Image 01

MessianicMusings.com

Not quite Jewish, not quite Christian … totally commited to Torah and Messiah Yeshua.

Posts Tagged ‘sermon’

The road ahead

Tuesday, August 17th, 2010

Well, it looks like I have some writing to do!

I have two Torah commentaries coming up; one this weekend on Ki Tetse, and one two weeks after that on the double-portion of Nitsavim and VaYelech. That will be nice.

However, I’ve been invited by Rabbi Stan to do one of the two fill-in sermons at Sar Shalom while he is on his Israel trip. That’s quite an honor, and tells me I must have done OK filling in for him back in July. That will come up in mid-October, so there’s plenty of time on that one.

Of course, I have a children’s curriculum I need to finish writing, and then I have six or seven eBooks I’m working on, based on past Torah commentaries and sermons I’ve written, but deeply expanded from what one can find for free here on my blog.

This is in addition to the fact that I’m working on a novel as well. So yeah; I have a LOT of writing to do.

Starting work on repentance sermon

Monday, June 28th, 2010

I’m starting my work on my big upcoming sermon on repentance.

Filling the time up has never been a problem for me; keeping the scope focused enough to stay within the time limit is more frequently a challenge, as I’m a bit wordy… something I’m sure anyone who has read my teachings has noticed.

Another challenge for me is procrastination; as much as I love research and teaching and writing, when the time comes to start writing, just about everything seems more appealing than sitting down and typing it out.

Either way, though, I almost always get the message written and handed in on time. Hopefully this time will be no exception. My desktop PC is finally back up and running; OnlineBible.net software is installed and loaded with all the tools I need.

All I really need to do now is pray and write and pray and write until it’s done.

Sermon: The Parable of the Weeds

Sunday, January 10th, 2010

I was asked to prepare an “emergency reserve sermon” last weekend and ended up having to deliver it this weekend. Here’s my sermon on The Parable of the Weeds. Or listen to it!

Shabbat Shalom.

We’ve been looking at a couple of the parables of Yeshua in recent weeks, and whenever one spends time on His parables, some natural questions arise. One of the first questions that comes up is, what is a parable exactly? Well, we get this definition from:

JEWISHENCYCLOPEDIA.COM
A short religious allegory. The Old Testament contains only five parables. A large number of parables are found in post-Biblical literature, in Talmud and Midrash. The Talmudic writers believed in the pedagogic importance of the parable, and regarded it as a valuable means of determining the true sense of the Law and of attaining a correct understanding thereof.

Now, that’s interesting, but I think it’s important to point out that parables are not relating literal, specific events. For example, with the Parable of the Talents, there was probably not a specific ruler and three servants that those events happened to. You see, a parable is a teaching tool; it’s a story invented by the teacher to illustrate a lesson. It’s a way of taking an abstract concept and making it relatable to the listener. They take something that’s hard to understand, and relate it to something nearly everyone can understand.

This defines nearly all of Yeshua’s parables, the bulk of which teach about the Kingdom of Heaven. Since none of us in this life have witnessed the Kingdom of Heaven personally, Yeshua’s parables try to help us understand what that unknown experience will be like by teaching us about it through situations most of us can understand and relate to. And it was even prophesied that Yeshua would teach by the use of parables, as we read in:

PSALM 78:1-2
O my people, hear my teaching; listen to the words of my mouth. I will open my mouth in parables, I will utter hidden things, things from of old.

And Yeshua was not the first to use parables as a teaching tool; He spoke through the prophets in parables as well, as we find in:

EZEKIEL 17:1-3A
The word of the L-RD came to me: “Son of man, set forth an allegory and tell the house of Israel a parable. Say to them, ‘This is what the Sovereign L-RD says:

Now, last time I spoke, we looked at the Parable of Great Debt, and saw that it was a teaching on forgiveness. We also learned that Yeshua regarded forgiveness not as a good idea, not as a suggestion or an option, but as an expectation, a command. In fact, Yeshua taught–and it was underlined in the Parable of Great Debt–that the forgiveness we receive from the L-RD will be in direct proportion to the forgiveness we extend to others.

Of course, the hardest part of Yeshua’s teaching to wrestle with was how we might be able to extend such forgiveness to those who don’t merely offend us by their rude behavior, but who are responsible for violent acts and crimes, who take the life or health of a loved one, who by violence rob others of their peace of mind.

I mean, it’s one thing to forgive the person who rear-ended your car during rush hour. That’s somewhat easy. It’s another thing to forgive the sexual predator who victimized one of your children, to forgive the rapist or the murderer.

These are serious issues. And what they bring to light is the problem presented by the presence of evil in the world. This question of why evil exists has been asked for almost as long as people have sought to know God. Rabbi Harold Kushner made a name for himself with his book, Why Bad Things Happen to Good People. Locally, Pastor Greg Boyd wrestled with this question in his book, God At War: Satan And the Problem of Evil.

And really, no matter where you look, whenever anything terrible and tragic takes place, from the Holocaust to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the question that eventually comes to the lips of most people – whether they are believers or not – is, “How can God allow such a thing? How can a creation God declared ‘very good’ contain the possibility for such tremendous acts of evil?”

Now, one could spend a lot of time rationalizing these questions away without ever addressing them seriously, but that’s not why we’re here, is it? Rather than try to figure it out for ourselves, let’s go to the One who has real answers. Yeshua has a parable that explains why there is evil in the world, so let’s establish a common frame of reference for our discussion. Let’s take a look at the parable of the weeds in:

MATTHEW 13:24-30
Yeshua put before them another parable. “The Kingdom of Heaven is like a man who sowed good seed in his field; but while people were sleeping, his enemy came and sowed weeds among the wheat, then went away. When the wheat sprouted and formed heads of grain, the weeds also appeared. The owner’s servants came to him and said, ‘Sir, didn’t you sow good seed in your field? Where have the weeds come from?’ He answered, ‘An enemy has done this.’ The servants asked him, ‘Then do you want us to go and pull them up?’ But he said, ‘No, because if you pull up the weeds, you might uproot some of the wheat at the same time. Let them both grow together until the harvest; and at harvest-time, I will tell the reapers to collect the weeds first and tie them in bundles to be burned, but to gather the wheat into my barn.’”

Now, at first, this appears to be a little abstract from our main question about the existence of evil. Yet it explains a lot of our questions when properly understood. Fortunately, this is one of the parables Yeshua Himself explained directly to His disciples and for our benefit, so let’s read on in:

MATTHEW 13:36-43
Then he left the crowds and went into the house. His disciples approached him and said, “Explain to us the parable of the weeds in the field.” He answered, “The one who sows the good seed is the Son of Man; the field is the world. As for the good seed, these are the people who belong to the Kingdom; and the weeds are the people who belong to the Evil One. The enemy who sows them is the Adversary, the harvest is the end of the age, and the harvesters are angels. Just as the weeds are collected and burned up at the harvest, so will it be at the end of the age. The Son of Man will send forth his angels, and they will collect out of his Kingdom all the things that cause people to sin and all the people who are far from Torah; and they will throw them into the fiery furnace, where people will wail and grind their teeth. Then the righteous will shine forth like the sun in the Kingdom of their Father. Whoever has ears, let him hear!

Now, Yeshua offers up these explanations rapidly, but let’s slow down and apply them to the question of the existence of evil. First and foremost, what this parable reveals is that we are mistaken when we attribute works of evil in the world to God. As John, Yeshua’s apostle, writes, “God is light; in Him there is no darkness at all,” and Yeshua underlines this point in the master’s response to his servants’ question about the appearance of weeds. “This is the work of an enemy,” he says.

