Image 01

MessianicMusings.com

Not quite Jewish, not quite Christian … totally commited to Torah and Messiah Yeshua.

Posts Tagged ‘commentary’

My Tazriah-Metsora 2010 Commentary

Saturday, April 17th, 2010

Well, I made a successful return to Torah commentaries this Shabbat. Hopefully what I shared was enlightening. You can now all judge for yourselves. Here’s my 2010 Tazriah-Metsora commentary.

Shabbat Shalom.

This week, we have a double portion for our parashah. It includes Tazriah, a Hebrew word that means, “She bears seed” or “She conceives,” as well as the portion known as “Metsora,” a Hebrew word that means, “Infected one,” or “diseased one.” This double portion covers Leviticus chapter 12 through Leviticus chapter 15.

Now, this week’s reading covers such topics as pregnancy and childbirth, skin diseases, bodily discharges and the laws surrounding purification from all of these afflictions. But before we delve into that, I want to share a word of encouragement from this week’s portion for a select portion of this congregation – and you’ll know who you are in just a moment.

Now, some of you might remember the 1980s. One of the big trends back then was custom T-shirt shops. You could walk in, select the size and color of T-shirt you liked best, and then select just about any kind of saying or cartoon that you wanted and it would be added to the shirt while you waited.

I’ll always remember one we got my father. It’s not a Biblical saying, but it might sound like it. The t-shirt read, “God made only a few perfect heads. All the rest, he covered with hair.”

I thought it was pretty funny back then, too. Of course, those of you who’ve known me for a few years now will testify that, as the years go on, my head’s getting a little closer to perfect all the time.

Yet the word of encouragement for those of us who are a bit closer to perfect atop our heads comes to us from:

Leviticus 13:40-41
If a man’s hair has fallen from his scalp, he is bald; but he is clean. If a man’s hair has fallen off the front part of his scalp, he is forehead-bald; but he is clean.

So, that’s good news, right? Some of us may be balding, men, but at least we’re clean! Now, joking aside, the passage does go on to say that if baldness is accompanied by sores of various kinds, it can indeed indicate ritual uncleanness. Of course, so can a whole lot of other things. And what we see in this week’s double-portion is that there is so much ritual uncleanness in the world, it’s almost impossible to avoid!

Yet it’s important to note that ritual uncleanness is not always the same as sinfulness – though, at times, it can be. For example, that which is unclean can often be remedied in this week’s parashah by simply bathing and separating oneself from the community until evening. Can water grant remission of sins? No, the Torah is clear that blood must be shed for sins to be pardoned. So if some types of uncleanness can be remedied by washing with water, they must not be sources of sin, but a simple lack of purity.

Yet even this insight misses something more important. What both of these portions talk about is what? Ceremonial uncleanness, right? As we read, for example, in:

Leviticus 12:1-4
The L-RD said to Moses, “Say to the Israelites: ‘A woman who becomes pregnant and gives birth to a son will be ceremonially unclean for seven days, just as she is unclean during her monthly period. On the eighth day the boy is to be circumcised. Then the woman must wait thirty-three days to be purified from her bleeding. She must not touch anything sacred or go to the sanctuary until the days of her purification are over.

So you see, many of these purity laws have to do with one’s fitness to enter the Temple … the Tent of Meeting … and since that Temple no longer stands, it would seem many of these laws are of limited relevance and use to us today. Right?

Not so fast. Because while the laws of ritual purity were specific to Jewish people living in the Land, and relevant to entering the Temple or the Tent of Meeting, they also have a more symbolic, spiritual aspect to them.

Let’s start by looking at the word for impurity or infection. The Hebrew word for our second portion is “metsorah.” It is derived from two root words. The first, “motzi,” means “source or well-spring.” The second, “ra,” means “evil.” So the word “metsorah,” in addition to meaning “infected one” or “diseased one,” could also be said to mean “well-spring or source of evil.”

When one thinks about this, it begins to make sense. After all, on a spiritual level, what causes infection or disease in our spirit? Evil, right? Specifically, exposure to evil or a source of evil. And often, simple exposure is enough.

We see the truth in this in the story of the fall of man. What happens when Adam and Chavah are exposed to the lies of the serpent? They become infected, diseased with doubt. Doubt about what? Whether to trust in the words of the L-RD, or the words of the serpent. Exposure alone to that doubt is enough to produce what comes next: rebellion against God’s only command at that time, as they eat of the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil.

In the same way, we can see how simple exposure to impurity can infect us in our daily walk, in our witness, in how we view, understand and even explain our faith in the L-RD to others.

For example, what does the Tenakh teach us about where to invest our faith and trust? We read this in:

Proverbs 3:5-6
Trust in the L-RD with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding; in all your ways acknowledge him, and he will make your paths straight.

This is what the L-RD asks of us, right? To simply put our trust in Him, rather than our own understanding of things. We can all agree on that, right?

Yet we live in a world that is full of people who don’t do that; who put their trust in their own understanding, rather than in the L-RD. Still with me? Good.

One of the most prevalent theories out there in the world today, in the understanding of men, is the theory of evolution.

Like atmospheric yeast, it’s out there in the world, like it or not. And this idea that man was not created but evolved from lower life-forms, and all the ideas that spring forth from that core theory, such as that the earth is, as scientist Carl Sagan always said, “billions and billions of years old,” rather than nearing the end of the six thousand years of human history spoken of in the Bible, has been entrenched in public education and the public mind so firmly for so long, that the fact is that today, many believers would prefer to cast aside the first few chapters of Genesis in an attempt to lure those who view the world through evolutionary, so-called scientific eyes, than to even attempt to believe what God has revealed about the nature of His creation.

