Image 01

MessianicMusings.com

Not quite Jewish, not quite Christian … totally commited to Torah and Messiah Yeshua.

More B’ha’alotcha impressions

May 28th, 2010 by Craig Hansen

When the Gentiles stir up the Israelites with grumbling about the food provided by the L-RD, provoking them to the point that they were all using selective memories of their lives as slaves to consider themselves better off than when they were in Egypt, because at least they had a variety of food to eat there, the L-RD responds to their longing for meat in a massive way.

Moses complains to the L-RD about the burdens of being responsible for so many people, and the L-RD delivers a somewhat terse response. “They want meat? Fine! They’ll have it not just for a day or two, but for a whole month, until it’s coming out their nose and they grow sick of it.”

Not exactly a happy chef, our L-RD, eh? So when Moses asks where it’s all going to come from, He sends a flood of quail into the camp for the people to harvest… and while the food was still in their mouths, a plague struck that ended the lives of many.

A message about being content with whatever the L-RD has given us could be no clearer. Am I right?

B’ha’alotcha impressions

May 28th, 2010 by Craig Hansen

At the men’s Torah study Rob and I head up each Thursday night, we were amazed at the richness of this week’s parashah. B’ha’alotcha covers Numbers chapters 8-12, and it’s just full of riches.

One of the items that stood out is the dispute between God and Moses’ siblings. Both Aaron and Miriam complain against Moses and suggest that God has spoken to them also.

While this is true, what was the reason for their grumbling? That Moses had a Gentile bride. That was the cause of their jealousy! Yet what a suggestive picture this is of the Messiah. He, too, has taken a Gentile bride as the “grafted in” portion of the commonwealth of Israel that is called his people. What an amazing picture!

Yet, lest Gentile believers get too proud of themselves, one should note that in this parashah, it is the grumbling of the Gentile “mixed multitude” hanging out with the children of Israel that begin the grumbling against the L-RD’s manna-only diet.

And this is just scratching the surface of this rich, rich portion.

The gift of a break…

May 24th, 2010 by Craig Hansen

One thing I am trying to prepare myself mentally to embrace is my upcoming family vacation. My wife, my dad and I are all headed on a week-long fishing getaway in northern Minnesota, and it’s long overdue. Andie and I have never even enjoyed a honeymoon, let alone a vacation; our only getaways in our first three and a half-plus years of marriage have all been crisis-related. So the chance to get away will be long overdue and most welcome.

However, I’ve lately realized just how hard I’ve been pushing myself when my wife and I came to loggerheads over when to leave and when to return. Andie, understandably, wants to make the most of our time away and leave as early as possible, and come back only when we have to.

I, however, am so used to sacrificing for others that I insisted we not leave until after the Sabbath and I also campaigned to come back in time for the next Sabbath, cutting our getaway one overnight’s stay short.

My wife was generous, willing to meet me halfway when it came to leaving after the Shabbat is over; but she insisted I meet her halfway, too, and not come back until we’ve enjoyed our full time away.

Initially, I got too big for my breeches and resisted. But I’m slowly, slowly, slowly starting to learn to listen to my wife.

“Other than responding to family crises,” she reasoned, “we have served and served and served. You make sacrifices all the time for others. We can miss one Shabbat to enjoy some time away.”

And, of course, she’s right. When one is in the mindset of serving God, it gets hard to realize that a job is a job, and sometimes you need a “Shabbat of rest” even when that means missing a Shabbat with your congregation. I’ve now come to believe God is trying to teach me something important about His Shabbat through this, so, hard as it may be for me, I’m going to honor my wife’s request, meet her halfway, and miss a Sabbath of serving, in order to really experience rest.

Even God rested as our example; it’s time for me to follow His lead.

Wait seems to be the hardest word…

May 16th, 2010 by Craig Hansen

The old song tells us that “sorry” seems to be the hardest word; I’m not so sure. In our culture, I think it’s “wait.”

These days, if people want to update their house, they don’t spend years saving aside; they seek to borrow money they don’t have.

It’s the same in ministry, I think. People want answers, but they want them now, not next week or next year. People are fine waiting on God’s timing, only so long as God’s timing fits their own schedule. One of the biggest problems 21st-century believers in the US have is understanding the concept of waiting on God.

I have actually heard people express the sentiment that they’d rather hear God give them a “no” now than wait a few years to hear a “yes.” Is that Biblical? Is that our model for waiting on the L-RD?

Not exactly. When Moses was around 40, he had become aware of his Jewish heritage even though he’d been raised in Pharaoh’s household, and he knew there was a call of God on his life.

Then, Moses got impatient and instead of waiting on God, he took matters into his own hands, slaying an Egyptian guard who was mistreating a Hebrew slave. Was that following God’s plan or waiting on Him?

No. Moses’ actions there were ultimately selfish, taking matters into his own hands by stopping one isolated instance of injustice; had he waited for God’s timing, Moses might have been able to bring all the injustices of the Egyptians against the Israelites to an end much sooner.

Did God still want to use Moses to end those injustices? Sure. But how long did Moses have to wait on God after that act of impatience and murder? Forty years! Most of us don’t even want to wait through a 40-minute sermon to hear from God. What do we know, really, about waiting on Him?

Here’s lesson one, though: you’ll like the results a lot better when you DO wait on him.

Recognizing a call

May 16th, 2010 by Craig Hansen

For quite a while now, many people around me – including some not inclined to unearned praise – have been telling me they sense God has a calling on my life, and that my hope to one day become an effective teacher and community leader in a Messianic congregation may be fulfilled. That’s certainly been my hope, ever since I began pursuing the advanced study class in ministry Rabbi Stan first offered over three years ago.

I’ve been through a lot since then; I’ve lost my mom to cancer and my wife and I have taken my dad, who is in the early- to mid-stages of Alzheimer’s/dementia now lives with us. I’ve spent over eighteen months teaching bar-bat mitzvah-age kids and then over a year acting as cantor, Torah commentator and occasional fill-in for Rabbi Stan at Beth Yeshua, before that congregation was merged back into Sar Shalom.

These days, I’m responsible for helping Stan bring his teaching into the video age, fill in on commentaries as needed, and generally helping out wherever I can as my time and talents allow (and sometimes beyond). I’m still even helping co-lead a men’s Torah study that stick to actually studying the Torah itself, rather than getting off-track into side-issues.

As time has gone on, more and more people have become certain there’s a ministry call on my life. And I agree with them; with every step I’ve taken so far, I’ve recognized that God was calling me to it, beginning with signing up for the advanced study in the first place.

At each step along the way, I’ve been careful to follow what God has called me to and tried hard to stick to doing only that and no more. I try to emulate the example of the Israelites in the desert; moving only when God moves and resting only when God rests.

Hopefully, I do this successfully more often than not. But as for moving out into starting my own congregation? So far, I haven’t heard God clearly signal me that it’s time to do that, just yet. And since He’s made His will clear to me each step long the way so far, why would he suddenly become mysterious.

I know it’s sometimes a challenge to recognize a call; I know I have a general call on my life, but at the moment I think it’s only to continue doing what I’m already doing.

I do hope and await a call on my life from God for something bigger, for the call that lets me know that my time supporting the ministries of others has concluded and that my own ministry has begun. But I’m going to wait on God to call, lead the way and make it clear to me.

I know that in some ways, I’m not eager for this season to end; I have learned so much from Stan and believe I have much to learn even now. I don’t think that season’s over yet. I genuinely enjoy the roles I’ve filled over the past three-plus years.

But I do think that one day, God will tell me I’m ready and my own ministry has begun. I’m not in any rush; God’s timing is perfect. Yet when that time comes, I have to be ready to hear it and respond in faith.

It’s a delicate tight-rope to walk, recognizing God’s call and making sure it is genuine, separate and distinct from our own wants and desires and ambitions. One cannot be too eager and leap ahead of God’s call, trusting that however long you are called to study and serve, He is preparing you for the work He has in mind for you.

But I also know one can get too comfortable in serving others who have their own call, and get tempted to run from your own. The trick is to immerse yourself in prayer, learn to recognize God’s voice, and then let His voice be the one that guides you. The trick is to make sure you neither leap ahead or drag behind; that you simply move when God says move, and stay when God says stay.

No more, no less. Forget where and when and how. It’s the example of all men of faith in God; for it is written of Noah, of Abraham, of Isaac, of Jacob, of Moses and so on and so on… “and then he did everything the L-RD commanded of him.”

That’s the model to follow.

My 2010 B’har-B’chukotai Commentary

May 12th, 2010 by Craig Hansen

This opportunity to do a Torah commentary came up suddenly. Right through mid-week before the Shabbat, another fine Messianic Rabbi In Training (MRIT) was scheduled to do this one; he even had it written. But then he fell under the weather and needed a quick replacement. The rabbi called me Thursday night, during my men’s Torah study, to ask if I could fill in and assure me I could just use last years’ if I needed to. I told him I could probably do better than that.