In a direct allusion to the Garden of Eden and the creation story, Yeshua says that the master in this tale sowed good seed. God’s intent in creating this world was to be in fellowship with us; it was the work of the Adversary, not the L-RD, that brought evil into existence. And this understanding is consistent with the rest of the Torah, the prophets and the writings, as well as the New Covenant writings. As we read in:

II SAMUEL 22:29
You are my lamp, O L-RD; the L-RD turns my darkness into light.

So the L-RD is the source of all light, and he transformed darkness into light. He is the source, therefore, of truth in the middle of deception. We also read this in:

ISAIAH 5:18-20
Woe to those who draw sin along with cords of deceit, and wickedness as with cart ropes, to those who say, “Let God hurry, let him hasten his work so we may see it. Let it approach, let the plan of the Holy One of Israel come, so we may know it.” Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.

This theme of darkness being the work of the enemy is carried over into the prophets, but is this the classic excuse? Is this simply a reason to say, “the devil made me do it,” whenever we mess up, backslide or strike out in anger? Not at all. The enemy may be the source of evil in the world, but do we bear responsibility for cooperating with it? We read this in:

EPHESIANS 5:8-10
For you were once darkness, but now you are light in the L-RD. Live as children of light (for the fruit of the light consists in all goodness, righteousness and truth) and find out what pleases the L-RD.

Did you catch that? We weren’t just in the darkness before knowing the L-RD… we were darkness. It wasn’t just in us, it was our nature, our substance. Only through the work of Yeshua are we now changed; we are no longer darkness, but light! This idea is further supported by Yeshua’s own words; when confronted by men seeking to do evil to him in:

JOHN 8:42-45
Yeshua said to them, “If God were your Father, you would love me, for I came from God and now am here. I have not come on my own; but he sent me. Why is my language not clear to you? Because you are unable to hear what I say. You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desire. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies. Yet because I tell the truth, you do not believe me!

In this passage, as in the parable of the weeds, Yeshua makes it clear that we either belong to the Kingdom of the L-RD, or we belong to the Adversary. When we choose to follow Messiah Yeshua and obey His Torah, we become light, we become wheat, we become children of His Kingdom. But does that mean all around us change with us?

No. As Yeshua describes in the Parable of the Weeds, we exist in the world alongside the children of the Adversary, even though we are children of the L-RD. So why does the L-RD allow evil to continue? Why doesn’t he just expunge it from existence, not allow it to continue to grow and to do further damage?

Well, he tried that approach once, didn’t he? That’s what the flood of Noah was all about! There was absolutely no one left in the world who was following the L-RD, except for Noah; so God vowed to destroy all flesh and start from scratch.

How well did that work? Did it put an end to evil, to sin, so that Messiah never had to appear? No, it didn’t, did it? And in later episodes with Moses, God expresses a desire to wipe out the sinful, to destroy all flesh and start fresh, and only the prayers of Moses, seeking to protect God’s name among the heathen, causes the L-RD to reconsider.

The problem of evil in the world is more complex than any weed-pulling can solve. Evil feeds not only itself, but it feeds off of each of us through sin. We’re entangled with it.

That’s why the master, in the parable of the weeds, tells his servants not to pull out the weeds. He tells them, ‘No, because if you pull up the weeds, you might uproot some of the wheat at the same time. Let them both grow together until the harvest.”

This is why there’s no bolt of lightning to strike us down immediately when we sin. The L-RD doesn’t work like that. If he did, all flesh would perish. We’d all be uprooted. In this life, we’re too intertwined with evil for God to purge it effectively; that which is good would be uprooted as well.

So, what does this all mean? How does it apply to last week’s forgiveness parable?

Well, nothing in the Bible exists on its own, does it? We cannot just select one verse, or one passage, and expect to understand it completely. We need context. And you know, just about every question I’ve been asked about this verse or that passage of the Bible over the past year or so, since I’ve been teaching regularly, has been answered not through human reasoning or finding a book by a learned rabbi or pastor, but by seeking out the meaning of the verse or passage in context to the verses around it.

So yes, last week, Yeshua did indeed teach that the servant who would not forgive his fellow servant’s debt was thrown in jail to be tortured until his debt was paid – which it never would be – and then went on to say, “This is how my heavenly Father will treat you, unless you forgive your brother from your heart.”

Forgiveness is not a light topic. Yet neither are those violent acts which wound us so deeply that forgiveness seems impossible. So how do we bring these ideas into alignment? How do we forgive the unforgivable? How do we maintain both forgiveness and personal safety at the same time?

Unfortunately, we often do not properly understand the context of what Yeshua said. As a result of missing the context, we misunderstand and misinterpret his meaning.

Let’s use an example to illustrate what we really mean. Let us imagine a scenario where a man and a woman have decided to divorce, because the wife feels the husband is a direct physical threat, either to her, her children, or both.

Misunderstanding Yeshua’s context, what we often hear taught on divorce comes from:

MATTHEW 5:31-32
“It has been said, ‘Anyone who divorces his wife must give her a certificate of divorce.’ But I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for marital unfaithfulness, causes her to become an adulteress, and anyone who marries the divorced woman commits adultery.

Well, that seems pretty cut and dried, doesn’t it? Yeshua explains elsewhere that Moses allowed for divorce in the Torah because our hearts were hard, but that it was not his perfect will for us to divorce, once we are married. Here he teaches that the only exception is marital infidelity.

As a result of sticking to the letter of the gospel account, rather than exploring the context, teachers and pastors for centuries have consoled women to stay in abusive marriages because their husband had not cheated on them, even though they’d beaten them, hospitalized them or worse. This technical, one-excuse-for-divorce argument has caused some abused spouses to seek out infidelity, just to have an excuse their church will recognize to divorce an abusive spouse. And it has cost many other abused spouses their lives because they stayed in out-of-control abusive relationships until their spouses finally did kill them.

None of that is necessary. Rabbi Stan often teaches that any rabbi worth his salt will tell you that the preservation of life comes before all the rules of the Torah, with one exception, and that is the command against worshiping other gods.

I mean, it just makes sense, doesn’t it? Generally, I eat kosher. But if someone puts a gun to my head and says, “Eat this ham steak or I’m pulling the trigger,” then like it or not, I’ll eat the ham steak. Life is precious to God, and so this is an understanding Yeshua would have had as well.

So where does this idea come from, that preserving life comes before all the commands, except the command against worshiping false Gods? There are many sources, but here’s an example of one from:

RABBI PINSKER, ACHAREI MOT, WEEKLY D’VAR TORAH
In the Talmud, the ancient rabbis debate how we know that pikuach nefesh—the preservation of life—is a mitzvah and that it takes precedence over all the other Torah commandments … In order to preserve a life, we may, for example, violate Shabbat observance or the laws of kashrut. In the volume of the Talmud called Yoma (85b) the Rabbis attribute this principle to our two little words vechai bahem— “’You shall live by them—and not die by them.” In other words, the Torah is given not to cause the loss of life, rather it is given that we may live, and therefore by logic we cannot be expected to endanger human life through the keeping of the Torah.

So, we don’t obey the Torah to such ridiculous extremes that we risk our own lives is the idea here. If the choice is eating pork or getting shot… eat the pork. It’s a no-brainer, right? That sounds good, but is there evidence that Yeshua had this same understanding as well? There is! We read this in:

LUKE 6:9
Then Yeshua said to them, “I ask you now, what is permitted on the Sabbath? Doing good or doing evil? Saving life or destroying it?”

In Luke’s account of Yeshua healing on the Sabbath, Yeshua by implication here refers to the idea that preserving life is one of the highest commands in the Torah, and that which is done to preserve life takes precedence over lesser commands. This is not an example of Yeshua doing away with the Torah, but merely acknowledging the importance of maintaining life over the importance of maintaining Sabbath observance.