The rationalization many use is that they “don’t want a few chapters in one book of the Bible” to be a barrier to someone entering the kingdom of heaven. “It’s not important enough,” they’ll claim.

Yet, is that what we’re called to do? Are we to stake claim only in the words of the Torah that make sense to the unbelieving? Or are we to simply trust in the L-RD with all of our hearts and lean not on our own understanding?

And that’s what simple exposure can do! Simply by being in the same atmosphere as this well-spring of evil, we become infected, diseased in our own thinking. We start to change what we believe to make it easier for the unbelieving to accept, rather than simply standing firm in our trust in the L-RD… which is what the L-RD has called us to do!

This is just an example. There are many. Perhaps the well-spring of evil in your home is broadcast television, which contains so many shows that are rooted in evil and untruths that can infect you, make you impure in your simple, commanded trust in God. Perhaps for your children, it’s videogames that is the source of infection. It could be an unhealthy amount of time spent on the Internet, rather than in the Word of the L-RD.

It could even be something as simple as evil speech – known as lashon horah in Hebrew – the practice of speaking of people in a way meant to diminish them in the eyes of others, even if what you’re saying is true. If the intention is to diminish rather than to build up, it’s lashon horah and it can destroy a sense of safety and trust in a community.

Now, perhaps, we begin to see the pieces come together from what seems on the surface like a rather dry and boring pair of Torah portions. For you see, for all these detailed instructions on how to rid oneself of impurity, there is one remedy that is never recommended. Whether an impurity is a result of sin, or a simpler impurity that isn’t necessarily sin but does make you ceremonially impure – in other words, unfit to come before the L-RD – one solution that the Torah NEVER endorses is to do nothing about it!

That’s amazing to think about, isn’t it? I mean, you read about how touching a mildewed cloth makes you impure, but the solution is to wash and wait until evening, the start of a new day, and one is tempted to think: well, then that’s not sin! Why is the Torah being so nitpicky? If it’s not sin, why all the fuss over simple impurity.

Well, it’s because while God does desire for us to come to Him through Messiah Yeshua and experience His yeshua – His salvation – he isn’t done with us once the sin is dealt with. God wants us to live a life far above that minimum standard required to attain eternal residence in His kingdom! He wants us to, as he repeats throughout the Torah, including just before this week’s parashah in:

Leviticus 11:45
I am the L-RD who brought you up out of Egypt to be your God. Therefore, be holy, because I am holy.

Holiness – not just freedom from sin but freedom from all impurity – is the nature of God. To experience intimacy with God, we must strive to be like him. Not just forgiven of our sins, but pursuing holiness, which is the lack of all metsorahs – the lack of any sources or well-springs of evil in our lives.

Let us, therefore, pursue lives that are holy – free of all spiritual infection and disease – in how we live and walk through this life and live by our beliefs, our trust in our creator. Let us be holy, because the L-RD our God is holy, and may we accomplish this through our redeemer, the Messiah Yeshua.

Shabbat Shalom.

My Acherai Mot-K’doshim Commentary

Monday, May 4th, 2009

It has nothing to do with computer memory, but everything to do with timing… as promised, audio versions of my commentaries will soon be up on my site, but they’re not quite ready yet, including this one. Check back later this week and it ought to be up… I’ll start with the most recent commentaries and work backward. In the meantime, here’s the text version of my commentary for Acherai Mot-K’doshim. Or listen to it!

Shabbat Shalom.

Our parashahs for today are Acharei Mot or “After the death” and K’doshim or “Holy ones,” covers Leviticus chapters 16 through 20. As our reading begins, the L-RD declares a new appointed time for Moses and the children of Israel to celebrate: The Day of Atonement, otherwise known as Yom Kippur.

Interestingly, this appointed time is declared, we are told, in the wake of the death of Aaron’s two sons, Nadab and Abihu, who perished when they offered unauthorized fire before the L-RD, contrary to His commands. We read this in:

Leviticus 16:1-2
The L-RD spoke to Moses after the death of the two sons of Aaron who died when they approached the L-RD. The L-RD said to Moses: “Tell your brother Aaron not to come whenever he chooses into the Most Holy Place behind the curtain in front of the atonement cover on the ark, or else he will die, because I appear in the cloud over the atonement cover.

This passage may give us a further clue as to why Nadab and Abihu perished as they did. Here, the L-RD tells Moses that Aaron is not to enter the Holy of Holies – or, as the NIV translates it, the Most Holy Place – any time the mood strikes him, or he will die. It can reasonably be inferred that this is part of why Nadab and Abihu perished; they did not simply offer unauthorized fire, but apparently in offering it, did so in the Holy of Holies without making the proper preparations for entering there. And why could no one – even Aaron – enter the Holy of Holies whenever they wanted to, even as close as they were to the L-RD? Because, we are told, the presence of God dwells there and, as we learned last week, not only can the L-RD not allow any sin in His presence, but neither can he allow anything unclean in His presence.

So in establishing this appointed time for dealing with cleansing the people of Israel of their sin, the L-RD is showing His concern for the loss of Nadab and Abihu by establishing some rules to ensure that such a loss of life might not be repeated.

Now, the Day of Atonement is a very important part of the Fall Festival season. It comes seven days after the Jewish New Year, Rosh haShanah, which is two days long but is called “one long day” because no one knows exactly when the New Moon will appear over that two-day stretch. The importance of the Day of Atonement is spelled out in the L-RD’s command to observe it in this week’s reading, beginning in:

Leviticus 16:29-31
“This is to be a lasting ordinance for you: On the tenth day of the seventh month you must deny yourselves and not do any work–whether native-born or an alien living among you–because on this day atonement will be made for you, to cleanse you. Then, before the L-RD, you will be clean from all your sins. It is a Sabbath of rest, and you must deny yourselves; it is a lasting ordinance.