I got the call around 8:30 PM Thuesday night. I didn’t get home and settled in front of my keyboard until two hours later. By 1 AM, I was done. Good thing we stayed on-topic in our Torah study; the portion was fresh in my mind and all I really needed to do was transfer some of what we had discussed into commentary form. It may not be exciting, but this is what I came up with. Or listen to it!

Shabbat Shalom.

This week, we have a double portion for our weekly reading. It includes B’har, a Hebrew word that means, “On the mount,” as well as the portion known as “B’chukotai,” a Hebrew word that means, “In my statutes.” This double portion covers Leviticus chapter 25 through Leviticus chapter 27, and brings to an end our time in Leviticus for this Torah year.

This week’s reading covers the concept of giving even the land the people of Israel will enter, the land God has promised to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, a Sabbath rest.

LEVITICUS 25:2B-5
‘When you enter the land I am going to give you, the land itself must observe a Sabbath to the L-RD. For six years sow your fields, and for six years prune your vineyards and gather their crops. But in the seventh year the land is to have a Sabbath of rest, a Sabbath to the L-RD. Do not sow your fields or prune your vineyards. Do not reap what grows of itself or harvest the grapes of your untended vines. The land is to have a year of rest.

Now, when many people look at this passage, they comment on how marvelous it is, how it shows God’s wisdom that modern agricultural science bears out the idea of giving the land a rest from producing crops is such a good idea; they cite the science of crop stress, soil enrichments and all these wonderful facts about farming that confirm that God knew what he was talking about in this passage.

Well, I’m not here to talk to you about how wonderful it is that God knew all this. Of course He knew it! He’s God! I’m here today to mention how sad it is that it took us well over 3,000 years of the science of man, from the time of the Exodus to figure out that God was right all along!

Of course, I think it’s also important to dig deeper than that. You see, God’s not just some cosmic farmer handing down crop management tips from his heavenly Monsanto office. God is going well beyond general truths here; he’s laying down some very special promises to the people of Israel, and they are conditional promises, based on the obedience or disobedience the people of Israel display in response to the L-RD’s commands.

You see, this is not merely about agriculture here. This is actually a teaching the L-RD is giving about how completely He wants us to observe His Sabbaths. You see, it’s not just enough for us to observe it as believers. He wants His Sabbaths to be observed by all of creation, a point he makes clear here by pointing out that even the Promised Land itself should rest; not only on the seventh day of the week, when we are to do no regular work, but in the seventh year, when we are to rest the land for an entire year.

Now, some people might read this and say, OK, we get the point. Observing the Sabbath is a good idea. Got it. But do we really have to observe a year of not working the land once every seventh year? I mean, c’mon, that would ruin the economy, people would starve.

No, they wouldn’t. God’s promises for both the seventh year Sabbath for the land, as well as the fiftieth-year Jubilee, show two important things: first, God will provide; and second, these really are special promises for His people as they enter the Promised Land, and not just good general agricultural principals that would work anywhere in the world. We read one of these promises in:

LEVITICUS 25:20-22
You may ask, “What will we eat in the seventh year if we do not plant or harvest our crops?” I will send you such a blessing in the sixth year that the land will yield enough for three years. While you plant during the eighth year, you will eat from the old crop and will continue to eat from it until the harvest of the ninth year comes in.

Now that’s a promise that definitely will not work just anywhere! I mean, go ahead and try it if you want to; find some secular farmers who don’t observe the L-RD’s commands and have them work the land six out of every seventh year, being sure not to work the land at all in the seventh year, but in no other way honoring God or observing His commands. I can almost guarantee you that their sixth-year crop will NOT be a triple harvest.

Remember, God’s promising to offer His people this triple harvest in the sixth year, before they actually observe the seventh-year agricultural Sabbath. The promise and provision will be obvious, giving His people confidence to indeed follow through with their obedience. The point is, these are special promises by the L-RD to His people, not just some guidebook to farming in Israel.

Yet there will still be doubters, people who say, “C’mon, I mean, we’re talking about dirt here. We’re supposed to let dirt rest? God can’t be serious, can He?”

Well, let’s take a look at just how serious God is about this command. We find this in:

LEVITICUS 26:33-35
I will scatter you among the nations and will draw out my sword and pursue you. Your land will be laid waste, and your cities will lie in ruins. Then the land will enjoy its Sabbath years all the time that it lies desolate and you are in the country of your enemies; then the land will rest and enjoy its Sabbaths. All the time that it lies desolate, the land will have the rest it did not have during the Sabbaths you lived in it.

So, what God is saying here is that while His people are certainly free to either obey His command for the agricultural Sabbath, or to disobey, there will be a penalty if they ignore this command: God will scatter his people among the surrounding nations, lay waste to all that was built there, and the land will lay desolate until all of the agricultural Sabbath years and Jubilee years they failed to observe have been fulfilled. I’d say this passage at least suggests that the L-RD takes this command many people read past quite seriously.

The parashah goes on from here to establish rules for observing the fiftieth-year Jubilee, in which those who sold property are allowed to return to it, those who are in bondage are allowed to go free, and those who are in debt are forgiven their financial burdens.

Once we enter chapter 26, however, the theme changes to the topic of obedience versus disobedience, and here is where we delve into the part of this week’s teaching that focuses on the life application aspect of these commands. Why is that important?

Well, how many here are farmers? Not many? OK, how many of you raising your hands are actually farmers in the land of Israel. Boom. Nobody left. Right?

You see, while agricultural commands are the topic, what applies to us all is our willingness to either agree with God, that His rules and instructions are right and just, and follow through with that by obeying Him – or to disagree with Him and walk in rebellion and disobedience.

We have that choice, all of us. We are free to do either and God will not step in and prevent it. However, there is a cost to disobedience, even for believers. Not just for the Jewish believers who looked forward to the promised Messiah, but for all of us looking back on the fulfillment of that Messianic promise in Messiah Yeshua.

Leviticus 26 makes it very clear where God stands. First, Hhe promises to reward the children of Israel richly if they obey Him. But then, He also outlines the penalties that will befall them, the correction they will suffer if they disobey. We read this in:

LEVITICUS 26:14-16A
“‘But if you will not listen to me and carry out all these commands, and if you reject my decrees and abhor my laws and fail to carry out all my commands and so violate my covenant, then I will do this to you:

The passage then continues on to outline all the levels of punishment that the L-RD will dole out to Israel if they continue to walk in disobedience. As Rob observed in our men’s group Torah study this week, there’s an interesting parallel between these punishments, and the plagues the L-RD sent upon Egypt when Pharoah refused to fear and obey God in allowing Moses and the Israelites to leave for three days to worship God in the desert, and bury Joseph’s bones outside of the land of Egypt as he had requested.

The similarity is that God doesn’t correct or rebuke or punish all at once; it comes in waves, and between each wave, God offers a chance for repentance and a return to obedience. As each opportunity for repentance passes, the next wave of punishment gets a little more severe. Each time, this comes not because God loves dishing out punishment to His people, but as an attempt to wake them up to their rebellion and offer them a chance to return to the path of obedience.

We read this in:

LEVITICUS 26:27-28
“‘If in spite of this you still do not listen to me but continue to be hostile toward me, then in my anger I will be hostile toward you, and I myself will punish you for your sins seven times over.

So you see, between each wave of punishment, God inserts and if-then statement. If you continue to disobey, here’s the next thing I’m going to have to do, and it’s harsher and more severe than the last.

What’s the solution? We read this in:

LEVITICUS 26:40-45
“‘But if they will confess their sins and the sins of their fathers—their treachery against me and their hostility toward me, which made me hostile toward them so that I sent them into the land of their enemies—then when their uncircumcised hearts are humbled and they pay for their sin, I will remember my covenant with Jacob and my covenant with Isaac and my covenant with Abraham, and I will remember the land. For the land will be deserted by them and will enjoy its Sabbaths while it lies desolate without them. They will pay for their sins because they rejected my laws and abhorred my decrees. Yet in spite of this, when they are in the land of their enemies, I will not reject them or abhor them so as to destroy them completely, breaking my covenant with them. I am the L-RD their God. But for their sake I will remember the covenant with their ancestors whom I brought out of Egypt in the sight of the nations to be their God. I am the L-RD.’”

If we confess, if we repent, if our uncircumcised hearts are humbled, if we pay for our sins, then the L-RD will remember his covenant with us and return us to right standing before Him. Now, some people believe this is all done away with; that repentance comes one time when we surrender our lives to Yeshua, and then is completely unnecessary because we’re forgiven. But that’s not so.