So does that mean we should toss out all of the Torah under the heading of maintaining life? Of course not! Usually, obeying the rules of the Torah do not put our life on the line! But in defending Himself against alleged violation of the Oral Torah standard of Shabbat observance (though not the written Torah standards) Yeshua does say that the L-RD desires mercy, not sacrifice. Where does this come from? It comes from:

HOSEA 6:6
For I desire mercy, not sacrifice, and acknowledgment of God rather than burnt offerings.

What is the L-RD really saying here? Well, according to:

STRONG’S G1656 eleos
1) mercy: kindness or good will toward the miserable and the afflicted, joined with a desire to help them

So eleos is kindness shown by helping the miserable and afflicted, as opposed to what? According to:

STRONG’S G2378 thusia
• 1) a sacrifice, victim

So, ultimately what the L-RD is saying is, in our Torah observance, he wants us to be moved toward mercy, kindness toward those in misery. He desires that, not a human sacrifice, not the taking of a life in extreme observance of the Torah.

What does this mean?

Well, I think it means that while Yeshua was completely serious about not desiring that any who are married should be divorced, at the same time, it is apparent that the preservation of life comes before maintaining a marriage that is already shattered by acts of violence, by actions that in and of themselves shatter the vows of fidelity, love and respect of one’s spouse, even if no sexual infidelity has yet taken place.

If the choice is “break the vows of marriage by filing for divorce, or die at the hands of your violent and unrepentant spouse,” that should be as much of a no-brainer as “eat pork or die.” Life is precious to God, and maintaining the lives he has given us is more important than observing lesser commands.

So, if one finds themselves in a relationship that threatens their life and safety, please know that we serve a God who understands that. Know that we serve a God who knows when a marriage is broken, even before those who are in it know it’s broken. Know that while Yeshua desires you to stay married when you marry, he also does not ask you to give up your life as a literal victim to a spouse’s violence.

Yes, Yeshua said, “except for marital infidelity,” but part of his context for that statement, part of what he knew most people of his era understood, is that the preservation of your life would also take priority over staying married when a marriage is already shattered and has become life-threatening. And that includes the preservation of the life and safety of your children as well. For we serve Yeshua, who cares for the well-being of children so much, He said, in:

MATTHEW 18:6
“But if anyone causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a large millstone hung around his neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea.”

So, in the same way, let’s tie this back to last week’s lesson about forgiveness. Yes, Yeshua absolutely teaches us that unless we forgive those who have offended and wounded us, we will not be forgiven, and in the same way we forgive others, we also will be forgiven.

That’s true. It’s absolutely true. And it’s as absolutely true now as it was when I taught it last week. Yet what is the requirement for forgiveness? Repentance! Even the rabbis understood that! For, as we read in:

BABYLONIAN TALMUD, MISHNAH, YOMA 85B:
If one says: I shall sin and repent, sin and repent, no opportunity will be given to him to repent. [If one says]: I shall sin and the Day of Atonement will procure atonement for me, the Day of Atonement procures for him no atonement.

So genuine repentance is required for forgiveness. Not just an “I’m sorry I got caught” sort of repentance but the sort of repentance that says, “I recognize how wrong my actions were, and I have no intention to repeat them, for I now see them as they are and they horrify me.” A repentance that requires a complete turning away from any sort of entertaining of the temptation to slip back into the same sin again.

So are we to forgive others, no matter how often they repeat the offense? Yes.

But are we to forgive the unrepentant? Are we to forgive those who are plotting how to injure us again, even as they sit in front of us apologizing? We are to forgive them, yes. But how should our forgiveness of the unrepentant look?

Are we to sit down to an unsupervised dinner with the person who murdered a loved one, even if the murderer has shown no remorse? No.

Are we to offer to let a known child molester babysit our children? Of course not!

We are commanded to forgive, but it is not to be a brainless forgiveness, is it? God desires mercy, but he does not desire a human sacrifice to prove it!

If a person genuinely repents, we are to forgive, and show that forgiveness in the same way we want to be treated. There is no room for compromise on that front.

But if we are faced with someone who has not repented, we should forgive so that we do not allow bitterness and resentment to take root in our lives; but we should also remain cautious around the unrepentant, lest they find another opportunity to do evil to us. We should keep our eyes open. Because the natural question is, how can we know when someone who repents is genuine or not?

Pray for discernment. And give it time. Those who have not repented genuinely will reveal themselves before long; be cautious with them. But if repentance is genuine, we must forgive others as we have been forgiven.

It’s still a confusing topic, I know. But why is it confusing? It’s confusing because we all know people in our lives who can go through all the right steps, adopt all the right tones of voice and body language, who can sit face-to-face with you and seem to genuinely repent, and yet still be deceptive, still harbor evil intentions rather than the fruits of the Spirit.

Why is that? The reason for this is all explained in the Parable of the Weeds; we who believe and obey the L-RD are all wheat – children of the Kingdom of God – but we’re mixed in with weeds – children of the Adversary. And the children of the Adversary, as Yeshua pointed out, are like their father; they seek to deceive and destroy. Prayerful discernment is needed.

May Yeshua guide us all in dealing with those who are in our lives, giving us wisdom on who to forgive fully, because their repentance is genuine – and who to forgive at a distance, because their repentance is not genuine, but a trick, an attempt to gain naïve trust from us, so thatthey can do us further damage.

Help us, L-RD, to discern the wheat from the weeds. And help us, when dealing with the children of the Adversary, to still forgive those who wrong us; or at least to forgive them enough so that we do not allow ourselves to grow bitter and untrusting toward those who are also children of Your kingdom, who have done us no wrong.

Shabbat Shalom.

Sermon: The Parable of the Talents

Monday, December 21st, 2009

Here’s my sermon on the Parable of the Talents. Or listen to it!

Shabbat Shalom.

You know, usually when I’m asked to give a message, it’s a Torah commentary and my subject matter is determined by the weekly Torah reading. Today I was given more freedom to choose, and I finally settled on a parable of Yeshua that has always had some elements that puzzled me. So I leaped at the opportunity to study it more closely.

This parable is usually referred to as the “parable of the talents,” and I’ve heard teachers teach this parable many different ways. But before we get into analyzing it, let’s read through this parable now so that we all have a common frame of reference. Yeshua is speaking as we read this in:

Matthew 25:14-30
“Again, it will be like a man going on a journey, who called his servants and entrusted his property to them. To one he gave five talents of money, to another two talents, and to another one talent, each according to his ability. Then he went on his journey. The man who had received the five talents went at once and put his money to work and gained five more. So also, the one with the two talents gained two more. But the man who had received the one talent went off, dug a hole in the ground and hid his master’s money. After a long time the master of those servants returned and settled accounts with them. The man who had received the five talents brought the other five. ‘Master,’ he said, ‘you entrusted me with five talents. See, I have gained five more.’ His master replied, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant! You have been faithful with a few things; I will put you in charge of many things. Come and share your master’s happiness!’ The man with the two talents also came. ‘Master,’ he said, ‘you entrusted me with two talents; see, I have gained two more.’ His master replied, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant! You have been faithful with a few things; I will put you in charge of many things. Come and share your master’s happiness!’ Then the man who had received the one talent came. ‘Master,’ he said, ‘I knew that you are a hard man, harvesting where you have not sown and gathering where you have not scattered seed. So I was afraid and went out and hid your talent in the ground. See, here is what belongs to you.’ His master replied, ‘You wicked, lazy servant! So you knew that I harvest where I have not sown and gather where I have not scattered seed? Well then, you should have put my money on deposit with the bankers, so that when I returned I would have received it back with interest. Take the talent from him and give it to the one who has the ten talents. For everyone who has will be given more, and he will have an abundance. Whoever does not have, even what he has will be taken from him. And throw that worthless servant outside, into the darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’

Now, one of the most common ways that this parable of Yeshua is mistaught, and I believe it can lead us down a wrong path, is to look past the cultural context of this parable and interpret talents to mean the giftedness with which the L-RD has blessed each of us. So there are teachers who will go on and on about using your talents in the service of the L-RD, whether it be singing, dancing, writing, teaching, organizing, working with numbers, or whatever it may be that God has given you as a special talent.