Now, to “deny yourselves” here means that the Day of Atonement is to be a day of fasting. No food shall be prepared or eaten during this time, and with that time now freed up, prayer, repentance and drawing closer to the L-RD becomes the order of the day.

We can learn more about the significance of the Day of Atonement from the sages.

R. Kruspedai said in the name of R. Johanan:
Three books are opened [in heaven] on New Year, one for the thoroughly wicked, one for the thoroughly righteous, and one for the intermediate. The thoroughly righteous are forthwith inscribed definitively in the book of life; the thoroughly wicked are forthwith inscribed definitively in the book of death; the doom of the intermediate is suspended from New Year till the Day of Atonement; if they deserve well, they are inscribed in the book of life; if they do not deserve well, they are inscribed in the book of death.

So, there are seven days between Rosh haShanah and Yom Kippur. And we know the fall festivals are a teaching of the second appearance of Messiah, so how does this all fit together?

Well, Rosh haShanah is also known as the feast of trumpets, and it signifies the catching away of the righteous, the day when we shall go to meet the Messiah Yeshua in the air. We also know that Yom Kippur points to the time of the Great Throne of Judgment, when all who lived will come before the L-RD and be judged according to their deeds. Yet these two appointed times are separated by seven days. Is there significance to these seven days? Of course there is.

You see, these seven days symbolize the time of Jacob’s Trouble – that time which Christians call the Tribulation. And we know that the Tribulation period lasts seven years, after which the judgment begins, kicking off Messiah’s 1,000-year reign on Earth.

So what we have here is indeed a perfect picture of Messiah Yeshua’s return, and in this Day of Atonement, we receive part of the picture of what that day will be like. It is a time, as the Jewish tradition I just shared reflected, when those who are in the book of the Intermediate will either be included with the righteous in the book of life, or included with the wicked in the book of death. They get those seven years, that “week,” and then their time runs out.

There are no more fence-sitters in the reign of Messiah, and the Day of Atonement is when the fate of all – including the intermediate – is decided.

Now, there are some specifics surrounding the offerings for the Day of Atonement which set it apart from all other holidays, most notably the two goats and how they are handled. We read about this in:

Leviticus 16:8-10
He is to cast lots for the two goats—one lot for the L-RD and the other for the scapegoat. Aaron shall bring the goat whose lot falls to the L-RD and sacrifice it for a sin offering. But the goat chosen by lot as the scapegoat shall be presented alive before the L-RD to be used for making atonement by sending it into the desert as a scapegoat.

Now, when most people teach about this sacrifice, they compare this scapegoat to Messiah Yeshua, but that is simply not the case. You really have to dig into the Hebrew language and culture to understand what’s going on here. The Hebrew word used here, translated as scapegoat, is AzAzel.

5799 `aza’zel
• AV – scapegoat 4; 4
1) entire removal, scapegoat
1a) refers to the goat used for sacrifice for the sins of the people

Who is AzAzel? Well, in the limits of a commentary, I can’t go into as much detail as I might like, but Stan has an extensive teaching on this as part of his Feasts of the L-RD series. Briefly, however, we learn the following from:

Encyclopedia Judaica
The great majority of moderns regard Azazel as the personal name of a demon thought to live in the wilderness. The name of a supernatural being mentioned in connection with the ritual of the Day of Atonement. After Satan, for whom he was in some degree a preparation, Azazel enjoys the distinction of being the most mysterious extra human character in sacred Literature.

So, if AzAzel is indeed a name of the Adversary of the L-RD, why would there be any provision made for him in the ceremony of the Day of Atonement? After all, we are to worship the L-RD and have no other gods before him, so what’s with this goat for AzAzel?

Well, first we must pay attention to what is done with this goat. Like all sin sacrifices, these goats are to be a year old and without defect. That being the case, it might even be hard to tell the two goats apart; they could look nearly alike. One is cast for the L-RD and sacrificed as a sin offering; the other is not slain, but is used to make atonement by sending it into the desert.

Now, which of these two goats appears to resemble Messiah more? The goat declared to be for the L-RD and offered as a sin offering? Or the goat declared to be for AzAzel and sent out to perish in the desert? I don’t know about you, but I think the first goat sounds a lot more like Yeshua to me.

So what is the significance of this goat for AzAzel? Well, both goats are the same age, probably about the same size, they look the same and both are without defect; yet one is for the L-RD and the other for this demon, AzAzel. Well, who is it in sacred literature that would appear to be almost the same as the Messiah, but who is destined for destruction, rather than for the remission of sins?

How about the false Messiah?

So, how strong is this connection between the goat for AzAzel and the false Messiah? We read this in:

II Thessalonians 2:3
Don’t let anyone deceive you in any way, for that day will not come until the rebellion occurs and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the man doomed to destruction.

Like the Man of Lawlessness spoken of here, the goat for AzAzel is doomed to destruction. His presence in the ceremony is the same as any other element; it is a shadow of what is to come, a shadow of the false Messiah and his fate, which is destruction.

So, it won’t be Yom Kippur for another five months or so. Yet what can we take away from this teaching on the Day of Atonement at this time? Well, we know that the time of Yeshua’s return is drawing closer all the time. Some of those we know are inscribed in the book of life, some in the book of death, and some are in the book of the intermediate.