For as long as there is an ability to rebel against God, for as long as we are able to choose disobedience over obedience, there is a need for repentance, humbling, and payment for sins. It is important to remember that simply saying, “I’m sorry,” isn’t true repentance. It involves turning away from the disobedience. It involves making restitution to those we’ve wronged. Those are all things we are capable of, but in our rebellion, sometimes refuse to do.

Fortunately, the one thing we can’t do on our own – to pay our owner for his loss as a result of our rebellion – and our owner is the L-RD – is a price that has already been paid for us, by the Messiah Yeshua.

May we never treat the price He paid in our place, for our disobedience, as though it came from a dollar store.

Shabbat Shalom.

Response to criticism of “Christian” writers

May 12th, 2010 by Craig Hansen

Let me set the scene here for you, because while this is not a sermon or a commentary, you may need a little context to understand this post.

Although I am Messianic, I have many friends who are mainstream Christians. I know some of them on chat boards, others I’ve known a long time and still know, in person. I was on a chat board recently when one posting member there vented his spleen on the topic, “Are Christian writers selling God’s Word?”

His post was almost unrelated to the topic, but when I asked for clarification, his basic response was along the lines that Christian writers ought not sell books for money or be paid for their work, but should give it away and “trust God” for their provision.

Sounds convenient and super-spiritual. It also echos something an in-person friend recently said to me about Christian and Messianic music artists… that they should “go play wherever they feel called without charging for it, and trust God for their provision.”

In combination, these comments annoyed me because I know that neither of these people perform their jobs for free. So I wrote a rather long-winded (what’s new, right) response on the chat board and thought I’d share it here for the benefit of my blog audience. I’ll take out the name of the person I’m responding to, to protect his privacy.

Also, keep in mind that for recording artists, the financial aspects are even more dismal. Think about that the next time you bypass iTunes’ $0.99 fee for most songs via illegal downloads, people!

Dear ________,

What’s clear to me from your response is, nothing’s clear. I don’t intend cruelty when I say this, but you really seem to be speaking from a position of being ill-informed on a number of issues.

Writers write for a living, just as those who assemble cars work in car plants for a living, or U.S. Senators tax and spend for a living, or insurance agents sell insurance for a living.

I don’t know what you do for a living, but let’s assume for a moment you… I don’t know… do tax accounting for a living.

How would you feel if someone (like your boss) said you you, “I’m glad you feel called by God to help people with their taxes. Trust God for how to pay your rent, your health care, your utility bills and such, because clearly you’re a man of faith and God will provide. However, don’t ask us for a salary or benefits… God is your provider, not us.”

Ridiculous, right?

Just as ridiculous as saying that writers ought never make a living from writing.

Also, truly uninformed about how most writers… especially writers in the area of faith… build their careers. Almost all writers become writers by jumping at any and every opportunity they can find to write.

Early on, and usually throughout their careers, this means writing things with little or no form of payment in exchange, or writing for pay, but usually not writing something they WANT to write, but instead writing something that someone IS willing to pay them for.

Eventually, very fortunate writers will sometimes get the opportunity to both write WHAT they want to write about AND get paid for it. This usually comes after years, if not decades, of paying dues by writing a lot of stuff for free, or writing a lot of stuff they weren’t interested in, just to get experience.

So once a writer actually gets, say, a book deal, with either a Christian or secular publisher, anything they get paid is, in my book, the equivalent of a lifetime achievement award.

It should also be noted that even the topic-title here is misleading… Christian writers don’t write the Bible… and that’s the only God’s word I know about. Inspirational books, devotionals, biographies, books on prophecy and other biblical themes may be inspired by the Bible, but they are NOT God’s word. Their works are not the equivalent of the Bible in any way, shape or form and any writer who claims so isn’t being forthright or honest with themselves.

Authors of Christian or other faith-based fiction are even less of a fit for this charge; they are crafting made-up stories, and while their fiction may be inspired by the Bible, or the themes may be a reflection of Biblical principals, novels are NOT God’s word in any way, shape or form. And I know of NO writers in the fiction category who claim that!

Next point: authors don’t decide when or where their books are offered for sale. It just don’t happen that way. That is up to the publisher, book distribution channels, book retailers and, in some churches, the church’s resource center.

FICTIONAL ILLUSTRATION: Let’s say Frank Peretti writes a new book. We’ll call it THE DARKNESS RETURNS. Tyndale offers him an advance of $25,000 against royalties for it, let’s say. The royalty rate is set as 10 percent of the cover price. And the book retails for $24.99, let’s say, hardcover.

That means that until THE DARKNESS RETURNS sells 10,000 copies, Frank’s not going to see even one more penny.

Let’s say THE DARKNESS RETURNS flops… It sells about 15,000 copies, but against an initial print run of 50,000 copies, because it’s a sequel to his best-selling pair of books ever and the publisher over-estimated the public’s appetite for a new DARKNESS book 20 years after the last one was published.

So the remaining 35,000 copies get marked down to $9.99 and then $5.00, but only 5,000 more copies sell and the rest get remaindered/recycled.

So that means this, in terms of what Peretti gets paid:

Of the 15,000 copies that sold at full price, Peretti would be due $37,350… but wait… He was already paid a $25,000 advance, so it’s only an additional $12,350 that he gets from that.

Of the extra 5,000 copies, let’s say 3,000 sold at $9.99 and 2,000 at $5.00. Peretti gets 10 percent on those prices, adding another $3,970 to the pot

So, in all, Peretti would receive $25,000 up front, and an additional $16,320 over the shelf-life of the hardcover. That’s $41,320 in total compensation for THE DARKNESS RETURNS.

Because the book tanked, the trade paper rights only add another $10,000, no one picks up the movie or eBook rights and the trade paper never sells well enough to reimburse him beyond the initial $10,000 advance.

So that’s $51,320 total. Sounds like good money, right?

Hold on, though: Peretti takes an average of three years to write a new novel. Sometimes more, but we’ll go with three years for this illustration.

Plus, it’s an average wait-time of 18 months from acceptance of a manuscript to the book hitting store shelves.

The shelf-life of a hardcover is approximately a year, and many publishers delay payment for accounting purposes… sometimes up to a year after the actual sales are made.

So we’re talking about six and a half years from the start of writing a book to the end of its revenue-generating life, in this case.

Now, divide that $51,320 by six-and-a-half years and you get an annual average salary of $7,695. Plus, realize that he’s working for free the first three years while he’s writing it, and only gets about half of his eventual total compensation up-front.

He’ll use that $25,000 to live on while he’s taking another three years to write his next book that hopefully does better, and in the meantime, the other part of his compensation comes in smaller amounts over time… much of it not until 2.5 years later, except maybe the trade paper sum, which might come a year after publication.

To add insult to injury, the poor sales of THE DARKNESS RETURNS probably means his publisher won’t be willing to pay him $25,000 on his next book. (The average book advance in the US is $5,000… there are very few Stephen Kings and Tom Clancys earning seven-figure advances, and virtually none in the Christian market.)

Can you live on an average of $7,695/year? Not many people can, these days. That’s poverty-level.

Now, granted, if you have a successful book, the money can get a whole lot better… but few books sell really well. Most are, at best “mid-list” books that sell 10,000 copies or less.

So to suggest that Christian writers are rolling in money, sullying the Temple of the L-RD by selling God’s word, is just CLEARLY off the mark in just about every way possible.

Most writers, even successful ones, need day-jobs. Some are pastors; some are teachers or college faculty. Or whatever else they can make a living at. Very rare is the full-time writer. And most writers, even successful ones, donate a lot of free writing to various friends, causes, etc.

So the whole thrust of your post just demonstrates a lack of understanding of the reality of a writer’s life.

If you have an issue with books being sold in your church’s resource center, that’s an issue to take to your church; but it’s hardly the writer’s fault. Instead of telling the writer he should work for free, perhaps talk to your church about purchasing these books as resources and giving them away for free; then see how long it takes before your church becomes financially insolvent.

Also, it should be noted that in my illustration above, at least Peretti didn’t have to share in Tyndale’s loss; they overprinted THE DARKNESS RETURNS by 30,000 copies… far more than the 20,000 they sold. For them, even publishing THE DARKNESS RETURNS was probably a net loss… Paper and ink and binding and shipping and marketing all have costs associated with them, remember… They’re even worse off than the writer, and you would pooh-pooh them for selling copies to anyone who orders them, even churches?

As near as I can discern from your post, your real issue is with churches that have a resource center… that’s a church issue, not a writer or even a publisher issue.

Walking in repentance

April 28th, 2010 by Craig Hansen

Too often, believers today take grace cheaply, using it as an excuse to act just as they did before they knew the yeshua of our God. They’ll attempt to disqualify the reliability of the Bible, the reliability of translations, the accuracy of interpretation or simply ignoring the passages that convict them of their sin – and therefore, their need for Yeshua – simply so they can keep doing what they’ve been doing without ever repenting.