Now, using your God-given talents in service to God is a good thing. I agree with it. We can and should all strive to live closer to that ideal. However … that’s not what this parable is about, and I believe Yeshua’s real point here has been missed by those who teach this parable in this way.

I believe the root of this misunderstand starts with simply misunderstanding what Yeshua means by “talent” here. So what is a talent? Well, it’s actually a unit of measurement, one that is used for measuring precious metals, primarily. The Greek word used is talanton, and we find this definition in:

STRONG’S G5007 talanton
• 2) that which is weighed, a talent 2a) a weight varying in different places and times 2b) a sum of money weighing a talent and varying in different states and according to the changes in the laws regulating currency 2b2) a talent of silver in Israel weighed about 100 pounds (45 kg) 2b3) a talent of gold in Israel weighed about 200 pounds (91 kg).

In addition to this, we are offered this insight by:

Stern, Jewish New Testament Commentary, p. 59
In Roman times one talent equaled 6,000 denarii, a denarius being roughly a day’s wages for a common laborer … Haman offered King Achashverosh of Persia 10,000 talents of silver to destroy the Jews (Esther 3:9).

So, a talent is a measurement of money used in the ancient world, and it’s a significant amount of money. In fact, if a talent is equal to 6,000 denarii, and a denarii is roughly one day’s wages for the common working person, then it would take the average person, taking only Shabbats off, around 19 years to earn a single talent. Add in the festivals of the L-RD and it’s probably closer to 21 years or more, just to earn a single talent of money.

Stern elaborates on this to give us an idea of just how much money we’re talking about; I’ve updated the amounts in the following quote to reflect today’s precious metal prices, as of this week:

Stern, Jewish New Testament Commentary, p. 59
If a day’s wages today is in the neighborhood of $80, 10,000 talents would be $4.8 billion! In the Tanakh a talent weighs 75.6 avoirdupois pounds. This amount of gold, at $1120/troy ounce, is worth nearly $13.54 billion; the same amount of silver, at $17.37/troy ounce, comes to over $210 million.

Now, applying this to the current parable, assuming it is speaking of talents of gold, the man with the five talents was entrusted with the equivalent of – in today’s prices – $6.8 million, the man with two talents with $2.7 million, and the man with one talent, $1.35 million.

So, what can we draw from this? Well, first and foremost, I think it should help us realize that even the man given a single talent by his master was given a vast fortune, not a limited resource. While his share may seem small in comparison to the other two, he in fact has been given much more than most people would ever have access to all at once in their lifetimes.

By now, I think it’s clear that this parable does concern itself with financial resources; this is supported by the text itself, when it mentions that the servants of the master are given “talents of money.”

So now that we know Yeshua is teaching us something about our financial resources, let’s take a step back and take note of the greater context of this parable. Without understanding the context of what Yeshua’s teaching here, it would be too easy to fall into misinterpreting what he means.

Remember the very first word of this parable? What is it? It begins, “Again.” The first few words, in fact, are, “Again, it will be like…” So the next questions we must answer are, why is the word “again” here, and to what is the word “it” referring?

Well, if we take a look at the first half of Matthew 25, we see that Yeshua is teaching another parable there, the parable of the ten virgins. The word “again,” therefore, means that whatever Yeshua is about to tell us is linked to what he’s already taught. This is done for emphasis, or to get a point across. Yeshua is telling us that he’s about to make the same point – again – and he’s hoping that if we didn’t get it the first time, we’ll grasp it the second time.

This teaching style is often used by parents teaching their younger children. It would be similar to telling a child, “Right now, it’s time for the dog to sleep,” and then saying, “Again, do not play with the dog right now.”

I’m making the same point each time, but saying it in different ways to emphasize the point. This teaching style can also be used to help eliminate the possibility of misunderstanding. So one thing we gain from the context immediately is the insight that, whatever point Yeshua is making with the parable of the talents, it must be congruent with the point he’s making in the parable of the ten virgins.

Now let’s read how the parable of the ten virgins begins. We read this in:

Matthew 25:1
“At that time the kingdom of heaven will be like ten virgins who took their lamps and went out to meet the bridegroom.”

Well, this answers what the “it” refers to in the parable of the talents. The “it” is “the kingdom of heaven.” Yet we have a new question arising from this verse as well. Yeshua starts the parable of the ten virgins with the phrase, “At that time.” Since he’s making the same point in both parables, we need to understand what he means by, “At that time,” in the parable of the ten virgins, in order to understand the parable of the talents properly, don’t we?

So, if we back up to chapter 24, what well see is that both of these parables are building off of an earlier discussion with his disciples, as we read in:

Matthew 24:3
As Yeshua was sitting on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to him privately. “Tell us,” they said, “when will this happen, and what will be the sign of your coming and of the end of the age?”

Since this point, Yeshua has been teaching the twelve about this period of time – the sign of his coming, the end of the age – without interruption. Each thing he teaches is designed to add another layer of understanding to what he’s already taught. And throughout these few chapters, to remind us that he’s still responding to his talmudim’s questions about the end of the age and His coming, he begins to use this phrase, “At that time,” as we read in:

Matthew 24:10
At that time many will turn away from the faith and will betray and hate each other,

And again in:

Matthew 24:23
At that time if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Messiah!’ or, ‘There he is!’ do not believe it.

And again in:

Matthew 24:30
“At that time the sign of the Son of Man will appear in the sky, and all the nations of the earth will mourn. They will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of the sky, with power and great glory.

And this pattern simply continues until Yeshua is done teaching on this topic, and we know that both parables are part of this teaching because it is not concluded until we read, in:

Matthew 26:1-2
When Yeshua had finished saying all these things, he said to his disciples, “As you know, the Passover is two days away–and the Son of Man will be handed over to be crucified.”

So now, with confidence, we can pinpoint the time Yeshua is teaching about with both of these parables, when he uses the phrase, “at that time.” The parable of the talents is a teaching about the return of Yeshua.

Now, Rabbi Stan has often taught on the parable of the ten virgins. And from his teaching, we know that the thing which separated the five wise virgins from the five foolish virgins was what? The oil in their lamps. And what does the oil symbolize? Well, it does not symbolize the presence of the Holy Spirit – the Ruach haKodesh – as some teachers suggest, does it? No, it represents our acts of giving, of charity, our good deeds, our mitzvahs, our kindness shown to others, the way in which we treat those who are in need. And we know this is Yeshua’s message because it is stated even more implicitly later in chapter 25, which we’ll look at in a moment.

But before we do, let’s apply this insight to our understanding of the parable of the talents. Yeshua has been teaching us of his return, of the Day of Judgment. So this is a teaching related to which fall festival of the L-RD? Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement! What do we know about the Day of Atonement? We read this in:

Leviticus 16:29-31
“This is to be a lasting ordinance for you: On the tenth day of the seventh month you must deny yourselves and not do any work–whether native-born or an alien living among you–because on this day atonement will be made for you, to cleanse you. Then, before the L-RD, you will be clean from all your sins. It is a sabbath of rest, and you must deny yourselves; it is a lasting ordinance.

And again, in:

Numbers 29:7-11
“‘On the tenth day of this seventh month hold a sacred assembly. You must deny yourselves and do no work. Present as an aroma pleasing to the L-RD a burnt offering of one young bull, one ram and seven male lambs a year old, all without defect. With the bull prepare a grain offering of three-tenths of an ephah of fine flour mixed with oil; with the ram, two-tenths; and with each of the seven lambs, one-tenth. Include one male goat as a sin offering, in addition to the sin offering for atonement and the regular burnt offering with its grain offering, and their drink offerings.