Perhaps the most important lesson to draw from this is to know that, when that final Day of Atonement arrives, there will be no one left who is in the book of the intermediate. This is spoken of in:

Revelation 3:15-16
I know your deeds, that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were either one or the other! So, because you are lukewarm—neither hot nor cold—I am about to spit you out of my mouth.

While the Day of Atonement and all of the fall festivals teach of Yeshua’s return, it is the fate of the intermediate, the lukewarm, that is perhaps most critical. The lukewarm are those who know enough about the L-RD, his Messiah, the Torah and all the L-RD’s commands to know what is right, but who do not obey all that the L-RD has commanded them.

As the fate of Nadab and Abihu should teach us, it is a dangerous thing to dwell among the intermediate. I mean, you can’t be in Messiah if he’s just spit you out, can you? And if you’re not in Messiah, then your fate is the same as Nadab and Abihu. They shared in the fate of AzAzel, suffering sudden destruction. Yet the L-RD has provided a Day of Atonement, a Messiah, a way for others to avoid that destruction. Amen?

Shabbat Shalom.

My Tazriah-Metsora Commentary

Tuesday, April 28th, 2009

You won’t get free life insurance quotes here at MessianicMusings.com. There are better sites for that. Here, we’re all about Torah and Messiah Yeshua. Here’s my Tazriah-Metsora commentary. Or listen to it! Shalom.

Shabbat Shalom.

Our parashahs for today are Tazriah or “She bears seed” and Metsora or “Infected one,” covers Leviticus 12:1 through Leviticus 15:33. Now, this week’s reading covers such topics as pregnancy and childbirth, skin diseases, bodily discharges and the laws surrounding purification from all of these afflictions. I know, I know, it’s fascinating stuff, right?

Well, the point these two readings seem to drive home is this: there are plenty of things that make you unclean. Did you notice that simply touching a mildew-y cloth can make you unclean? Or marital relations between a husband and a wife can make you unclean? Or even sitting on a piece of furniture that has been used by a person with a skin disease, or even a woman who is going through her monthly cycle can also make you unclean?

Now, there are detailed in this week’s readings various ways to restore oneself to a clean state, but there’s an important distinction to be made here, and that is this: clean and unclean are not necessarily the same as sinful and holy.

In fact, what I think this week’s reading makes clear is that uncleanness is the natural state of affairs for life in this world. Let’s take a look at an example of this in:

Leviticus 12:4-5
Then the woman must wait thirty-three days to be purified from her bleeding. She must not touch anything sacred or go to the sanctuary until the days of her purification are over. If she gives birth to a daughter, for two weeks the woman will be unclean, as during her period. Then she must wait sixty-six days to be purified from her bleeding.

So, following childbirth, the mother is considered unclean for thirty-three days if she has a son, and for twice as long – sixty-six days – if she has a daughter. Why should this state of uncleanness last twice as long if she has a boy rather than a girl? For one reason only: it’s what God commanded.

But the point is, childbirth is part of life in the world. Should a husband not even give his wife a kiss on the cheek for a month or two after she gives birth, just to avoid becoming unclean? There might be some unhappy wives if that were the case.

See, a state of uncleanness and a state of sin are not always the same thing. Think about it. Let’s say you’re working in the kitchen and your hand slips and you cut your thumb. Blood seeps out. Guess what? That’s a bodily emission and you’re now ritually unclean! Does this mean you’ve sinned against the L-RD? I hope not! Does this mean you need to repent for cutting yourself? I don’t think so. But do you want to go before the L-RD in the Tent of Meeting – or, to service here – with your hand and clothes covered in blood from dealing with that cut? Probably not, right?

And if someone pats him on the shoulder or sits on a chair he sat on, they’re unclean, too. So what must one do to become clean again? We read this, for example, in:

Leviticus 15:7
“‘Whoever touches the man who has a discharge must wash his clothes and bathe with water, and he will be unclean till evening.

Does that sound like a sin issue? Remember, according to the Torah, simple water cannot cleanse sin; forgiveness requires the shedding of blood. So being unclean does not always equal being in a state of sin; the remedy is different.

Let’s be clear here that there is more than one type of uncleanness. In this case, we are talking about ceremonial uncleanness, which is related to the Tent of Meeting, the Temple, and situations in which one is coming into the presence of God. We serve a holy God who can allow nothing that is unclean into His presence.

But there is a type of uncleanness related to sin. So, just to be clear, that’s not the type of uncleanness we’re talking about in this passage. We’re talking about ritual uncleanness.

And the truth is, the whole world is in a state of ritual uncleanness, and you can’t avoid it. We live in an unclean world, and being unclean is not unusual at all – it’s normal. Being ritually unclean is not a sin; it’s part of living in the world.

Does that mean it’s unimportant? Certainly not. You can be ritually unclean in this world, and it’s not a problem – until you want to go into the presence of the L-RD. There is no uncleanness with God – He is eternally pure. So, as we are, as we normally exist in the world, we also are unable to enter into the presence of God because we are unclean.

Yet is this state of ritual uncleanness all that different from other ways in which we are unlike The L-RD? God is eternal; we are mortal. Those who are mortal cannot look on the face of the L-RD and live, and yet in the world to come, we will know him in exactly that way. So can we truly enter into the presence of the L-RD as we are now, or must we undergo a fundamental change? We learn this from:

1 Corinthians 15:48-57
As was the earthly man, so are those who are of the earth; and as is the man from heaven, so also are those who are of heaven. And just as we have borne the likeness of the earthly man, so shall we bear the likeness of the man from heaven. I declare to you, brothers, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God, nor does the perishable inherit the imperishable. Listen, I tell you a mystery: We will not all sleep, but we will all be changed–in a flash, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, the dead will be raised imperishable, and we will be changed. For the perishable must clothe itself with the imperishable, and the mortal with immortality. When the perishable has been clothed with the imperishable, and the mortal with immortality, then the saying that is written will come true: “Death has been swallowed up in victory. Where, O death, is your victory? Where, O death, is your sting?” The sting of death is sin, and the power of sin is the law. But thanks be to God! He gives us the victory through our Lord Yeshua the Messiah.