Whether it’s former Christian recording artist Jennifer Knapp trying to call herself a legitimate believer and a lesbian at the same time, or bloggers who talk about God forgiving their sins whether they’ve repented of them or not, a lot of folks apparently believe that the judgments of God don’t apply to them.

It’s time for believers to abandon the self-deception, put on their big-boy and big-girl boots, and realize that the same Yeshua who said, “I tell you the truth, today you shall be with me in Paradise,” also said, “Go and sin no more.” And far more than even that.

My 2010 Tazriah-Metsorah Commentary

April 26th, 2010 by Craig Hansen

This Tazriah-Metzorah commentary is the first one I’ve delivered since Beth Yeshua closed, so enjoy! Or listen to it!

Shabbat Shalom.

This week, we have a double portion for our parashah. It includes Tazriah, a Hebrew word that means, “She bears seed” or “She conceives,” as well as the portion known as “Metsora,” a Hebrew word that means, “Infected one,” or “diseased one.” This double portion covers Leviticus chapter 12 through Leviticus chapter 15. Now, this week’s reading covers such topics as pregnancy and childbirth, skin diseases, bodily discharges and the laws surrounding purification from all of these afflictions. But before we delve into that, I want to share a word of encouragement from this week’s portion for a select portion of this congregation – and you’ll know who you are in just a moment.

Now, some of you might remember the 1980s. One of the big trends back then was custom T-shirt shops. You could walk in, select the size and color of T-shirt you liked best, and then select just about any kind of saying or cartoon that you wanted and it would be added to the shirt while you waited.

I’ll always remember one we got my father. It’s not a Biblical saying, but it might sound like it. The t-shirt read, “God made only a few perfect heads. All the rest, he covered with hair.”

I thought it was pretty funny back then, too. Of course, those of you who’ve known me for a few years now will testify that, as the years go on, my head’s getting a little closer to perfect all the time.

Yet the word of encouragement for those of us who are a bit closer to perfect atop our heads comes to us from:

LEVITICUS 13:40-41
If a man’s hair has fallen from his scalp, he is bald; but he is clean. If a man’s hair has fallen off the front part of his scalp, he is forehead-bald; but he is clean.

So, that’s good news, right? Some of us may be balding, men, but at least we’re clean! Now, joking aside, the passage does go on to say that if baldness is accompanied by sores of various kinds, it can indeed indicate ritual uncleanness. Of course, so can a whole lot of other things. And what we see in this week’s double-portion is that there is so much ritual uncleanness in the world, it’s almost impossible to avoid!

Yet it’s important to note that ritual uncleanness is not always the same as sinfulness – though, at times, it can be. For example, that which is unclean can often be remedied in this week’s parashah by simply bathing and separating oneself from the community until evening. Can water grant remission of sins? No, the Torah is clear that blood must be shed for sins to be pardoned. So if some types of uncleanness can be remedied by washing with water, they must not be sources of sin, but a simple lack of purity.

Yet even this insight misses something more important. What both of these portions talk about is what? Ceremonial uncleanness, right? As we read, for example, in:

LEVITICUS 12:1-4
The L-RD said to Moses, “Say to the Israelites: ‘A woman who becomes pregnant and gives birth to a son will be ceremonially unclean for seven days, just as she is unclean during her monthly period. On the eighth day the boy is to be circumcised. Then the woman must wait thirty-three days to be purified from her bleeding. She must not touch anything sacred or go to the sanctuary until the days of her purification are over.

So you see, many of these purity laws have to do with one’s fitness to enter the Temple … the Tent of Meeting … and since that Temple no longer stands, it would seem many of these laws are of limited relevance and use to us today. Right?

Not so fast. Because while the laws of ritual purity were specific to Jewish people living in the Land, and relevant to entering the Temple or the Tent of Meeting, they also have a more symbolic, spiritual aspect to them.

Let’s start by looking at the word for impurity or infection. The Hebrew word for our second portion is metsorah. It is derived from two root words. The first, motzi, means “source or well-spring.” The second, ra, means “evil.” So the word metsorah, in addition to meaning “infected one” or “diseased one,” could also be said to mean “well-spring or source of evil.”

When one thinks about this, it begins to make sense. After all, on a spiritual level, what causes infection or disease in our spirit? Evil, right? Specifically, exposure to evil or a source of evil. And often, simple exposure is enough.

We see the truth in this in the story of the fall of man. What happens when Adam and Chavah are exposed to the lies of the serpent? They become infected, diseased with doubt. Doubt about what? Whether to trust in the words of the L-RD, or the words of the serpent. Exposure alone to that doubt is enough to produce what comes next: rebellion against God’s only command at that time, as they eat of the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil.

In the same way, we can see how simple exposure to impurity can infect us in our daily walk, in our witness, in how we view, understand and even explain our faith in the L-RD to others.

For example, what does the Tenakh teach us about where to invest our faith and trust? We read this in:

PROVERBS 3:5-6
Trust in the L-RD with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding; in all your ways acknowledge him, and he will make your paths straight.

This is what the L-RD asks of us, right? To simply put our trust in Him, rather than our own understanding of things. We can all agree on that, right?

Yet we live in a world that is full of people who don’t do that; who put their trust in their own understanding, rather than in the L-RD. Still with me? Good.

One of the most prevalent theories out there in the world today, in the understanding of men, is the theory of evolution. Like atmospheric yeast, it’s out there in the world, like it or not. And this idea that man was not created but evolved from lower life-forms, and all the ideas that spring forth from that core theory, such as that the earth is, as scientist Carl Sagan always said, “billions and billions of years old,” rather than nearing the end of the six thousand years of human history spoken of in the Bible, has been entrenched in public education and the public mind so firmly for so long, that the fact is that today, many believers would prefer to cast aside the first few chapters of Genesis in an attempt to lure those who view the world through evolutionary, so-called scientific eyes, than to even attempt to believe what God has revealed about the nature of His creation.

The rationalization many use is that they “don’t want a few chapters in one book of the Bible” to be a barrier to someone entering the kingdom of heaven. “It’s not important enough,” they’ll claim.

Yet, is that what we’re called to do? Are we to stake claim only in the words of the Torah that make sense to the unbelieving? Or are we to simply trust in the L-RD with all of our hearts and lean not on our own understanding?

And that’s what simple exposure can do! Simply by being in the same atmosphere as this well-spring of evil, we become infected, diseased in our own thinking. We start to change what we believe to make it easier for the unbelieving to accept, rather than simply standing firm in our trust in the L-RD… which is what the L-RD has called us to do!

This is just an example. There are many. Perhaps the well-spring of evil in your home is broadcast television, which contains so many shows that are rooted in evil and untruths that can infect you, make you impure in your simple, commanded trust in God. Perhaps for your children, it’s videogames that is the source of infection. It could be an unhealthy amount of time spent on the Internet, rather than in the Word of the L-RD.

It could even be something as simple as evil speech – known as lashon horah in Hebrew – the practice of speaking of people in a way meant to diminish them in the eyes of others, even if what you’re saying is true. If the intention is to diminish rather than to build up, it’s lashon horah and it can destroy a sense of safety and trust in a community.

Now, perhaps, we begin to see the pieces come together from what seems on the surface like a rather dry and boring pair of Torah portions. For you see, for all these detailed instructions on how to rid oneself of impurity, there is one remedy that is never recommended. Whether an impurity is a result of sin, or a simpler impurity that isn’t necessarily sin but does make you ceremonially impure – in other words, unfit to come before the L-RD – one solution that the Torah NEVER endorses is to do nothing about it!

That’s amazing to think about, isn’t it? I mean, you read about how touching a mildewed cloth makes you impure, but the solution is to wash and wait until evening, the start of a new day, and one is tempted to think: well, then that’s not sin! Why is the Torah being so nitpicky? If it’s not sin, why all the fuss over simple impurity.

Well, it’s because while God does desire for us to come to Him through Messiah Yeshua and experience His yeshua – His salvation – he isn’t done with us once the sin is dealt with. God wants us to live a life far above that minimum standard required to attain eternal residence in His kingdom! He wants us to, as he repeats throughout the Torah, including just before this week’s parashah in:

LEVITICUS 11:45
I am the L-RD who brought you up out of Egypt to be your God. Therefore, be holy, because I am holy.

Holiness – not just freedom from sin but freedom from all impurity – is the nature of God. To experience intimacy with God, we must strive to be like him. Not just forgiven of our sins, but pursuing holiness, which is the lack of all metsorahs – the lack of any sources or well-springs of evil in our lives.