So the Day of Atonement is the day when our sins are paid for and the books between ourselves and the L-RD are brought into balance. This insight is reflected in the parable when Yeshua teaches, “After a long time the master of those servants returned and settled accounts with them.” This settling of accounts alludes to the Day of Judgment. It is the day Yeshua has been speaking of, the day referred to in the parable of the ten virgins and now the day he’s referring to here.

And this makes sense, doesn’t it? I mean, if the oil in the lamps in the ten virgins parable represented the Holy Spirit, how long could it take to be filled with the Holy Spirit? Not long, right? But if the time for the wedding supper has come and the oil represents our good deeds – what we did with what we were given by the L-RD – then how long would it take to make up for a lifetime of neglecting the needs of those around us? A pretty long time, right? And too long for them to be ready for the wedding supper once the bridegroom’s return is imminent.

So, if Yeshua’s point about our mitzvahs – our good deeds – being significant at the Day of Judgment is unclear in the parable of the ten virgins, it becomes clearer in the parable of the talents. Remember, all three servants have been entrusted with different resources according to their abilities, but each is still entrusted with plenty, right? I mean, sure, servant with five talents may have more – about $6.8 million, remember – but even one talent is $1.35 million in assets, and if someone can’t figure out how to bless others with those kinds of resources, well, they need a deeper prayer life.

But now we’re getting to the heart of what used to confuse me about this parable. At the master’s return, on the Day of Atonement, at the settling of books, the servant given five talents has doubled what he was given and so has the servant with two talents. Yet the servant with one talent was afraid and instead of putting that talent to work, he hid it and returns to his master exactly what was given him.

Now, the master’s reaction is what used to confuse me, because it doesn’t appear that the servant with one talent did anything wrong. I mean, he didn’t sneak off with his master’s money, or spend it on himself, did he? And yet he’s called wicked and lazy and is tossed outside of His master’s presence!

Yet what I have realized as I have studied this parable over and over again is this: my understanding of this parable had been influenced for many years by yet another off-target way of looking at this parable. Too often, people approach this parable like it is the secret to financial success in this life. They interpret it by fleshly definitions, when in fact Yeshua is offering a deep teaching of the Spirit. Does it make sense, then, to treat this parable like “God’s Secret to Earning Quick Cash Now!”?

Of course not. That’s not what Yeshua is teaching here. He’s not instructing us on how to invest in Wall Street; he’s instructing us on how to invest in the streets of gold in the kingdom of God! You see, the talents each servant is given represent our earthly treasures, all that the L-RD will bless us with over the course of our lives. This is a teaching about how we use the resources we already have to advance the kingdom of the L-RD. Will we be like the faithful servants, who “put their money to work” and doubled what they were originally given? Or will we fear our L-RD and hide all that we have so that it cannot grow beyond us?

Again, this is not about gaining riches in this life, but storing up for ourselves treasures that cannot perish in the World to Come. As we read in:

Matthew 6:19-21
“Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy, and where thieves break in and steal. But store up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where moth and rust do not destroy, and where thieves do not break in and steal. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.

So in light of this, what is Yeshua teaching here? Do we want to keep all that the L-RD has blessed us with in this life to ourselves, and go before Him on the Day of Atonement to offer it all back, but with nothing beyond what he’s given us to show for it? Or do we want to expand His kingdom? If our heart is focused on His kingdom, then we’ll invest our treasure beyond ourselves. We’ll put food in front of the hungry, clothes on the backs of the needy, offer shelter to those without homes. We’ll treat others with the same unearned kindness the L-RD has shown us, won’t we?

You see, the key to handling our treasures in this life is not to tithe, is not to give away no more than twenty percent lest we become destitute ourselves as the rabbis teach, but to realize that all we have belongs to God; it’s not even ours to begin with, but the L-RD’s and we’re to do His work with it.

We find out just exactly what Yeshua is driving at as we read beyond the parable of the talents, in:

Matthew 25:41-46
“Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’ They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’ He will reply, ‘I tell you the truth, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’ Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.”

Could it be any clearer? By the end of chapter 25, Yeshua is being about as unveiled as possible. Our faithfulness to our master, Yeshua, is measured by our deeds!

So is Yeshua teaching that it is our deeds that are our salvation? No! Yeshua alone saves us. He is offering us a deeper teaching, a teaching about how to pursue righteousness, holy living. He is speaking to his disciples, his talmudim, to those of us who have already been saved and he’s asking us, “OK, now what are you going to do with it?”

Now, some might object and claim this is putting us back under the idea of works. But this is not so; even James, the very brother of our Messiah Yeshua, agrees on this point, as we read in:

James 1: 22, 27
Do not merely listen to the word, and so deceive yourselves. Do what it says … Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world.

And also:

James 2:14-18
What good is it, my brothers, if a man claims to have faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save him? Suppose a brother or sister is without clothes and daily food. If one of you says to him, “Go, I wish you well; keep warm and well fed,” but does nothing about his physical needs, what good is it? In the same way, faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead. But someone will say, “You have faith; I have deeds.” Show me your faith without deeds, and I will show you my faith by what I do.

So one question remains, one passage that for a long time has eluded me. In the master’s rebuke of the lazy servant, he says, “So you knew that I harvest where I have not sown and gather where I have not scattered seed? Well then, you should have put my money on deposit with the bankers, so that when I returned I would have received it back with interest.”

The meaning of this passage eluded me until preparing this sermon. Then the pieces started to fall into place.
If the talents of money are about using our earthly resources to store up treasure in the World to Come, then what’s this about putting it on deposit with bankers and having the master get it back with interest?

Now, clearly, the wicked servant is operating out of fear. Perhaps he was afraid he’d lose his master’s fortune. But how can you lose a fortune if your job is to give it away to those in need? You can’t. But another fear paradigm is this: perhaps the servant feared he’d invest it poorly; like the person who means to help a homeless person by giving them money, only to find out those funds bought the last bottle of whiskey that left them dying in an abandoned alley.

So, using the fear explanation, could one understand the concerns of a person who is afraid of using what they’ve been given in ways that don’t advance the kingdom? Possibly, but is that an excuse not to give, not to help? No. That’s why I think the comment about the bankers is here. Could it be that Yeshua is telling us, “If you’re afraid to invest your earthly treasures yourself, then entrust them to those with experience.”

Again, this is not about banking in this life! This is about spreading the kingdom of the L-RD. If you don’t know how best to invest in spreading the kingdom of the L-RD yourself, then give to those who do; there are many ministries that help the needy. It can be as close to home as your local community of believers, or as global as giving to ministries that help poor Jewish people return to the land of Israel, or anything in between. And I’d suggest this; if you pray long enough and hard enough, the L-RD will not return vacant anything you give in faith. Your treasures in heaven will accumulate.

The bottom line on the parable of the talents is this; we all have more than we think we’ve been given, and we should use it prayerfully and wisely, putting it to work to advance the kingdom of heaven, rather than invest in our comfort and convenience in this world. While none of us are complete works in this regard, all of us – I’m including myself – can do better in trusting the L-RD enough to turn our treasures, our finances, over to Him. For it is far better to enter into the World to Come hearing Yeshua say, “Well done, good and faithful servant! You have been faithful with a few things; I will put you in charge of many things. Come and share your master’s happiness!” than it is to hear, “Throw that worthless servant outside, into the darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.”

May we all live toward, and earn, that “Well done” praise from Messiah Yeshua, our master, on the Day of Judgment and in the World to Come.

Shabbat Shalom.

My Let’s Be Fruitful Sermon

Thursday, August 20th, 2009

I had a chance to fill in for Rabbi Stan again at Beth Yeshua on August 15, making the message below my third-ever full-length sermon. I decided to build on the ideas I had explored in my Ekev commentary, only with a lot more freedom to go into the Brit HaDesha writings because it’s a sermon, not a Torah commentary. Anyway, here’s my third-ever sermon entitled, “Let’s Be Fruitful!” Or listen to it!