Did you catch that? Flesh and blood is what we are now and flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God. In the same way, the unclean cannot inherit the clean; the mortal cannot inherit the immortal. But we will all be changed. The cleansings, the rituals, the sacrifices that we see in this week’s Torah portion are all to point us toward that promise, that future reality.

Now, we are like all flesh and blood: unclean and mortal. But in the world to come, that will not be the case. We will be made clean, we will cast off our mortality, so that we may dwell in the presence of the L-RD in a manner that will allow Him to dwell with us.

We do not achieve this on our own; we will be changed by the L-RD. This transformation is what the ceremonies detailed here in this week’s reading point to.

While this week’s portion may seem a bit dry, a bit boring, and about things that simply do not relate to our lives today, the truths that underlie these teachings are lasting and permanent. It tells us about the nature of our humanity, our need for our Messiah, and if we listen to Messiah and obey all that He commands us to do, it hints at our future, our eternity, where we will have the ability to enter into the eternal Tent of Meeting to dwell in the house of the L-RD forever.

Shabbat Shalom.

My Passover Day 3 Commentary

Tuesday, April 14th, 2009

Some folks write Web pages that go on endlessly about Blackberry plants in Asia or something obscure like that. But here at MessianicMusings.com, we’re all about the Torah and the Messiah Yeshua. Here’s my commentary for Passover Day 3. Or listen to it! Shalom.

Shabbat Shalom.

Our parashah for today is for the third day of Passover and covers Exodus 33:12 through Exodus 34:26 as well as Numbers 28:19-25. The main body of this text comes to us from the parashah known as Ki Tisa, which we studied only a few weeks ago. So while much of this week’s reading will be familiar to many of you, I’d like to focus on something I didn’t spend as much time on a few weeks ago, and that is the specific qualities named by The L-RD when He agrees to show Moses his glory.

Now, there is a context for this. You’ll remember that the people of Israel had just demanded that Aaron build them a calf of gold to worship because Moses was taking – they felt – too long on the mountain. Moses shared the L-RD’s anger at this betrayal, but also demonstrated his concern for the L-RD’s reputation by talking to Him and convincing the L-RD not to strike down the Israelites in anger, but to keep His promises to the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, so that the L-RD’s name would not be cursed by His enemies.

So, as this portion begins, Moses has convinced God to accompany His people into the land he promised and Moses has developed such trust and intimacy with the L-RD that he has asked to see the L-RD in his glory. We read this in:

Exodus 33:17-20
And the L-RD said to Moses, “I will do the very thing you have asked, because I am pleased with you and I know you by name.” Then Moses said, “Now show me your glory.” And the L-RD said, “I will cause all my goodness to pass in front of you, and I will proclaim my name, the L-RD, in your presence. I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion. But,” he said, “you cannot see my face, for no one may see me and live.”

Now, this can be a disconcerting passage, in context, for it was not long before this passage that we are told that the L-RD would meet with Moses in the Tent of Meeting, and that he would speak to Moses face-to-face.

Yet here, only a few verses later in Exodus, we read that the L-RD says that no one may see His face and live. So, is the Torah contradicting itself, as some may charge? Not at all. Let’s look at the other passage in context.

Exodus 33:10-11
Whenever the people saw the pillar of cloud standing at the entrance to the tent, they all stood and worshiped, each at the entrance to his tent. The L-RD would speak to Moses face to face, as a man speaks with his friend. Then Moses would return to the camp, but his young aide Joshua son of Nun did not leave the tent.

Notice the language in this passage. The L-RD would speak to Moses face-to-face … as a man speaks with his friend. Is this a description about the physical presence of the L-RD, or is this a description about the nature of His conversation with Moses? To help us understand this passage, let’s take a look at the Strong’s entry for the word “face.”

Strong’s 6440 paniym
1) face
1b) presence, person
1f) as adv of loc/temp
1f1) before and behind, toward, in front of, forward, formerly, from beforetime, before

As you can see here, the Hebrew word used is paniym, and it can mean face, presence, person, and as an adverb, it can indicate location and temperament. It is in this context that I believe the paniym is being used – to describe how the L-RD (subject) would speak (verb) to Moses (object). Therefore, in this sense, face-to-face is not being used to describe the L-RD’s location relative to Moses, but his temperament toward Moses.

This is supported by the phrase that follows it, “as a man speaks to his friend,” which is intended to further define what is meant by the adverbial phrase, “face-to-face.”

So, how does a man speak to his friend? Usually that would mean directly, without pretense, without one’s guard up, and without the normal formality that one adopts when talking with strangers.

So, that is how it is between the L-RD and Moses when finally He agrees to show Moses His glory. We read this in:

Exodus 34:5-8
Then the L-RD came down in the cloud and stood there with him and proclaimed his name, the L-RD. And he passed in front of Moses, proclaiming, “The L-RD, the L-RD, the compassionate and gracious God, slow to anger, abounding in love and faithfulness, maintaining love to thousands, and forgiving wickedness, rebellion and sin. Yet he does not leave the guilty unpunished; he punishes the children and their children for the sin of the fathers to the third and fourth generation.” Moses bowed to the ground at once and worshiped.

