the strangest calls, sometimes.

I mean, yes, most of our calls are of the rather normal and mundane variety, but as a house of worship, we attract our share of … colorful callers. I’ve fielded phone calls from self-proclaimed prophets who didn’t even have the courtesy to say “Hi” before going into their rant, as well as some rather interesting and unique requests from complete strangers.

Now, a lot of these callers are well-meaning folks and when we get calls from people like that, oddity doesn’t really matter. However, I have had a couple calls from folks who seem to think that we’re more of a public library than a house of worship.

It’s not a big deal and often, even the odd calls add some fun and variety to my day. And it certainly helps expose me to a wide variety of expectations people bring to the table when they interact with a house of worship. Good training ground for me, as I forge ahead in my advanced studies. I learn from fielding these calls, more than I would have expected to.