Image 01

MessianicMusings.com

Not quite Jewish, not quite Christian … totally commited to Torah and Messiah Yeshua.

Posts Tagged ‘Rabbi Akiba’

Even higher than a prophet?

Tuesday, March 27th, 2007

As Dan Gruber reveals in Rabbi Akiba’s Messiah, religion and politics were pretty much the same thing from about the time of the Maccabees to the fall of Jerusalem, the period of time in which the Pharisiacal rabbinic movement rose to power and strengthened its hold on all of Jewish life and culture. The interesting thing is that although this may have been true of Jewish society even earlier, never before did those in power elevate themselves to a position of power over even the G-d of Israel. The rabbis did.

Certainly, King David’s rule could have gone a lot smoother had he elevated himself to a positon of authority over G-d, as did Rabbi Akiba. Why, there would have been no penalty for stealing another man’s wife. And he could have built the temple himself, rather than waiting for his son, Solomon, to do it. David was called to account by G-d through an indepedent and outcast prophet. That possibility still existed in Israel prior to Rabbi Akiba.

Akiba, perhaps fearing a prophetic challenge to his power similar to what David faced, implemented a rather ingenious idea; simply by declaring it so, the Akiba movement declared that only rabbis could prophesy legitimately and that all other prophets were illegitimate. They justified their claim by twisting the meaning of scripture to fit their exegetical agenda, as was Akiba’s habit, and that was that.

It was like saying that to be a prophet, you have to have business cards that prove it, only in an even more concrete and exclusive way. Of course, only those rabbis who supported Akiba were granted this rather exclusive prophetic status. Goodbye, prophets. Goodbye Adonai. Hello, absolute rabbinic authority.

The reliability of the rabbis?

Sunday, March 25th, 2007

Prior to Rabbi Akiba, Pharisaic Judaism, which ultimately became modern Judaism, kept its scope and authority somewhat limited. While his predecessor, Rabbi Eliezer, preferred to keep the scope of Oral Law limited to its until-then traditional scope, Rabbi Akiba had a more ambitious agenda.

Under Rabbi Eliezer, Pharisaic Judaism was like a set of Powell furniture; solid, sturdy and based on reliable ingredients. In other words, the scope of the Oral Law was confined to matters of keeping the social order.

Not so under Rabbi Akiba. Under his guidance and direction, nearly all matters of life, be they public, personal or intimate, came under the control and ruling authority of the rabbis. This move had more to do with political than religious control, though in the first century the two concepts were nearly inseparable. As such, rabbinical authority extended not only to dietary matters and property rights, but even when so far as to dictate the nature and frequency of the intimate relations between a husband and wife.

The problem with Rabbi Akiba’s direction for Judaism is not that he was a politician trying to establish the authority of his sect, but that in doing so, he overtly overthrew the authority of the Torah in favor of the rulings of the Rabbis. Under Akiba’s version of Judaism, even G-d himself could not challenge rabbinical authority, but must submit to it.

Of course, with the Gentile-ization of the Talmudei Yeshua into the state-church of Rome, in the form of Catholicism, Christianity ultimately went in error toward the same direction. All of this leads one to wonder where first-century messianic Judaism went shortly after the first century, and how it could ever be recovered in purity, nearly 1900 years later.

Food for contemplation. Books like Rabbi Akiba’s Messiah, as well as The Church and the Jews, both by Daniel Gruber, get my highest recommendation.

History can kill one’s appetite for religion

Monday, March 19th, 2007

Soon — this week, actually — I have to turn in my first paper for messianic ordination training. The theme of the paper is, “What practical use does rabbinics hold for today’s believer?” With most of the reading out of the way, I’m finally zeroing in on a thesis statement.

It comes to this, and since I’ve already begun study in the second course of study, focusing on the [Christian] church and the Jews, I can say it safely applies to both Jews and Christians alike: Reading about church history is no way to inspire yourself toward obedience to haShem, primarily because so many failed to live up to that commitment … even the most pious figures one can imagine.

Rabbi Akiba? He comes off as a rather brutal, intolerant man. Constantine? A murderer of those faithful to the messianic faith he co-opted into a state religion and hardly the sort one could imagine as being remotely holy, let alone a pope. Martin Luther? Violently antisemitic.

To be honest, a bit of church history can kill one’s appetite for religion about as effective as a solid dose of Phentermine can kill one’s desire for a thick, juicy steak. Of course, it only goes to prove what the Brit haDashah teaches through Messiah Y’shua: “He who says he is without sin deceives himself and the truth is not in him.”

Certainly the history of both Christianity and Judaism is rife with examples of this particular truth.