Now, when the L-RD is revealing Himself to Moses like this, He’s not literally saying, “The L-RD, the L-RD.” Instead, He is using his personal name, which we know to be revealed in the Hebrew letters, yod-hey-vav-hey. So the L-RD is being very revealing at this time with Moses and what I’d like to focus on for the remainder of our study today are the personal qualities the L-RD reveals about Himself in this passage.

The first quality the L-RD reveals about Himself is His compassionate nature. We know this to be true by the testimony of other passages in Scripture, as well as the L-RD’s actions as revealed through the Torah and the rest of the Tenakh. For example, we read this in:

Nehemiah 9:31
Even so, in your great compassion, you didn’t completely destroy them; nor did you abandon them, for you are a compassionate and merciful God.

Compassionate, gracious, merciful. All of these words are similar and used to describe various facets of the nature of God’s character. We find that the word used here for compassion is the Hebrew word racham.

Strong’s 7355 racham
1) to love, love deeply, have mercy, be compassionate, have tender affection, have compassion
1b1) to have compassion, be compassionate
1b1a) of God, man
1c) (Pual) to be shown compassion, be compassionate

So we can see that what the L-RD is saying is that he is a loving and patient God. Why would he say that?

Well, because ever since the fall in the Garden, man’s core instinct is not to trust the L-RD. And we don’t trust because we lack faith. So in showing Moses His glory, his true nature, we see here that part of that picture is compassion – racham – which speaks about a loving, merciful, tender and affectionate nature that the L-RD possesses.

Nearly everything that follows this self-description of the L-RD to Moses is an elaboration on this same concept. Take “slow to anger” as an example. Now, some would point to certain passages, such as the flood, and question the L-RD’s slowness to anger. What we often lose sight of, however, is that for One who is unable to allow anything unholy into His presence, the L-RD is incredibly patient.

Prior to the flood, the earth was around for nearly 2,000 from the time of Adam’s creation in the Garden. The L-RD could have justly wiped out the earth then and there, after the man and woman ate from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. He could have destroyed the earth after Cain took Abel’s life. Any number of stops along the way, the L-RD could have poured out His full wrath upon us all, and yet he did not. In fact, even when the flood waters rose around Noah’s ark, he had already promised a Messiah many times over. In the midst of the judgment and correction of the flood, he was showing his compassion and his slowness to anger.

I mean, the Torah only speaks of six thousand years of history, and the first two thousand years are known among the rabbis as the time of desolation. In all that time, only Enoch pleased God sufficiently in his obedience that the L-RD took him up to heaven without suffering death first. Think of two thousand years and millions (if not billions) of people living in all that time, and yet humanity still fell short of God’s perfect standard and often rebelled against whatever He did reveal, such as in the Garden. I’d call that patient, slow to anger and whatever else you can dream up.

We know that He is abounding in love and faithfulness and maintaining His love to many. But it’s the next part of the L-RD’s description of Himself to Moses that seems at odds.

On the one hand, the L-RD says He forgives wickedness, rebellion and sin. Yet in the same breath, He reveals that He “does not leave the guilty unpunished; he punishes the children and their children for the sin of the fathers to the third and fourth generation.” Right?

So how can God, on the one hand, forgive wickedness, rebellion and sin, yet still say He does not leave the guilty unpunished? After all, they are almost diametrically opposed concepts! Either a person is forgiven and not punished… or a person is punished in their guilt, but not forgiven. Right? That’s what the world would say.

Yet with the L-RD, there’s a solution to this seeming contradiction. You see, if we stand on our own before the L-RD, we do indeed fall short of his standard. However, we are not on our own before the L-RD, are we? No, we have the promised Messiah, Yeshua, interceding between us and the L-RD, acting as our advocate and redeemer, paying a price for that forgiveness that would have been beyond us on our own.

So there is the answer. If those who practice wickedness, rebellion and sin remain in their sorry state, then the L-RD’s justice will be visited on them, just as the L-RD promised. If, however, they do repent and turn to the Messiah Yeshua, God will indeed forgive them.

Does that mean the guilty go unpunished?

Not at all; if one truly trusts in the Messiah Yeshua, the punishment has indeed been dealt out; yet instead of falling on those who committed these things, the punishment falls on the head of our Messiah Yeshua.

So the L-RD could offer forgiveness to the guilty – and we’re all guilty – and yet honestly say that He punishes the guilty. Because anyone who is guilty and repents can be forgiven while, through the work of our Messiah Yeshua, their guilt is still punished.

There is much to learn about God from these character-revealing words, and as we look over all it teaches us about who God is, there is a single word that comes to mind each time I witness a new layer of meaning revealed. You’ll recognize it from our Passover Seder.

Dayienu! It would have been enough! So let’s recount the L-RD’s goodness now, and each time I share a quality, I’d like you to respond with, “It would have been enough!”

If the L-RD was gracious and compassionate, but was not slow to anger… It would have been enough!

If the L-RD was slow to anger, but was not abounding in love and faithfulness… It would have been enough!

If the L-RD was abounding in love and faithfulness, but was not maintaining love to many… It would have been enough!

If the L-RD was maintaining love to many, but was not forgiving wickedness, rebellion and sin … it would have been enough!

If the L-RD was forgiving wickedness, rebellion and sin, but was leaving the guilty unpunished … it would have been enough!

If the L-RD was NOT leaving the guilty unpunished, but had withheld from us the Messiah … it would have been enough.