Let us, therefore, pursue lives that are holy – free of all spiritual infection and disease – in how we live and walk through this life and live by our beliefs, our trust in our creator. Let us be holy, because the L-RD our God is holy, and may we accomplish this through our redeemer, the Messiah Yeshua.

Shabbat Shalom.

Sermon – Parable of the Rich Man and Lazerus

April 26th, 2010 by Craig Hansen

Here’s my FINAL sermon from Beth Yeshua. Sorry it took so long to get it posted, but here’s the MP3 file so you can listen to it!

Shabbat Shalom.

We’ve spent the last several weeks looking at some of the parables of Yeshua, and I tried to pay special attention to some of those parables that have been a bit more overlooked or at least misunderstood. We started out with the Parable of the Talents, in which we learned that Yeshua desires us to go beyond tithing to regard all that the L-RD has given us as belonging to Him, and to use our wealth in this world to spread His kingdom, so that we have riches in the World to Come. Then we moved on to the Parable of Great Debt, which taught us to forgive from our hearts so that we could be forgiven by the same measure. After that, we looked at the Parable of the Weeds, which helped us understand how the presence of evil in the world came about and why it is allowed to continue. And last week, we looked at the Parable of the Widow and the Unjust Ruler, through which Yeshua was encouraging us to pray without giving up.

Today, we have one final parable to explore. As I prayed about which of Yeshua’s many parables to delve into today, I kept coming back to one in particular: the Parable of the Rich Man and Lazerus.

Now, many great teachers have spent time on this one; next to the Parable of the Lost – or some would say Prodigal – Son, it is one of Yeshua’s most often-quoted parables because of what it teaches about social justice. So, is there anything we can gain from looking at this parable more closely, that we haven’t heard before?

Let’s find out. First, let’s establish a common frame of reference for our discussion; let’s first read this parable in its entirety, which we find in:

LUKE 16:19-31
“There was a rich man who was dressed in purple and fine linen and lived in luxury every day. At his gate was laid a beggar named Lazarus, covered with sores and longing to eat what fell from the rich man’s table. Even the dogs came and licked his sores. The time came when the beggar died and the angels carried him to Abraham’s side. The rich man also died and was buried. In hell, where he was in torment, he looked up and saw Abraham far away, with Lazarus by his side. So he called to him, ‘Father Abraham, have pity on me and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am in agony in this fire.’ But Abraham replied, ‘Son, remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, while Lazarus received bad things, but now he is comforted here and you are in agony. And besides all this, between us and you a great chasm has been fixed, so that those who want to go from here to you cannot, nor can anyone cross over from there to us.’ He answered, ‘Then I beg you, father, send Lazarus to my father’s house, for I have five brothers. Let him warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment.’ Abraham replied, ‘They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to them.’ ‘No, father Abraham,’ he said, ‘but if someone from the dead goes to them, they will repent.’ He said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.’”

One of the reasons this parable is one of Yeshua’s most-quoted is because it seems clearer and easier to understand than, say, the Parable of the Talents or some of his other, more symbolic, parables. And indeed, there is much to be gained from simply reading the pashat of the text. It reminds us of the theme Yeshua taught on with the Parable of the Talents, that our riches in this world are not to be used exclusively for our own comfort, but to reach out to those in need so that the kingdom of the L-RD can be spread. It reiterates the theme that all that we have comes from the L-RD and it is not our own to do with as we please, but we are to use what we have been given to help those who have little – or nothing at all.

The parable has such a universal message, we can even find parallel teachings in the works of the rabbis. For example, we read this in:

BABAB BATHRA 10A
R. Yosef b. R. Yehoshua said, He was sick and had an out-of-body experience (where the soul briefly leaves the body and then returns.) His father asked him, “What did you see [in your out-of-body state]? He replied, “I saw a topsy-turvy world; those that are on top in this world [respected for their wealth and power] are at the bottom [in the World to Come]; and those that are on the bottom in this world [the poor and downtrodden], are on top.” His father told him, “[You did not see an upside-down world] but an unconfused, sensible world.”

This concept of the kingdom of heaven, the World to Come, as a place where everything seems upside down according to how things are in this life is a theme Yeshua uses more than once. And I don’t believe that Yeshua is just using this theme to make a point in a dramatic, attention-grabbing way. I believe He is speaking to us about a kingdom reality.

This can be an unsettling message, and it ought to be. There are many ways in which we can indulge ourselves and our own needs in this life while ignoring the needs of those around us. If we think that simply because we attend a congregation that seems to properly teach the Word of God, that we celebrate the L-RD feasts and festivals properly, and that we agree with all the right theology, that this will excuse us from ignoring those in need, well… maybe you’ll want to read through this parable again on your own when you go home today.

You see, all of us in one way or another are tempted to view Yeshua in the way that makes us feel the most comfortable, the most at ease with ourselves. While nearly all believers will say they want to know the L-RD, the truth is that it’s a lot easier to know Him when he seems to largely agree with us. However, this can lead to many false images of who Yeshua is, and ultimately of who God is. And that’s idolatry.

Yet the Yeshua of the New Covenant writings, the Yeshua of history, is not such a convenient figure. He’s not just a Pound Puppy doll we can hug when we’re feeling sad and blue! He’s not American, he’s not a Republican or a Democrat, and he’s not someone who just tells you what you want to hear. Nowhere is this more clear than in this Parable of the Rich Man and Lazerus.

Some teachers spend so much time trying to wipe away the confrontative truth Yeshua states so plainly that what Yeshua is actually saying in rather plain, simple language gets lost entirely. Ask yourself, how often have you hear some Bible teacher say something like this: “Well, what Yeshua REALLY means here is…”

There are times when Yeshua’s words do need further explanation. There are statements that have been poorly translated and require a deeper understanding of first-century times and culture, first-century Judaism, of the familiar sayings and idioms of that time and place.

The Parable of the Rich Man and Lazerus is not one of those instances, however. It’s message is clear. If you use all that God has given you only on yourself, you have received your reward in full; if you go through life not caring about the unmet needs of those around you, you may be unpleasantly surprised about how you will spend eternity in the World to Come.

So, why does Yeshua here teach this? Why does He seem to value social justice over other forms of religious devotion, such as a deep and devout belief? We get a clue from:

MATTHEW 9:12-13
On hearing this, Yeshua said, “It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick. But go and learn what this means: ‘I desire mercy, not sacrifice.’ For I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners.”

“I desire mercy, not sacrifice.” So what does that mean? Well, as we discussed last week, looking at the words used in this passage for mercy and sacrifice, what Yeshua is saying is that he desires compassion on the poor and needy with an intent to help them out of their troubles, far more than he desires self-denial, sacrifices or all our other outward expressions of religious devotion.

Let’s look at this another way.

We all know that it’s a good thing to fast, right? The discipline of denying ourselves so that we can dedicate ourselves to prayer is something many people teach. Yet how often, when you fast, do you gather up the food you would have been eating for that meal or that day, and donate it to a family that has no groceries, or bring it to a food shelf, so that the food you would have eaten is passed on to others in need of a meal?

Any hands? Not many, right?

You see, self-denial – sacrifice – can be a good thing. Fasting can be a good thing. But if we’re just storing up our goods and eating them later on, rather than passing them on to those who have no food at all, well… what do you think God is more concerned about? The fact that you went hungry by choice a few nights a year? Or is he more concerned that there are families who go hungry all the time and have no choice about it at all, and even when you were denying yourself, you did nothing to improve the lives of those in need around you?

See, you don’t have to be Bill Gates to feel convicted by this parable. You don’t need to be super-rich. All you have to be is selfish, concerned only about your own needs and never thinking of the needs of those around you. If that describes your behavior and your attitudes, then it don’t matter if you make $25,000 a year or $250,000 a year or $2.5 million a year, this parable is a warning you need to pay attention to.

Some people will, no doubt, feel unsettled by this. They might argue that helping the needy is purely the government’s job; that’s why they pay taxes. Others might argue that helping the needy with a handout creates a cycle of dependency on government, and teaching self-reliance through offering real jobs is a greater form of charity – though in a nation with double-digit unemployment rates, such an argument rings a bit hollow these days, doesn’t it?

But remember, Yeshua is not a Republican or a Democrat. How you help the needy is not as important as making sure you do help them in some way, making sure they don’t sit for a lifetime outside your gates, wishing for the scraps that fall from your table because you never once invite them in to share a meal, nor do you offer them a way out of their poverty.

Now, this is the pashat – the clear, direct, literal meaning of the Parable of the Rich Man and Lazerus. And if this is all that this parable had ever been used to teach, we could simply read it every now and again as a reminder to help our fellow man and that would be that.

However, there are some teachings out there, ways to interpret this parable, which are false and misleading, so I’d like to address one of those issues as well today.