Shabbat Shalom.

Last week, we studied the parashah of Ekev and we found that the L-RD wants to bless us, but he can only do so when we obey him. We talked about how this teaching is reflected in the New Covenant writings, in the words of Yeshua himself. He compares Himself to a vine, the Father to a gardener, and us to branches and points out that any branch that does not bear fruit will be cut off, and that even those branches that do bear fruit will be pruned so they can become even more fruitful.

It was a sobering message that proves that the same God is present in both the Tenakh and the New Covenant writings, that this cliché about the God of Moses being only about law and judgment, while the God of Yeshua is a God only of love and grace, is nonsense for anyone who actually studies the entire Bible closely.

So we ended with the thought, “So let’s be fruitful!” And that’s a fine enough sentiment, but it’s not very concrete, is it? What does this state of being fruitful look like? What is it?

That will be the focus of our study today.

Now, in my study, I’ve found that there are at least three ways in which this concept of fruitfulness is expressed in the Bible: through parenting, through the gifts of the Spirit and through living out one’s faith in actions that draw others to the L-RD. Yet before we go there, let’s take a look at the word fruitful itself. According to Strong’s Bible Dictionary, the Hebrew word most often translated “fruitful” is:

H6509 parah
• AV – fruitful 19, increased 3, grow 2, beareth 1, forth 1, bring fruit 1, make fruitful 1; 29

Now, parah can also mean increased, but most often, it is translated as fruitful. Yet the definition we find here almost defines the word by its root, which isn’t always helpful, so let’s take at the root word, fruit, which is:

H6529 pariy
• AV – fruit 113, fruitful 2, boughs 1, firstfruits + 07225 1, reward 1, fruit thereof 1; 119
• 1) fruit 1a) fruit, produce (of the ground) 1b) fruit, offspring, children, progeny (of the womb) 1c) fruit (of actions) (fig.)

Now the picture is becoming clearer. As we begin to look at our first definition of being fruitful, we stumble across it right here in the definition for pariy: one way to be fruitful is to bear and raise children. This is a point of agreement, in some ways, with rabbinic tradition, as we read in:

Seder Nezikin (Damage); Avoth (Fathers); Mishnah 1
Moses received the Torah at Sinai and transmitted it to Joshua, Joshua to the elders, and the elders to the prophets, and the prophets to the men of the great synagogue. The latter used to say three things: be patient in [the administration of] justice, rear many disciples and make a fence round the Torah.

Now, I took this from the Soncino Edition of the Babylonian Talmud and notice this slightly different translation. While the traditional reading is to “make” many disciples, this edition translates “make” as “rear,” as in child-rearing. Certainly Jewish practice over the centuries has been that raising children in the ways of Torah is a part of being fruitful.

While many college kids tend to define ministry and missions as something that happens in a far-off country or remote island, like Argentina or Cuba or Kenya, what most experienced parents will tell you is that your mission field starts, most importantly, with your own children. In fact, it is one of the first commands the L-RD gives to mankind.

Genesis 1:27-28
So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and over every living creature that moves on the ground.”

It is a command that is later reaffirmed by God to Noah and his sons after the great flood. This sense of fruitfulness, of increasing in numbers, is seen as a primary source of blessing throughout the Torah. It is key to the promise God makes to Abraham, in which He promises to make the patriarch so fruitful that his descendants will outnumber the stars in the heavens. And the opposite is true as well; in ancient times those who were unable to bear children, to be fruitful and multiply their numbers, were thought to be under a curse, or at least under judgment, by the L-RD.

Now, Judaism considers having children a religious requirement, especially for their rabbis. Why? Because that is the best way to ensure that there will be another generation of Jews who will learn, study and dedicate themselves to the Torah of God. Despite being a requirement, Judaism also considers children a blessing and, “the greatest gift that God can bestow upon us.”

But that aspect of being fruitful is rather self-explanatory. Now, let’s move on to the fruits of the spirit. The Greek word for fruit is karpos, according to the Strong’s, and among its definitions are these:

G2590 karpos
• 1a) the fruit of the trees, vines, of the fields 1b) the fruit of one’s loins, i.e. his progeny, his posterity 2) that which originates or comes from something, an effect, result 2a) work, act, deed 2b) advantage, profit, utility 2c) praises, which are presented to God as a thank offering

In light of what we’re about to discuss, I especially like definition 2c. You see, anyone can make a claim that they believe in God; they can tell you they are filled with the Spirit. But since belief depends on the position of one’s heart toward God, and since the Spirit of the L-RD is not a measurable substance, how does one know when such a claim is true?

Well, we are given a clue in:

Galatians 5:22-23
But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control. Against such things there is no law.

So, there it is in black and white. It’s a familiar passage to most believers and it sounds so perfect, so ideal, that often the list is taken for granted. Yet how many of you know believers – maybe even the one staring back at you in the mirror each morning – who struggle with most of these? I know I do. Are we always as patient as we ought to be with others, for example? Are we gentle with each other, or harsh? Are we always in control of ourselves, or are we prone to outbursts?

But you see, this is only the end of an important passage of Scripture, and often the preceding verses are completely overlooked. So let’s back up now and take a look at:

Galatians 5:17-21
For the sinful nature desires what is contrary to the Spirit, and the Spirit what is contrary to the sinful nature. They are in conflict with each other, so that you do not do what you want. But if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under law. The acts of the sinful nature are obvious: sexual immorality, impurity and debauchery; idolatry and witchcraft; hatred, discord, jealousy, fits of rage, selfish ambition, dissensions, factions and envy; drunkenness, orgies, and the like. I warn you, as I did before, that those who live like this will not inherit the kingdom of God.

Remember the insight Stan has given us into this passage in his recent teachings. What does Paul mean when he says, “If you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the law?” Does it mean the laws of the L-RD are done away with? Certainly not! It means that we are called to live to a standard far above the minimum standard described in the Torah. And if you are living above that minimum standard, you can’t be under it, right? But it is this list of bad fruit that I’d like to draw our attention to today.

You see, we are about to start the month of Elul in a few days and traditionally the month of Elul is to be a time of self-reflection in preparation for the fall festivals. It is a time when we examine ourselves – our lives, our behavior, our choices and our attitudes – as we prepare for the Day of Atonement. The process intensifies after Rosh haShanah and the Days of Awe that follow, leading up to Yom Kippur, but the month of Elul is the beginning of that time of reflection, assessment and repentance.

So, what better time could there be to look at these fruits of the Spirit – the good fruits that manifest themselves when we live by the Spirit, as well as the bad fruits – the sinfulness – that manifests itself when we are not living by the Spirit – and prepare to be honest with ourselves and with the L-RD about where we’ve fallen short and are in need of His healing and His atoning sacrifice?

The truth is, we all fall short somewhere. My list may be different from the next person’s, because our areas of weakness and vulnerability are not identical; but we all need atonement. Yet it’s important to distinguish between falling short on occasion, in moments of weakness, and what Paul talks about here. He says, “I warn you, as I did before, that those who live like this will not inherit the kingdom of heaven.”

Take note of that. There is falling short on occasion, and what Paul calls, “Living like this.” In other words, living in a state of willing sinful behavior.

You see, this is where we differ from those who teach about grace and grace alone. We believe that what is done in the flesh still matters to God, even though our forgiveness comes from Messiah and not our own merit. What is done in the flesh is what can trip us up in our lives, our relationships, our witness and our ministry, if we slip into the kind of arrogance that says, “It doesn’t matter what we do, because we’re forgiven anyway.”