Yet the L-RD has richly blessed us in all these many ways and yet has also offered us the promised Messiah, Yeshua, to take our punishment upon Himself. It is more than we have earned, more than we deserve, and praise be to the L-RD for all He offers us, both through His Torah and His Messiah.
Dayienu! IT IS ENOUGH AND MORE THAN ENOUGH!

Shabbat Shalom.

The difference between commentaries and sermons

Thursday, March 5th, 2009

I think I’m finally grasping the difference between sermons and commentaries. It’s been a fine line for me and one I haven’t always seen clearly as I continue my Messianic training. It’s a quandary even the best diet pills can’t help me with.

So, here’s my understanding as of now: in a Torah commentary, the purpose is to teach, not to exhort. In a sermon, exhortation is just fine. Check.

Now here’s my newest insight: in a Torah commentary, you are to stick closely to the content of the parashah, not use it as a launching point for tangentially-related topics. Check.

OK, so, a good commentary on Tetsaveh, for example, would talk about the priestly garments described in the instructions of the L-RD to Moses. A less-focused commentary that strays into sermonizing would be one that picks up on the presence of a hint of Messiah in the instructions for the Tent of Meeting, and then launching into the theme of obedience to God.

Guess which way my upcoming Tetsaveh commentary went? Not the better of the two ways, I’m afraid, but in the process I did learn a lot more about how to distinguish a commentary from a sermon; so it was a great growing experience! Mazel tov!

Preparing for my next commentary

Monday, September 22nd, 2008

Already, I am preparing a rough draft in my head of my next Torah commentary. It will be on the parashah of Vayelekh, covering only Chapter 31 of Deuteronomy. In this parashah, Moshe is being told to prepare for his own death by Adonai; having recently lost my mother to cancer, this may end up being a very personal commentary.

It’s not like Moshe is sitting around giving out his secret recipes for sweet potato casserole, either; he’s being told by the L-RD that despite of 120 years of faithful service to Adonai and standing in the gap between Adonai and the Jewish people, they will still break covenant with Adonai one Moshe is gone.

What a burden to be given just prior to death! Like a parent being told, “After all your prayers and worry over your son or daughter, they are still going to go mess up their lives.” Certainly, there is the messianic hope to sustain Moshe at the hour of his death, but there is little else.

Shof’tim commentary, part six

Monday, September 8th, 2008

When my mother came up sick and we knew her time was short, my wife and I were glad we’d set some emergency funds aside in our savings accounts.

Here’s the rest of my Shof’tim commentary. Or listen to it!

When you think about it, why would the L-RD need to declare something as simple and obvious as, “You are not to distort justice or show favoritism, and you are not to accept a bribe?”

Easy! Because it is not in our nature to be selfless and pursue justice at ADONAI’s perfect standard, or even at the Torah’s minimum standard. As any parent knows, you teach your children what they do not already know, not what they already know. You teach what they are supposed to do, not what they are already doing.

So the answer to my question of how we got stuck dealing with all this mess of determining truth and justice may have begun in Genesis, but it is also explained in this week’s parashah.

Deuteronomy 18:15-19
“ADONAI will raise up for you a prophet like me from among yourselves, from your own kinsmen. You are to pay attention to him, just as when you were assembled at Horev and requested ADONAI your God, ‘Don’t let me hear the voice of ADONAI my God any more, or let me see this great fire ever again; if I do, I will die!’ On that occasion ADONAI said to me, ‘They are right in what they are saying. I will raise up for them a prophet like you from among their kinsmen. I will put my words in his mouth, and he will tell them everything I order him. Whoever doesn’t listen to my words, which he will speak in my name, will have to account for himself to me.”

This passage is one of the key messianic promises ADONAI makes to us, and he makes it precisely because he knows that no matter how many regulations he lays down for priests and judges and kings, none of them can ever live up to it completely, not to a standard that meets not just the compromise of Torah, but the perfect standard of ADONAI.

That could be accomplished only by the promised messiah, Yeshua. He is the one who me must, at last, allow to rule us, as only He is able to do so perfectly and free from selfish interests. We pushed God out of His role as justice-giver in the Garden, and rejected the restoration of ADONAI to that role by asking at Horeb not to hear His voice directly. Therefore, we must struggle to achieve justice and mercy, and to keep our land and our lives and our households and our families free from wickedness, free from injustice, free from the shedding of innocent blood. Yet ultimately we are not the solution to the problem, because ultimately we all fail. There is one solution, and it is found in the person of Yeshua the Messiah.

Shof’tim commentary part 5

Monday, September 8th, 2008

While some people believe Ephedrasil Hardcore is one of the most effective fat-burners, I know the most effective burner of spiritual fat is time spent in prayer.

Here’s more of my Shof’tim commentary. Or listen to it!

I once had a social studies teacher who was of the opinion that the most perfect and efficient form of government was what he called a “benevolent dictatorship.” The “one person decides it all” aspect of the dictatorship, in his mind, delivered efficiency because there would be no time spent on debate; and the benevolence aspect would, in his mind, guarantee that no one was treated poorly or unjustly.

The flaw in his theory, however, is the assumption that any of us could be benevolent and unselfish enough to handle the responsibilities of such a dictatorship. History is full of examples of dictators and, ultimately, none of them proved to be benevolent, certainly not benevolent enough to meet ADONAI’s perfect standard of justice.

Matthew 12:34-35
You snakes! How can you who are evil say anything good? For the mouth speaks what overflows from the heart. The good person brings forth good things from his store of good, and the evil person brings forth evil things from his store of evil.