One of the most disturbing ways of misinterpreting this parable is drawn from the last few verses, so let’s refresh our memory of what they actually say. We read this in:

LUKE 16:27-31
He answered, ‘Then I beg you, father, send Lazarus to my father’s house, for I have five brothers. Let him warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment.’ Abraham replied, ‘They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to them.’ ‘No, father Abraham,’ he said, ‘but if someone from the dead goes to them, they will repent.’ He said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.’”

This passage from the parable is where misunderstanding arises. Some teachers assert that in this passage, Yeshua is predicting the faithlessness of the Jewish people in the wake of His death and resurrection; that the hidden message of this parable is that Yeshua knew the Jewish people would reject him as Messiah, and that this parable is some indication of that.

Let me say this right now, and clearly: BA-LO-NEY!

Nothing could be further from the truth, and no teaching could be more out of step with the first-century reality of Yeshua, his ministry, and the ministry of His disciples, His talmudim.

First of all, let’s address the context: in this parable, Yeshua is clearly teaching about the differences in the rewards for the selfish rich and the needy poor. Why, then, would he suddenly, without skipping a beat, begin talking about the Jews and the Gentiles? He wouldn’t.

The argument goes that the rich man represents the Jews, who are rich in their closeness to God from the time of the patriarchs and the Torah until the arrival of Yeshua, and that Lazerus represents the Gentiles, who have been poor in their relationship with the L-RD until they are brought to Abraham’s bosom, basically being grafted in as a substitute for the Jewish people.

Let me say it again, and clearly: this interpretation of this parable is pure replacement theology. It is false and misleading and has no basis in the actual teachings and intent of Yeshua.

You see, those who teach from this perspective tend to forget that from the time of Yeshua until the ministry of Paul, in the first century, the movement of those who followed Yeshua as Messiah was a movement completely made up of Jewish believers. There were no Gentiles in it, until Peter met the Ethiopian eunuch, as recorded in the book of Acts.

Furthermore, many of the initial so-called Gentile converts were not complete heathens, but rather, Hellenized Jews who had spread throughout the world in the diaspora, following Israel’s capture by Babylon and the destruction of the first temple. Yes, there were also Gentile converts who were neither Jews nor Hellenized Jews; but the point is that, at least throughout the first century, the vast majority of Yeshua followers were Messianic Jews, not Gentile believers.

Interpreting this parable from a replacement theology standpoint is also not consistent with how Yeshua blatantly outlines His own vision of his mission while on this earth in other parts of the Gospel accounts. Take, for example:

MATTHEW 15:22-28
A Canaanite woman from that vicinity came to him, crying out, “Lord, Son of David, have mercy on me! My daughter is suffering terribly from demon-possession.” Yeshua did not answer a word. So his disciples came to him and urged him, “Send her away, for she keeps crying out after us.” He answered, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel.” The woman came and knelt before him. “Lord, help me!” she said. He replied, “It is not right to take the children’s bread and toss it to their dogs.” “Yes, Lord,” she said, “but even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their masters’ table.” Then Yeshua answered, “Woman, you have great faith! Your request is granted.” And her daughter was healed from that very hour.

Now, if you want a teaching that indicates Yeshua will extend the tents of Jacob to include faithful Gentiles, this passage is a far better one to look at, but notice what Yeshua says here about his ministry. He is here for the lost sheep of Israel, and it’s not right to take the children’s bread and toss it to the dogs. These statements indicate his role is that of a Jewish messiah first and foremost.

Yes, he ultimately does heal the Canannite woman’s child, but only after clarifying his Messianic role, and because of her great faith. There is no Gentile replacement of the Jewish people present in this teaching. God is merely doing as he has always done, allowing a “mixed multitude” of those who are faithful to the L-RD to attach themselves to Israel and be included in His promises. Yet this does not indicate a Gentile replacement of the Jews in the promises of God, merely an inclusion.

There are many examples of such inclusion, from Ruth to Tamar to Rahab to Ephraim and Manassah and more. Also the mixed multitude who joined the Israelites in the exodus from Egypt. There are many such cases. That is all that is indicated in our passage from Matthew; Yeshua shows mercy to a woman showing great faith, but does He dump his twelve Jewish talmudim and put this Canaanite woman in their place? Of course not.

If anything, this episode with the Canaanite woman merely supports the parable we looked at last week; because of the Canaanite woman’s persistence in trusting Yeshua to heal her daughter, He grants her request!

The nature of the L-RD is to show mercy to all who trust in Him from their hearts; yet His promises remain His promises, no matter what.

So, to return our focus to the Parable of the Rich Man and Lazerus, the question now becomes, “OK, so if these last few verses of the parable don’t indicate Gentile replacement of Israel, what are they about?”

Frankly, I believe what these last few verses indicate is the opposite of the replacement theology assumption. They are an indication by Yeshua that the written Torah, the prophets, and the writings are all sufficient to bring people the message of God’s salvation. After all, that is what Abraham says in this parable, right? “They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to them.”

And when the rich man suggests that having Lazerus return from the dead would lead them to repentance, Abraham corrects that assumption. “If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.”

And history has borne this out, hasn’t it? You see, this is not a teaching about Jew and Gentile, but about those who are willing to believe, and those who are not willing to believe.

Those who listen to and obey the L-RD will recognize the Messiah; as Yeshua has taught in John 10:27, “my sheep listen to my voice; I know them and they follow me.” But those who are unwilling to study the Torah or the prophets, those who are unwilling to believe – did Yeshua’s death and resurrection change everything for everyone? Are we all, throughout the Earth, believing in the L-RD, hearing from God directly and doing only what He commands us, never substituting His will for our own?

Unfortunately, no. You see, the deeper meaning of these last verses is not a teaching about the Jewish people in particular; it is a teaching about our fallen nature. Those of us who recognize our sin and agree with God seek him out, and look to the L-RD for our strength and salvation. What Yeshua is hinting at here is that His death and resurrection won’t by itself change all of humanity’s worst instincts. Those who are willing to believe didn’t need it as proof; God’s salvation is found in Moses and the prophets, because all they teach point toward Messiah Yeshua. But for those who didn’t believe in the first place, even Yeshua’s death and resurrection did not change their hardened hearts.

Is this idea that Yeshua puts forward through this parable, that even Moses and the prophets alone are enough to bring people to the L-RD, true? Yes, even Paul agrees with that, as we read in:

II TIMOTHY 3:16-17
All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.

We must keep in mind here that when Paul uses the term Scripture, he is referring to the same things as Yeshua was when he said, “Moses and the prophets.” Because, remember, the New Covenant writings hadn’t even been gathered together yet at the time Paul wrote these words; the Tenakh is the only thing Paul, as a first century Messianic Jew, could be referring to here.

The concept of the L-RD being our salvation is not a New Covenant concept alone. The L-RD is praised for being our salvation throughout the Tenakh, all of which points us toward the promise of that salvation, the Messiah who came first to suffer and die in our place in the way of Joseph, but who one day soon will be returning in the way of David, as the conquering king.

Let’s not be like the rich man or his brothers, failing to worship the L-RD despite having Moses and the prophets and – even more – having Yeshua, who has risen from the dead! Let’s instead allow the L-RD to enter our lives, take His place, rule us and be our God. Let’s allow Him to rule us so much that we do not turn a blind eye to those around us who are in need, but give of ourselves so that their needs our met in real, tangible ways.

So, let us join in the first mention of the word salvation – the Hebrew word yeshua – which points us toward our Messiah, as found in the victory song of Moses after the L-RD had the Red Sea swallow up the army of Pharaoh. His entire word has one unified and unique message: salvation through our Jewish Messiah, the Messiah Yeshua. Let us praise the L-RD together in:

EXODUS 15:1-2
Then Moses and the Israelites sang this song to the L-RD: “I will sing to the L-RD, for he is highly exalted. The horse and its rider he has hurled into the sea. The L-RD is my strength and my song; he has become my salvation (yeshua). He is my God, and I will praise him, my father’s God, and I will exalt him.

Shabbat Shalom.

Sermon: Parable of the Widow and the Unjust Ruler

April 26th, 2010 by Craig Hansen

Well, I finally made some time to sit down and re-type up the sermon I lost to a crashed flash drive early this year. It was my penultimate sermon at Beth Yeshua, but here it finally is. And I have an MP3 file here, so you can listen to it!

Shabbat Shalom.

So, we’ve been studying the parables of Yeshua in recent weeks and we began with the Parable of the Talents, in which we learned that the L-RD wants us to regard all the wealth He gives us in this world as belonging to Him, using it to spread the work of His kingdom, rather than on our own temporary comfort in this life. Then, in the Parable of the Great Debt, we came face-to-face with the responsibility we have to forgive others in the same way God has forgiven us, and we explored how, while that seems easy in concept, it’s not so easy when to comes to forgiving some of the gravest sins.