Here we read just the opposite, that those who live like this will not inherit the kingdom of God! See, we know that even Messiah Yeshua warned us that although the L-RD wants to bless us richly, He can and will do so only if we bear fruit, and if losing out on the kingdom is the alternative, well, I know I for one want to start bearing fruit!

As we read last week:

John 15:1-2
“I am the true vine, and my Father is the gardener. He cuts off every branch in me that bears no fruit, while every branch that does bear fruit he prunes so that it will be even more fruitful.

So, let us ask ourselves, are we bearing fruit? And if we are, what kind of fruit are we bearing? Are we demonstrating the good fruit of the Spirit of the L-RD, the fruit which allows us to reflect the character of God to others? Or are we bearing the bad fruit of our old and sinful nature, the selfishness that leads to hypocrisy, disputes, anger, jealousy and every bad thing?

You see – and this is, I believe, important to realize – no matter whether we are led by the Spirit of the L-RD or our own selfish desires, we will end up being a reflection of someone. If we are led of the Spirit, we can rest peacefully in the knowledge that we are reflecting the character of the L-RD. But if we lead ourselves, if we allow selfishness to rule us, we will still reflect on the character of the L-RD, yet we will not be reflecting His character, but our own, and thus bring a bad report not only to our own name, but to His. This is why it is written, in:

Romans 2:23-24
You who brag about the law, do you dishonor God by breaking the law? As it is written: “God’s name is blasphemed among the Gentiles because of you.”

You see, whether we realize it or not, whether we accept it or not, as believers what we do reflects on God in the eyes of those around us. Those who say “the law has been done away with,” and intend by saying that to suggest that the Torah no longer applies – what is their source of a standard for holy living, or – to use a word familiar to Christianity – what is their standard for justification?

For those who cast aside the Torah, ultimately it becomes a completely subjective standard. But is that what God desires? Is a subjective standard part of His teachings or instructions? Or has the L-RD already given us a blueprint for what He finds holy, what He finds acceptable?

That is the point. We must allow the L-RD to tell us what His standards are; we cannot just make it up as we go along. After all, as the L-RD tells us in this week’s parashah, which Phil just did a fine job of commenting on:

Deuteronomy 12:4, 8-9
You must not worship the L-RD your God in their way … You are not to do as we do here today, everyone as he sees fit, since you have not yet reached the resting place and the inheritance the
L-RD your God is giving you.

This is a direct response by the L-RD to the idea that it’s OK to worship the God in our own way, rather than His way, or to make up our own standards, rather than accepting His. He is opposed to that, and there is a limit to His patience with it.

So again, how can we tell the difference between the appearance and the reality, between someone who serves the L-RD and is led by His spirit, and someone who only claims to do so, but is more committed to following his or her own desires? We are given another clue how in:

Hebrews 13:15-16
Through Yeshua, therefore, let us continually offer to God a sacrifice of praise–the fruit of lips that confess his name. And do not forget to do good and to share with others, for with such sacrifices God is pleased.

So there’s a clue right there! Praising the L-RD is a fruit of Spirit, and let me tell you, it’s not an easy one to fake for very long. I have a friend who was in a band, and his band was a band committed to honoring the L-RD through music. He told me the story of one of his bandmates who, although he claimed to be a believer, whenever they would perform, he’d start having attitude problems. These problems magnified to the point where he actually began cussing and taking the name of the L-RD in vain on stage.

Of course, he had to be let go from the band, but when my friend asked this guy what was up with all this weird behavior, his reply was, and I’m quoting him loosely here, “Well, I want to believe in God, but I really wanted to play in a band to attract women. So whenever I would try to join in praising the L-RD, I couldn’t. It’s like someone was preventing me from praising the L-RD and instead all these curses came out.”

Of course, such a tale is no surprise to those of us who understand what Yeshua meant when he said, in:

Matthew 7:16-18
By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? Likewise every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit.

So displaying the fruits of the Spirit in our attitudes, our behavior and our choices is another way to be fruitful in the eyes of the L-RD. The final way to be fruitful that I’d like to examine today is the one, however, that goes the deepest, and that’s being fruitful by our actions, by our ministry, by our example in ways that draw others closer to God.

You know, people hear the word ministry and they tend to freeze up, or they blow it off and say, “Well, I’m not a minister, so I don’t have to worry about that. I’m in sales” or “I’m an English teacher” or “I work in law enforcement.” But the truth is, no matter what we do to earn a paycheck six days out of the week, all of us who are believers are ministers in that we represent God to whomever we come into contact with.

This is why we want the holiness of the Sabbath rest not to be limited to the twenty-four hour period of the Sabbath, but to spill over into the mundane part of our week as well, so that we will remember the L-RD, honor Him and obey all of his instructions throughout the rest of our week, and so that we don’t misrepresent Him and bring dishonor to His name.

You know, many believers develop a misunderstanding of their relationship with the L-RD. Like the Israelites of last week’s Torah portion, they believe that they have come to rest in Messiah Yeshua by their own merits. Yet even Yeshua insists this is not the case, as we read in:

John 15:14-16
You are my friends if you do what I command. I no longer call you servants, because a servant does not know his master’s business. Instead, I have called you friends, for everything that I learned from my Father I have made known to you. You did not choose me, but I chose you and appointed you to go and bear fruit–fruit that will last. Then the Father will give you whatever you ask in my name.

Did you catch that? Yeshua does indeed call us His friends … if we do as He commands. What are His commands? They are the Torah, which He gave to Moses on Sinai. Furthermore, he stresses this: We did not choose Him. He chose us! This is the same message as the L-RD gave Moses to pass on to the Israelites before they were about to enter the land. We do not choose God; God chooses us. Not our merit; His merit. Not our righteousness; His righteousness. The same God, the same message, the same salvation, the same Messiah.

You see, obedience to the Messiah Yeshua and obedience to the Torah is the same thing. You cannot do away with one, without doing away with the other also. The Torah was spoken to Moses by the Messiah Yeshua, who as John reveals in his gospel is the very Word of God. Messiah Yeshua is the living Torah. They cannot be separated, and yet what do so many songs of praise say? “I choose you, L-RD.” Or “I lift You up, L-RD.” Doesn’t that fly right in the face of what the L-RD just told us?

Why does obedience come so hard to so many of us? Even Yeshua recognized this, when He said in:

Luke 6:46-49
“Why do you call me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ and do not do what I say? I will show you what he is like who comes to me and hears my words and puts them into practice. He is like a man building a house, who dug down deep and laid the foundation on rock. When a flood came, the torrent struck that house but could not shake it, because it was well built. But the one who hears my words and does not put them into practice is like a man who built a house on the ground without a foundation. The moment the torrent struck that house, it collapsed and its destruction was complete.”

This is what the L-RD means by fruitfulness. Do we just read the Bible like a good novel, to find out what happens? Or do we allow its instructions into our lives, to change how we interact with the world around us? Do we listen to Stan’s sermons each week because we like his speaking style or his method of teaching? Or do we actually allow the insights God has given him to shake us out of our passivity and make real changes to how we are living out our faith in Yeshua?

Let’s put this into concrete terms for a moment. Let’s imagine a scenario where we received a visitor here at Beth Yeshua. He comes in, he enjoys the music, the people he meets seem friendly, and the food down at the Oneg is pretty tasty. In fact, I can hear some stomachs growling out there right now. But anyway, when he goes back into the parking lot, let’s say he discovers a tire on his car has gone flat. It’s not safe to drive anymore and the nearest tire outlet is a bit beyond safe walking distance, especially with that busy highway to cross.

So, out comes one family and let’s say they planned to go do a great mitzvah, the Feed My Starving Children event. This stranger asks for their help, but this family doesn’t want to miss out on Feed My Starving Children, so they promise to pray for him and off they go.

Another family comes out and they have committed themselves to a weekly Family Night in their home. So, same story, they wish the stranger well, and off they go without lifting a finger to help.