We must remember, too, that Yeshua’s definition of what is good and evil is not like the world’s definition of those words. This is why a king is required by ADONAI in this week’s reading to write and constantly study a scroll of the Torah, for the only path to “good,” is through the study of ADONAI and His word. Any other path leads to selfishness, not ADONAI’s brand of justice. Indeed, the Psalmist confirms that the opposite of obedience to God is selfishness.

Psalms 119:36
Bend my heart toward your instructions and not toward selfish gain.

So, I think it’s now clear that there is only one who is unselfish enough that He could be a truly benevolent dictator, and that is Yeshua the Messiah; and it is not in His nature to play the role of a dictator, since in this life we are created with the ability to either follow in obedience or rebel against his perfect will. A dictator allows no rebellion.

Shof’tim Commentary, part 4

Monday, September 8th, 2008

While I look at my waist and sometimes wonder if fat burners might help, one thing I know I need to eliminate is the spiritual flubber surrounding my life. Nothing’s better for that than prayer and digging into the Word of the L-RD.

Here’s more from my Shof’tim commentary. Or listen to it!

While I could go into detail on any of these teachings, as I studied and prayed through this passage, my overwhelming question to ADONAI was, “L-RD, how did we get into this mess? Why must we be so involved in the messiness of setting such high standards for leaders of various types and such harsh punishments for various crimes? Why must we deal with so much death and bloodshed?”

As I studied and prayed, however, I was reminded of where it all began. In fact, it goes all the way back to the Garden.

Genesis 3:4-5
The serpent said to the woman, “It is not true that you will surely die; because God knows that on the day you eat from it, your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”

This was the line that the serpent used to tempt Adam and Havah; the desire to know good and evil. Unfortunately, like all the lies of the Adversary, we did not receive what we thought we were getting. It is true that we became aware of knowing the difference between good and evil, but by doing so, we were actually replacing a role in creation that ADONAI had reserved for Himself.

We were not meant to decide right and wrong, and the testimony to the truth of that is all around us in the world. Because, unlike what the world would have us believe, we are not born as inherently good. We are born inherently selfish and self-serving, because since the fall, we are born not in the glorified and sin-free bodies Adam and Havah possessed at first in the Garden, but in finite, temporary bodies marred by sin and selfishness.

Shof’tim commentary, part 3

Monday, September 8th, 2008

One of the nice things about doing a Torah commentary is that you don’t have to be an expert in weight-loss or the benefits of Fenphedra; all you need to know about is the Bible. Which is a huge task in and of itself.

Here’s more from my Shof’tim commentary. Or listen to it!

The closing verses of chapter 17 contain instructions for how Isra’el is to appoint a king, if they decide they desire to have a king rule over them as their neighboring nations do, and basic principals for how that king is to conduct himself in office. The most important requirement is found at the end of the chapter.

Deuteronomy 17:18-20
“When he has come to occupy the throne of his kingdom, he is to write a copy of this Torah for himself in a scroll, from the one the cohanim and L’vi’im use. It is to remain with him, and he is to read in it every day, as long as he lives; so that he will learn to fear ADONAI his God and keep all the words of this Torah and these laws and obey them; so that he will not think he is better than his kinsmen; and so that he will not turn aside either to the right or to the left from ADONAI’s mitzvah.

Chapter 18 concerns regulations for the priests and how they are to live. It also contains a very important passage that we’ll come back to shortly.

Chapter 19 covers how to deal with accidental deaths as opposed to murders, and the setting up of sanctuary cities, which we recently heard a very good commentary about. It also covers how to deal with witnesses who lie in their testimony to the judges of Isra’el. This is the passage that recommends such a liar should be punished in the same manner as the crime the accused was charged with, had he been found guilty. It is the passage Yeshua is referring to when He says, in Matthew 5:38-39:

Matthew 5:38-39
“You have heard that our fathers were told, ‘Eye for eye and tooth for tooth.’ But I tell you not to stand up against someone who does you wrong. On the contrary, if someone hits you on the right cheek, let him hit you on the left cheek too!

Chapter 20 instructs the people on how to conduct war against their neighbors, by always offering first terms of peace, in order to prevent the unnecessary shedding of innocent blood. And the first part of chapter 21 concludes Shof’tim with instructions on how to deal justice out in the case of a murder victim where there are no witnesses and the case is likely to remain unsolved.

More from my Shof’tim commentary

Monday, September 8th, 2008

While some people identify their profession through company logo shirts, for sometime who is pursuing ordination, it is the Word of God that is our identifier. Here is another passage from my commentary on Shof’tim. Or listen to it!

And what is justice in the eyes of ADONAI? First and foremost, it is a pursuit of discerning the truth, and then acting on it. There are several safeguards for discerning truth set up throughout the rest of the parashah.

For example, when speaking of crimes punishable by death, such as worshipping false Gods in the land of Isra’el, we read in Deuteronomy 17:6:

Deuteronomy 17:6
The death sentence is to be carried out only if there was testimony from two or three witnesses; he may not be sentenced to death on the testimony of only one witness.

The judges themselves are another safeguard established here, as are the Levitical priests. On controversial matters, we are told, the people are to bring their cases before an assembly of the priests and a judge, and they will render a verdict:

Deuteronomy 17:9b-11
Seek their opinion, and they will render a verdict for you. You will then act according to what they have told you there in that place which ADONAI will choose; you are to take care to act according to all their instructions. In accordance with the Torah they teach you, you are to carry out the judgment they render, not turning aside to the right or the left from the verdict they declare to you.

This pattern of establishing a system of human authority based on the Torah and ADONAI’s teaching is repeated throughout this week’s reading.