And then, last week, in the Parable of the Weeds, we discussed the problem presented by the presence of evil in the world; about why it exists, how it came to be, and how to remain forgiving, even to the unrepentant. We talked about how, when it comes to the unrepentant, while we must forgive them, it’s not to be a brainless forgiveness, and that in the case of the unrepentant only, it is best to forgive from a distance, because the preservation of life comes before all the rules of Torah.

So, what more is there to learn from Yeshua’s parables? Plenty. The parable I’d like to look at today is one of Yeshua’s less-explored parables, and it was suggested to me by someone here at Beth Yeshua. And I believe not only does it hold an important teaching for us, but it also ties in nicely with the themes of the recent parables we’ve been exploring.

It’s called the Parable of the Widow and the Unjust Judge, so let’s read it now so we all have a common frame of reference. It begins in:

LUKE 18:1-5
Then Yeshua told his disciples a parable to show them that they should always pray and not give up. He said: “In a certain town there was a judge who neither feared God nor cared about men. And there was a widow in that town who kept coming to him with the plea, ‘Grant me justice against my adversary.’ For some time he refused. But finally he said to himself, ‘Even though I don’t fear God or care about men, yet because this widow keeps bothering me, I will see that she gets justice, so that she won’t eventually wear me out with her coming!”

Now, some people can find this parable confusing, primarily because they draw too close a parallel between the unjust judge and the L-RD. While the principle Yeshua is teaching about draws such a parallel, it’s not meant to be a close parallel.

Why do I say this? Well, because the judge in this parable is unjust to begin with. Is the L-RD Himself unjust? Of course not. God Himself is the arbiter of all justice; He is the source of justice and He brings justice to everyone, doesn’t he?

So we have to be careful of letting out picture of God begin to reflect the picture of this unjust judge too closely, for the L-RD is not like him. The text has Yeshua describing this judge as not fearing God nor caring about his fellow man. Does this remind us of anything? It calls to mind for me:

MATTHEW 22:35-40
One of them, an expert in the law, tested him with this question: “Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?” Yeshua replied: “’Love the L-RD your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.”

So, we know Yeshua teaches these two commandments sum up the entire Torah: to fear God and to care about your neighbor. That’s it; that’s the Messiah’s summary of the entire Torah. So if we’re being told that this judge neither feared the L-RD nor cared about his neighbor, what are we really being told about him? That this ruler is far from… what? He’s far from the Torah, isn’t he? About as far from Torah as he can get! This is why he’s labeled an unjust ruler! Because he is ruling according to his own petty concerns and self-interests and decisions between right and wrong, rather than ruling based on the Torah of God. He is a portrait of the Torah-less world!

So who or what does that remind you of? Remember last week, when we studied the Parable of the Weeds? In that parable, we learned that the wheat represents those of us who are in Yeshua, part of the kingdom of the L-RD, who obey the Torah and follow its instruction; yet we are intertwined with the weeds – those who are children of darkness, sons of the Adversary of the L-RD, workers of evil and injustice. And we read that Yeshua taught that evil cannot be purged until the time of the harvest – that final Yom Kippur, the Day of Judgment – when the good crops will be separated from the weeds, and the weeds will be burned up, while the wheat will be brought into the master’s storehouse.

So we saw that we are in a world filled with both children of God and children of the Adversary. The children of the Adversary are without Torah; and we know that while we must forgive them when they do evil against us, that it would also be unwise to trust them when they are unrepentant, giving them an opportunity to do evil to us again.

That raised the question of how do we interact with those who are children of the Adversary. I mean, it’s not like any of us have a scorecard, is it? We can’t walk down the street, or even a church aisle, and say, “righteous,” “righteous,” “unrighteous.” Can we? Of course not.

And the sad truth is that the world we are in is usually ruled by those who are Torah-less. So one of the very real questions about getting through this life is, how can we find justice in a world ruled by the unjust? This parable gives us a clue: persistence, it appears, pays off. The unjust ruler of this parable doesn’t rule justly because he fears the L-RD and agrees with the woman who was wronged; he rules in her favor because she never gives up, never surrenders, never ceases in insisting that he rule rightly on the matter. He does what is right, basically, just to get her off his case!

So how does Yeshua interpret this parable? Let’s read on:

LUKE 18:6-8
And the Lord said, “Listen to what the unjust judge says. And will not God bring about justice for his chosen ones, who cry out to him day and night? Will he keep putting them off? I tell you, he will see that they get justice, and quickly. However, when the Son of Man comes, will he find faith on the earth?”

Now this is where we can easily slip into misunderstanding. This is where the connection is made between the nature of God and the nature of the unjust judge. But what is Yeshua really saying here? He’s saying that if even an unjust judge will render a just verdict through the persistence of a widow, how much more will the L-RD, who desires justice and to do what is right, answer the righteous requests of those who bring their concerns to Him?

Of course, that’s not that hard. It’s relatively easy to understand. But it does raise a question, which the person who suggested this parable asked: “So, is this parable teaching us that if we merely bug God enough, He’ll give us whatever we want, like some genie in a magic lamp? Is God no better than us, changing His mind simply because He’s being pestered about something and wants to get someone off His back?”

As I’ve taught often the last few weeks, Scripture reveals Scripture. If you want to understand one verse or passage, study everything around it and eventually the meaning will become clear. Right? So let’s start setting this parable in context to gain our best response to this question.

First and foremost, we ought to understand the word “persistence.” You know, in the NIV, some form of the word “persist” appears only ten times; in only one of these is the word given a positive connotation. In one other appearance, it results in the same effect Yeshua describes in the parable.

We find this positive mention in:

ROMANS 2:7
To those who by persistence in doing good seek glory, honor and immortality, he will give eternal life.

And we find the instance in which the effect of persistence is the same as Yeshua describes in this parable, in:

II KINGS 2:16-17
“Look,” they said, “we your servants have fifty able men. Let them go and look for your master. Perhaps the Spirit of the L-RD has picked him up and set him down on some mountain or in some valley.” “No,” Elisha replied, “do not send them.” But they persisted until he was too ashamed to refuse. So he said, “Send them.” And they send fifty men, who searched for three days but did not find him.

Now, this last instance here is not entirely positive. Remember, Elisha the prophet is right to tell his men not to go looking for his master, Elijah. Why? Because Elisha himself saw Elijah taken up to heaven. He knew they were not going to find Elijah, but he finally gives into their demand to search because they simply won’t let it rest.

Now, the other eight instances in which some form of the word “persistence” is used, it is always negative in connotation, referring to how people persist in their sin or their disobedience to the L-RD.

So I thought it might be handy to look at the Hebrew and Greek words that are translated as “persist,” but what I found is there is not a precise word in Hebrew or Greek that is always reliably translated that way. In fact, I found at least two different Greek words and two different Hebrew words that are translated as “persist,” but also that these words are not reliably translated that way. They are the Greek words epimeno (ep-ee-men’-o) and hupomone (hoop-om-on-ay’), as well as the Hebrew words patsar (paw-tsar’) and yalak (yaw-lak’).

So persist as we understand it in English is used to translate more than one Biblical word. So I began to look for parallel concepts to persistence, ideas that captured the meaning of persistence, even if it was not translated that way.

Suddenly, I found more positive references to the concept of never giving up, of persistence, than I found when looking for that precise English word. We find one such example in:

PSALM 72:1, 15B
Endow the king with your justice, O God, the royal son with your righteousness … May people ever (persistently) pray for him and bless him all day long.

We also find this in:

II CHRONICLES 6:14
He said: “O L-RD, God of Israel, there is no God like you in heaven or on earth – you who keep your covenant of love with your servants who continue (persist) wholeheartedly in your way.

So persist means to continue, to so something without ceasing to do it, to never give up. This agrees with what Luke tells us was the purpose of Yeshua’s parable, which was, “to show them that they should always pray and not give up.”

So, to get back to our question: Does this mean that if we pray without ceasing, that God can and will actually change His mind? There is no quick answer to this; to understand what Yeshua is teaching us better, we must first understand the nature of prayer itself.

So, what is prayer, really? Well, is it simply taking time to communicate with God. To, as Moses did in the Tent of Meeting, come face-to-face with our Maker. That is ideally what prayer is meant to be. As believers, in fact, we are commanded to pray, as Yeshua Himself teaches in:

LUKE 6:27-28
“But I tell you who hear me: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you.”