Both of these families are doing good things; their other plans are not at issue. But are they doing the right thing by this stranger? Are they bearing what Yeshua calls “fruit that will last?” Are they bearing the fruit of the Spirit? Are they being fruitful in deed as well as word?

Let’s get to the point: if that’s all this person experienced during his visit here, and he ended up alone in the parking lot with a flat tire, having to call a secular friend to come and help him while we all go our separate ways doing our spiritual things and our mitzvahs and our other good works we already had planned – none of them bad in and of themselves, mind you – do you think that visitor will ever come back here? And then you have to ask yourself … is that what being fruitful is?

But hold on. Along comes one more family. Let’s say they have a family reunion they want to get to. But they see this visitor has a flat tire and they put their plans on hold immediately. They offer him a ride to the nearest tire shop, wait with him while he buys a tire, and return to the parking lot to help him install it and get on his way.

The picture changes, doesn’t it? Now do you think this first-time visitor is going to come back? Probably. And it won’t be because of the good food or the intriguing teaching or the nice facility. It will be because he can say, “Here’s a place where the people who attend really live out their faith. Here’s a place where people think about more than themselves, their own needs and goals and plans. Here’s a place where faith goes more than skin-deep.”

That’s what being fruitful means. Here’s what we read to confirm this in:

Colossians 1:10
And we pray this in order that you may live a life worthy of the Lord and may please him in every way: bearing fruit in every good work, growing in the knowledge of God,

So, before we bring this to a close, I’d like to address some possible responses to the illustration I just outlined. Now, some folks will hear this story of a man with a flat tire and object, saying, “You can’t take him to a tire shop on the Sabbath! That’s violating the Sabbath by exchanging goods for services on Shabbat!” And yet even the rabbis teach that “the preservation of life comes before all the rules of the Torah.”

Hold on a second, some may say; this guy has a flat tire, sure, but his life isn’t at stake. So you’d still be violating the Sabbath. Yet consider this: perhaps it is the middle of winter and it is twenty below zero outside. Or perhaps it’s summer and there’s a violent storm on the way, or overbearing heat is an issue. Even if conditions are nice, what is happening to this stranger’s life while he’s stranded with a flat tire and no one offering to help him? Well, his life isn’t moving forward, is it? It’s on hold. Perhaps he has something just as important to get to, as important as anything other families are going off to do.

Whatever the justification might be, however, we come back to the basics of the scenario: without help, this man is stranded in our parking lot and needs to call a secular friend to get on with his life and he comes away not feeling great about Beth Yeshua. With help from someone here, his needs are provided for and he comes away feeling very good about Beth Yeshua. Which type of congregation would you rather belong to? Which do you think is bearing good fruit?

As you ponder that, I’ll leave you with these words from:

John 3:7-11
John said to the crowds coming out to be baptized by him, “You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the coming wrath? Produce fruit in keeping with repentance. And do not begin to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father.’ For I tell you that out of these stones God can raise up children for Abraham. The ax is already at the root of the trees, and every tree that does not produce good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire.” “What should we do then?” the crowd asked. John answered, “The man with two tunics should share with him who has none, and the one who has food should do the same.”

Shabbat Shalom.

The difference between commentaries and sermons

Thursday, March 5th, 2009

I think I’m finally grasping the difference between sermons and commentaries. It’s been a fine line for me and one I haven’t always seen clearly as I continue my Messianic training. It’s a quandary even the best diet pills can’t help me with.

So, here’s my understanding as of now: in a Torah commentary, the purpose is to teach, not to exhort. In a sermon, exhortation is just fine. Check.

Now here’s my newest insight: in a Torah commentary, you are to stick closely to the content of the parashah, not use it as a launching point for tangentially-related topics. Check.

OK, so, a good commentary on Tetsaveh, for example, would talk about the priestly garments described in the instructions of the L-RD to Moses. A less-focused commentary that strays into sermonizing would be one that picks up on the presence of a hint of Messiah in the instructions for the Tent of Meeting, and then launching into the theme of obedience to God.

Guess which way my upcoming Tetsaveh commentary went? Not the better of the two ways, I’m afraid, but in the process I did learn a lot more about how to distinguish a commentary from a sermon; so it was a great growing experience! Mazel tov!

Distractions to completing a sermon

Sunday, October 19th, 2008

Like anyone else, I can be lured by distractions from tasks I need to complete, like writing my Friday sermon. Let’s face it, there are times when I’d much rather be plopped in front of my PlayStation 3 than studying ancient texts. We all have similar temptations, though they are different for each of us.

The trick to overcoming distractions, I’ve found, is to rediscover what’s exciting about the task at hand in the first place. For example, I enjoy studying Scripture. I enjoy reading and researching ancient insights into Scripture. It’s fun to find nuggets of insight, polish them up, and present them in a way that opens up new ways of understanding those passages for other people.

I enjoy delivering a message. Sure, it’s a bit nerve-wracking at times, but once I start speaking, I enjoy the task of sharing the message I’m delivering with others. Perhaps it’s my background in theater, but being in front of a crowd isn’t that big of a hurdle for me.

Once I think about things like these, the call of that PS3 game diminishes into the background and I’m able to enjoy the heck out of the very activity that, at times, seems like a task rather than a joy.

My 30-minute challenge

Sunday, October 19th, 2008

This week, I’m facing my newest challenge: composing my first-ever 30-minute sermon, to be delivered on Erev Shabbat Service this coming Friday. To keep things simple for me, Rabbi Stan has told me to simply expand on my Torah commentary for this coming Sabbath.

I’m blessed that it’s coming this particular week, as I’ll have a chance to cover one of the meatiest parashahs in the entire Torah cycle: B’resheet. This will give me a chance to talk about creation, the fall of man, and the first murder – the story of Cain and Abel.

What I would like to do, I think, is concentrate all 30 minutes on Friday on creation and the fall of man, and make the Torah commentary all about Cain and Abel. I’m not intimidated by the challenge of filling up all this time, but about keeping it all within the time limit, since these five-plus chapters of B’resheet are so full of meaning and significance, I could easily envision – someday – doing several weeks on just these passages alone.

I have plenty of textbooks and source material to draw from, ranging from intelligent design writings to the musings of the sages. I’m really looking forward to this one!

My first time “up in front”

Tuesday, June 10th, 2008

It came with little warning, little preparation time, and a whole lot sooner than I’d planned; but last Friday, I finally had a chance to go up in front of the congregation and give a short talk. I wouldn’t quite call it a full-blown sermon; I was given 5-10 minutes and ending up running over 13 minutes, but I did reference over half a dozen Torah and Brit haDasha sources, so it felt a bit like a sermon. Or at least close enough for horse shoes and hand grenades. Take a listen and decide for yourself.

Anyway, the initiation was thrilling and fortunately everone was very supportive and offering positive feedback. I have a lot of seeking God left to do, but at least now I have some confidence about my ability to produce and deliver something approaching a sermon.

Sure, it’s not the kind of achievement that merits renting Vegas hotels for a getaway after, but it is a big milestone nevertheless.

Slow and imperfect human memory

Monday, March 12th, 2007

If only the human mind were as reliable as computer memory. It would be so easy to study Torah and related materials, then. Easy to recall all the details. For the human mind, however, it’s not a simple matter of uploading and downloading information.

Over several weeks, one reads a couple hundred pages of a textbook, sometimes over and over again. The mind engages, soaks in facts, then starts the process of comparing that information to all their prior life experiences, trying to make connections, spot contradictions, and filter it all into an end product called truth. Or at least an opinion on the truth of the matter.

Of course, it’s good practice. If I do go all the way down this path to ordination, I will eventually be expected to do this sort of thing every week and distill it into a couple end products: a Torah commentary and a sermon. As much work as it is, it’s exciting.