James, the brother of Yeshua, teaches us further about the benefits and purposes of prayer in:

JAMES 5:13-18
Is any one of you in trouble? He should pray. Is anyone happy? Let him sing songs of praise. Is any one of you sick? He should call the elders of the church to pray over him and anoint him with oil in the name of the L-RD. And the prayer offered in faith will make the sick person well; the L-RD will raise him up. If he has sinned, he will be forgiven. Therefore confess your sins to each other and pray for each other so that you may be healed. The prayer of a righteous man is powerful and effective. Elijah was a man just like us. He prayed earnestly that it would not rain, and it did not rain on the land for three and a half years. Again he prayed, and the heavens gave rain, and the earth produced its crops.

What James teaches us here is loaded with important concepts on an effective prayer life, but it’s easy to miss the important details. We all love to hear that prayer is powerful and effective, but too often we read right past one of the most important words in the passage. What does James actually teach? He teaches that, “The prayer of a righteous man is powerful and effective.”

A righteous man. Not just anyone, not even just any believer. But the prayer of the righteous is powerful and effective. And you see, that’s where many of us can trip up. That’s why so many who are believers in this country feel like they have ineffective prayer lives, or complain about God not answering their prayers. Because it is the prayers of the righteous that will be answered, not the prayers of just anyone.

So can you, for example, ignore the Torah commands of God and expect your prayers to be answered? Can you persist in habitual sin and expect God to grant your request? Can you lead a life of casual, only-when-it’s-convenient faith, come home from, say, a night of hard drinking, and pray to the L-RD for some blessing and expect Him to listen and respond affirmatively?

No.

God is not an emergency parachute for when you’re in a tight spot and need to save your butt, only to neglect Him at all other times. God desires to have a relationship with us, a give-and-take relationship, and part of being able to speak with Him as Moses did in the Tent of Meeting – face-to-face – is that we must live at least to the minimum standards set down for us in the Torah; furthermore, we should live to a standard far above that, striving to walk as Yeshua walked, in obedience to the L-RD, obeying everything that was commanded of Him.

Does this mean the L-RD never listens and responds to the prayers of the unrighteous? Not at all! He hears the prayers of repentance offered up by those lost in their sin all the time! But think about it! That repentance needs to come first, just to clear the table!

If you have a relative who, the only time they gave you the time of day was when they needed something, and the rest of the time they were out bad-mouthing you and ruining your reputation, and even when they asked for your something they wouldn’t apologize for how they’ve wronged you – how long would you keep giving them what they ask for?

You see, the kind of righteousness James is talking about here isn’t some unreachable, impossible standard; as he wrote, “Elijah was a man just like us.” So was Moses, for that matter, as we discussed in last week’s Torah commentary. But both men were humble enough to know they were unworthy, in and of themselves. They relied on God’s truth to create their righteousness and they obeyed His commands in gratitude. They agreed with God and relied on Him and that became their righteousness.

That’s a righteousness that doesn’t come from ignoring whatever commands you don’t like or don’t fit what you do; it’s a righteousness that clears the table and allows you to speak with God as Moses did, as Yeshua did. That’s when God starts listening: when you’re not fighting with Him anymore over what the truth is. That’s when the prayer of the righteous becomes powerful and effective, because you become echad with the maker of the universe! Not one person, but of one mind and one spirit with Him, not struggling against Him anymore.

Yeshua instructs us on some more mistakes to guard against when we pray. We read this in:

MATTHEW 6:5-8
“And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by men. I tell you the truth, they have received their reward in full. But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. And when you pray, do not keep on babbling like pagans, for they think they will be heard because of their many words. Do not be like them, for your Father knows what you need before you ask Him.

And Yeshua didn’t just tell others one thing and do something else Himself. He modeled this in His own walk with His Father, as we read in, for example:

MATTHEW 14:23
After he had dismissed them, he went up on a mountainside by himself to pray. When evening came, he was there alone,

So now we have a basic understanding of how to pray effectively. So the question becomes, let’s assume we’re doing all this right. Let’s assume we’re relying on His righteousness and not fighting with God over the truth; we’re repenting of our sin, we’re face-to-face with God, and we’re talking with Him. Can we, even at this point, change the mind of the creator of the universe? Can we, simply by badgering Him, get whatever we ask?

Let’s first take a look at the prayer live of someone who only had the appearance of righteousness; who went through all the right steps and claimed to have the ear of the L-RD. Let’s see what Balak found out about prayer, as we read in:

NUMBERS 23:19-20
God is not a man, that he should lie, nor a son of man, that he should change his mind. Does he speak and then not act? Does he promise and not fulfill? I have received a command to bless; he has blessed, and I cannot change it.

A similar statement is expressed in I Samuel 15:29. This testimony about God and His nature is true! God doesn’t lie. He always is truthful and all truth comes from Him. Balak performs all the right steps, does everything the Hebrews do, and yet he could not curse the Jewish people; he could not move the L-RD to cease from blessing the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and in this prophecy, Balak is testifying to that fact; man cannot change the mind of God in a way that makes God break His promises. The L-RD will never promise, then fail to fulfill because someone else prays for Him not to.

Yet it’s important to remember Balak is not a righteous man; as he’s testifying to the L-RD’s goodness to Balaam, Balak is there trying to curse Israel against the L-RD’s wishes. The L-RD allows Balak to do this, but He does not answer Balaam’s prayer.

Why?

Because part of the prayer of the righteous being powerful and effective is that the righteous never pray for the L-RD to do something outside of His own will. The righteous never pray for the L-RD to violate His own promises.

So, even a man like Balak, who has the appearance of righteousness, can pray and yet the L-RD will not make those prayers either powerful or effective; because the prayers are not righteous.

But is that the end of the subject? Is the L-RD never swayed? Well, let’s remember this episode from:

GENESIS 18:22-26
The men turned away and went toward Sodom, but Abraham remained standing before the L-RD. Then Abraham approached Him and said: “Will you sweep away the righteous with the wicked? What if there are fifty righteous people in the city? Will you really sweep it away and not spare the place for the sake of the fifty righteous people in it? Far be it from You to do such a thing – to kill the righteous with the wicked, treating the righteous and the wicked alike. Far be it from you! Will not the Judge of all the earth do right?” The L-RD said, “If I find fifty righteous people in the city of Sodom, I will spare the whole place for their sake.”

Now, we should all remember how the rest of this story goes. Abraham is bold in his prayer life with the L-RD and keeps asking Him for His mercy for forty, for thirty, for twenty and then for ten righteous left in the city. Why did Abraham stop at ten? Because that comprises a minyan – the minimum number of people required to start a congregation.

Did the end result change? No. Sodom and Gomorrah fell, but only because there could not be found even ten righteous who were willing to turn from their sin, repent and follow the L-RD and His commands.

Yet if they had found ten righteous, would the city have been spared? You bet; and it would have been spared because of Abraham’s prayer life, his communication with the L-RD. The prayer of the righteous is powerful and effective. And we know this is true because there are times when the L-RD, in the wilderness, wishes to slay the children of Israel for their unrighteousness, and it was the prayer life of Moses, praying a righteous prayer for the L-RD to protect His name among the Gentiles, that caused the L-RD not to slay the children of Israel and instead offer them a path to forgiveness.

You see, God never repents because God never sins where He has to repent. But can the prayer of the righteous move God to change? In some ways, yes. We read an example of this in:

JONAH 4:3
He prayed to the L-RD, “O L-RD, is this not what I said when I was still at home? That is why I was so quick to flee to Tarshish. I knew that you are a gracious and compassionate God, slow to anger and abounding in love, a God who relents from sending calamity.

This is where the prayers of the righteous can have an impact. When we pray for God to relent from judgment, to show mercy to the unrighteous, to give time for repentance. Not when we pray outside of the will of God, or for the L-RD to violate His will or His nature, but when we pray for the L-RD to be who He is, to live up to His name and show His greatness.

That’s when the L-RD moves. That’s when the prayer of the righteous is powerful and effective, because we’re remaining in the L-RD and His will. That’s the kind of prayer life we should want. The kind of walk with the L-RD we should want. That’s when Messiah Yeshua reigns and gives us the ability to forgive, even to forgive the unrepentant and yet stay safe. That’s when we rest in Him.

Shabbat Shalom.

Trimming things up

April 17th, 2010 by Craig Hansen

I reached a new benchmark, though I’m still yo-yoing on my weight loss journey. I hit a new low of 229.4 pounds this week, though I gained a pound or too back and now am dropping it again as the week wore on. Still, if I can stay near 229.4 and go lower eventually, that’s nice because that makes my weight loss so far 23 pounds even and counting.

I wish I had the firmness in my diet to lose weight more swiftly, but at least what I lose, I am mostly keeping off, save for a two-three pound variance at any given time. I’m still headed in the right direction and that’s what counts, not the speed with which I lose it. Losing weight slowly but keeping it off is better than losing weight quickly, then gaining it back quickly.

But there are no shortcuts for me; with my high blood pressure, I can’t take those paths to quicker weight loss; I have to lose it the hard but honest way.